Quantcast
Channel: BIBLICAL ANTHROPOLOGY
Viewing all 362 articles
Browse latest View live

Ashkenazi represent Judeo-Khazar admixture

$
0
0

Ashkenazi Jews are a greater mix of genetic ancestries than previously thought.  They show evidence of gene flow from Slav, Scythian, Hunnic-Bulgar, Iranian, Alan and Turkic peoples. These formed the Khazar empire which at its height stretched from Kiev to the Aral Sea.
The Khazar empire fell in the 13th century AD, having been weakened by the Plague and Mongol invasions. Many Jewish refugees fled into Eastern Europe. Today these are known as Ashkenazi Jews. The future generations of many of these Jews was one of suffering under the Nazi regime. Their story is told in Elie Wiesel's Nobel Prize winning book Night.

The Khazar Hypothesis has been dismissed by some geneticists whose studies often seemed to be geared to proving the myth of Jewish racial purity or unadulterated ancestry from ancient Judea.


Khazaria map


A study published online in the journal Genome Biology and Evolution by Dr. Eran Elhaik, a geneticist at the Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, supports the Khazar Hypothesis. The origin of the Ashkenazi has continued to be disputed. The favored view is called the "Rhineland Hypothesis." According to this theory, descendants of the Canaanite Jews left Palestine for Europe following the Muslim conquest of Palestine in the 7th century AD. In the beginning of the 15th century, approximately 50,000 left Germany for eastern Europe. By the 20th century their numbers were estimated at about 8 million.

Under the Rhineland Hypothesis, European Jews would be very similar to each other and would have a predominant Middle Eastern ancestry. However, this is not the case, as Dr. Elhaik has shown through his research. Dr. Elhaik's paper, 'The missing link of Jewish European ancestry: contrasting the Rhineland and the Khazarian Hypotheses', examined a comprehensive dataset of 1,287 unrelated individuals of 8 Jewish and 74 non-Jewish populations genotyped over 531,315 autosomal single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). This was data published by Doron Behar and colleagues in 2010, which Elhaik used to calculate seven measures of ancestry, relatedness, admixture, allele sharing distances, geographical origins, and migration patterns. These identified the Caucasus-Near Eastern and European ancestral signatures in the European Jews' genome along with a smaller, but substantial Middle Eastern genome. The results were consistent in depicting a Caucasus ancestry for all European Jews. The analysis showed a tight genetic relationship between European Jews and Caucasus populations and pinpointed the biogeographic origin of the European Jews to the south of Khazaria, 560 kilometers from Samandar, Khazaria's capital.

Further analyses yielded a complex multi-ethnical ancestry with a slightly dominant Caucasus-Near Eastern, large South European and Middle Eastern ancestries, and a minor Eastern European contribution.

Dr. Elhaik writes, "The most parsimonious explanation for our findings is that Eastern European Jews are of Judeo-Khazarian ancestry forged over many centuries in the Caucasus. Jewish presence in the Caucasus and later Khazaria was recorded as early as the late centuries BCE and reinforced due to the increase in trade along the Silk Road, the decline of Judah (1st-7th centuries), and the rise of Christianity and Islam. Greco-Roman and Mesopotamian Jews gravitating toward Khazaria were also common in the early centuries and their migrations were intensified following the Khazars' conversion to Judaism… The religious conversion of the Khazars encompassed most of the Empire's citizens and subordinate tribes and lasted for the next 400 years until the invasion of the Mongols. At the final collapse of their empire in the 13th century, many of the Judeo-Khazars fled to Eastern Europe and later migrated to Central Europe and admixed with the neighbouring populations."

Read more here.


A Nilotic Strain?
Alice C. Linsley


It seems to me that the genetic strains of the Ashkenazi can be traced to well before the 7th century. They have roots much older than either of these hypotheses grants. The descendants of Japheth spread into Europe, Turkey, Pakistan, Mongolia from the Upper Nile. This explains the linguistic similarity between some Afro-Asiatic names and some Turkish, Pashtun and Mongolian names, including Jochi, Beri, Malik and Khan. Khan was originally a title meaning king. Today it is a common surname in Turkey, Afghanistan, Pakistan, India and Mongolia. It is equivalent to the Afro-Asiatic Kain or Kayan. Some of the Pashtun tribes adopted Malik as the ruler's title instead of Khan. Malik is equivalent to the Afro-Asiatic Melek, meaning king or ruler.

Genghis Khan married a woman of the Olkut’Hun, or Ogur Hun meaning the Hun clan/community. The word ogur means clan/community and appears to be equivalent to the Pashto orkut, meaning community. So ogur, orkut and olkut are cognates and likely related to the Kandahar dialect, which has Tir-hari as a principal dialect. Tir is a form of the name Tiras, mentioned in Genesis 10 and hari is a form of the word for Horite, which relates to Horus. So Genghis Khan married into a community which had connections to Abraham's Horite people, probably through the ruler Nimrod.

In the Hungarian origin stories, Nimrod had two sons: Magor and Hunor. Magor is the equivalent of the Afro-Asiatic name Magog and the Hungarian word Magyar. Magyar is the name for the Hungarian people. Some Magyar still live in the Upper Nile area where they are called the Magyar-ab, the Magyar tribe.

The ancestors of the Ashkenazi were likely merchants who settled in the shrine cities that were located on major water systems. In the ancient world merchants were called GR. There appears to be a relationship between the words gir, gar and ghar or khar. Bulghar was spoken by the Asiatic Ghars (Khars) from which the territory of Bulgaria takes its name. The Bulghar language was spoken in the Onogur tribal confederation into which Genghis Kahn married. Ono pertains to On or ancient Heliopolis, the Horite shrine city to which the great pyramids of Giza, Saqqara and Abusir are aligned.

The word ghar means house, as in royal palace or royal city and is a cognate to word khar. In ancient Egyptian, khar refers to a measure of fuel used to offer sacrifice in the temple. The temple (wat) was in the precinct of the royal palace. Among the Guruntum-Gar, a West Chadic people, khar appears as har in last names. An example is Andrew Haruna. Haruna is the Chadic name for Aaron, suggesting a very ancient connection between the priesthood of Israel and their Kushite ruler-priest ancestors.

The Horites have been identified with references to Khar, a unit of measurement used in trade in the Egyptian inscriptions. The word khar is related to gur. In Akkadian gurguri means metalworkers or copper smiths. In Oromo gurguru means to sell (gurgurtaa = sale, gurguraa = seller). In Somali gur- means to collect something and gurgure means "one who collects." The Gurgure clan of the Dir refers to traders who collect wares and resale them. Among the Dir guri means stick, rod or firearm.

The Persian and Urdu word Saudagar means trader. This contains the gr root in connection with Arabia. Horite traders dispersed across the ancient world. The association of the roots Ghar/GR (traders) and Khar/HR (Horites) is evident in India in place names such as Gurgaon Haryana.

The Gir-gam tells the story of Abraham's Proto-Saharan ancestors Cain, Seth and Noah. All were trader-rulers who controlled the water ways of West Central Africa.
Likely gr is also the root of the Japanese (Ainu) word guruma, meaning wheel. The Ainu originated in the Nile.
The word Horite takes many forms besides Khar and Gur. These include Hur, Horonaim, Horoni and Hori. Hori was the son of Lotan son of Seir, the Horite (Gen. 36). A linguistic connection to the Horites is retained in the name Horowitz (also spelled Hurwitz or Gurvich), a surname found among the Ashkenazi.


Related reading:  Noah's Sons and their Descendants; The Kushan-Kushite Connection; Were Abraham's People Refugees or Rulers?; Sub-Saharan DNA of Modern Jews




Ethiopian Icons

$
0
0

A not-so-clear scan of two old Ethiopian icons hanging over my desk.
On the right is Mary and the Christ Child.
Her halo is covered by a blue veil and there is an angel to her right and left.
On the left is St. George's stallion upon which he slays the dragon.


Here are clearer images of similar Ethiopian icons. Note the vibrant colors.







Related reading:  Ethiopian Icons; Ethiopian Icons Through the Centuries


Evidence of Castes in the Book of Ruth

$
0
0

Now in earlier times in Israel, for the redemption and transfer of property to become final, one party took off his sandal and gave it to the other. This was the method of legalizing transactions in Israel. (Ruth 4:7)


Alice C. Linsley

In Ruth we find Boaz acting as the levir. In levirate marriage a woman is taken as a wife by her deceased husband's brother in order to produce an heir for her dead husband. Levirate marriage is practiced by societies with a strong clan and caste structures in which exogamous marriage is forbidden.

The shoe given was leather (tahash) and therefore signals a life taken or lost. We recall that Naomi's husband and sons ha died. The exchange of the leather sandal is not specifically about levirate marriage, but rather about exchanging property after a death. Aben Ezra says that the giving of the leather shoe was "to confirm all things" whether by sale or barter.

The exchange of a leather shoe represents a solemn oath like that signaled by the exchange of a linen cloth, called "sudar." According to the Medieval rabbi Rashi, a linen cloth was used to make purchases and the cloth was called "sudar." Rashi is speaking of a different custom, but it too has ancient precedent given that "sudar" pertains to "Sudra" which refers to the Dravidians. Linen originated in the Nile Valley and was carried from there to India. Among Abraham's Nilo-Saharan ancestors wounds were treated with raw meat and bandaged with linen. Also dead domesticated animals were wrapped in white linen and buried near the towns.

The Dravidian leather workers are called "Madigas" and they are recognized as one of the oldest castes. The Madiga have nucleotide diversity levels as high as those of HapMap African populations. Among Abraham's people these were the "Ta-hash." One of Abraham's nephews was Tahash (Gen. 22:24).

This evidence for the African origin of castes such as the Horites and the Madigas has interesting implications for the Davidic monarchy. David was a direct descendant of Boaz who redeemed Ruth and her deceased husband's property in Bethlehem.

Bethlehem was a Horite settlement. 1 Chronicles 2:55 which says that Caleb's sons were Kenites. They were of Kenaz, a son of Eliphaz by Timna, daughter of Seir the Horite. Caleb's son Salma is designated the "founder" of Bethlehem in I Chronicles 2:51.

Abraham's people were Horites, a caste of ruler-priests who originated in the Nile Valley. The Horites were devotees of Horus, who was called "lord of the sky." In ancient Egyptian HR means "the one on high." This has been found on Egyptian hieroglyphs at the beginning of dynastic civilization (c. 3000 BC). The Horites' totem was the falcon and their fire altars often were built in the shape of the falcon. These altars have been found wherever the Sudra established themselves. Images of Horus show him with the body of a man and the head of a falcon. The falcon was a symbol of divine kingship or deified rulers.

The Horite ruler-priests were regarded as deified "sons" of God. They are often called "gods" (elohiym) as in Exodus 22:28: "Thou shalt not revile the gods (elohiym), nor curse the ruler of thy people."

The word "Horite" takes many forms: Khar, Gur, Hur, Horonaim, Horoni, Horowitz, Horim, and Hori. Hori was the son of Lotan son of Seir whose descendants were the "lords of the Horites in the land of Seir" according to Genesis 36:20-29 and 1 Chronicles 1:38-42.


Related reading: The Origin of Castes; The Ethnicity of David and Abraham; Why Does Genesis Speak of Gods?

Iron Seeds from Heaven

$
0
0

Alice C. Linsley


Nature reported this week on the a study of 3,300 year old meteroritic iron beads found in Gerzah, a prehistoric cemetery about 40 miles south of Cairo.The Gerzeh bead (top) has nickel-rich areas, 
colored blue on a virtual model (bottom), indicating a meteoritic origin.

At el Gerzah around 300 graves were discovered in 1911-1912. Tombs 67 and 133 contained a total of nine iron beads. Analysis of the beads indicates that they were formed from surface iron deposited by meteorites.

The news has led to much speculation about prehistoric religion in the Nile Valley. Joyce Tyldesley, an Egyptologist at the University of Manchester, said, “The sky was very important to the ancient Egyptians.” Tyldesley, a co-author of the paper, goes on to make this unsubstantiated claim: “Something that falls from the sky is going to be considered as a gift from the gods.”

She is correct about the importance of the sky among prehistoric Nilotes and Afro-Arabians. However, she is unjustified in her claim that they were polytheists. This is an assumption, not a substantiated fact.

Campbell Price, a curator of Egypt and Sudan at the Manchester Museum, emphasizes that nothing is known for certain about the Egyptians’ religious beliefs before the advent of writing. Price is correct on this point. He then suggests that the significance of the iron beads might be understood in light of later Egyptian beliefs. He points out that during the time of the pharaohs, the gods were believed to have bones made of iron. Here Price slips into the same error as Tyldesley. They interpret prehistoric Nilotic religion through the lens of dynastic religion which blended elements from many traditions (syncretism).

Here Biblical Anthropology can provide valuable insight. Let us consider what is known and verified.


Iron associated with Horite rulers

All the iron artifacts come from the graves of rulers. Diane Johnson says, "Iron was very strongly associated with royalty and power."

Images from Nekhen, a 3,300 year old Horite shrine city, shown ruler-priests carrying flails and crooks and wearing iron beads around their necks. The flail and crook were the symbols of authority for the Pharaohs.

Given this information it is logical to conclude the religious context of those who wore these beads is reflected in the religion at Ne-khen. At Nekhen in Sudan the following discoveries have been made:


Solar symbolism

Nekhen is the oldest known Horite shrine. Votive offerings at Nekhen were ten times larger than the normal mace heads and bowls found elsewhere, suggesting that this was a very prestigious shrine. Horite priests placed invocations to Horus at the summit of the fortress as the sun rose.

Horus was regraded as the Seed of Ra, conceived by Hathor-Meri when she was overshadowed by the Sun. The Sun was the emblem of Ra, the supreme creator. For the prehistoric Nilotes, the Sun was the source of insemination and the iron beads were called beja (bija in Sanskrit), meaning seed or semen. In other words, there is no evidence of polytheism at Nekhen.

Hathor's totem was a cow and she is shown at Nile shrines holding her infant in a manger. Here we have elements of the Proto-Gospel and evidence that Messianic expectation is based on the Edenic Promise (Gen. 3:15) made to Abraham's Proto-Saharan and Nilotic ancestors. 

Aspects of the prehistoric Nilotic solar symbolism are found in the Bible and in historical texts. Psalm 92:2 describes the Lord as “a sun and a shield.” The Victory Tablet of Amenhotep III describes Horus as “The Good God, Golden [Horus], Shining in the chariot, like the rising of the sun; great in strength, strong in might…” (Tablet of Victory of Amenhotep III, J.H. Breasted, Ancient Records of Egypt, Part Two, p. 854).


Blood and crosses

The association of blood and crosses can be traced to prehistoric times. In the cosmology of the Nubian's southern ancestors blood was associated with crosses. This is evidenced on the Blombos Cave artifact found in southern Africa. It is a red stone etched with X around the edges. The Egyptian ankh is a cross.

Nobles were buried with red ochre at Nekhen. Red ochre symbolized blood and the hope of bodily resurrection. Abraham's Horite ancestors believed in the resurrection of the body and awaited a deified king who would rise from the grave and deliver his people from death. Horus was said to die and rise on the third day as the sun rises. 

Oh Horus, this hour of the morning, of this third day is come, when thou surely passeth on to heaven, together with the stars, the imperishable stars. (Pyramid Texts Utterance 667.1941b)

Horus was the guardian of the ancient Egyptian and Kushite kings from as early as 4000 B.C. The kings were perceived to be the representatives on earth of the Ruler of the universe, the “sons” of God. From the earliest Dynastic Period, the king's name was written in the rectangular device called a serekh, which depicted a falcon perched on a palace façade. Horus as guardian and deity was manifest within the palaces and the shrines as the king himself. The king’s “horus name” was associated with gold and the sun which is the meaning of the title “Golden Horus” in which a falcon appears on the hieroglyphic sign for gold.

Horus was sometimes shown with the sun as his right eye and the moon as his left. This reflects the binary distinctions that characterize prehistoric Nilotic religion. With the right eye Horus sees all things. His left eye is shown blood red, having been injured in combat. To gain salvation for his people, Horus sacrifices one eye.


Belief in bodily resurrection

Nekhen was a Horite shrine city dedicated to Horus whose totem was the falcon or hawk. Early dynastic Egypt adopted the Horite religion and never practiced cremation, as in the religions that seek to escape physical existence (samsara).

The oldest known painted tomb (Tomb 100) with plaster walls. It dates to between 3500 and 3200 BC. Pillared chapels also have been discovered. The pillar or benben was a symbol of resurrection. Benben is formed by the redoubling of the root bn, meaning to "swell forth" as the sun swells on the eastern horizon. The ancient Egyptian word for the rising sun is wbn.

Benben have been found from Nigeria to India, the length of the ancient Afro-Asiatic Dominion, which is older than the Vedic Age.

Recently discovered tombs of officials from the 4th Dynasty were surmounted by conical mounds or benben. These tombs, along with the royal tombs at Giza, indicate that the ancient rulers hoped to rise from the place of death as the sun rises.
The sema sign of ancient Egyptian rulers (shown right) is a type of benben and expressed the hope of bodily resurrection.

Likewise, the vav sign among Horite ruler-priests (Yaqtan, Yisbak, Yismael, Yacob, Yosef, Yeshua, etc.) also indicated the hope of bodily resurrection.


Circumcision

The largest flint knives, dating to ca. 3200 BC. These were for ritual use, including circumcision. The name Ne-Khen relates to the practice of circumcision. The Egyptian word for phallus was khenen (hnn). It is related to khenty, meaning "before" or "in front."


Tel Gezer relief (12th century BC)

Both males and females were circumcised, as is still the custom in Sudan. This reflects the binary framework of Nilo-Saharan thought. Male circumcision was seen as enhancement of maleness by the removal of the flabby foreskin. Female circumcision was seen enhancement of femaleness by the removal of the penis-like clitoris.

Flint or obsidian knives were used to perform circumcisions. These often had edges sharper than modern surgical steel. Flint workshops have been found throughout the Negev, suggesting that even after the production of iron tools, the flint knife was preferred for circumcision. Infection was less of a risk given the high saline composition of the flint.


A binary worldview

The prehistoric Nilotic worldview was binary, not dualistic. In a binary view one of the entities in a binary set is regarded on the basis of empirical observation to be superior in some way to the other. The sun is greater than the moon because it is the source of light whereas the moon's light is reflugent. Males are larger and stronger than females. The binary view pertains to gender, the distinction between heaven/sky and earth, and even to living organisms such as trees.

In Genesis 12:6 we read that Abraham sought guidance from the “moreh” or prophet when he pitched his tent at the Moreh’s Oak. Male prophets sat under firm upright trees such as oaks. These represent the masculine principle. Female prophets sat under soft trees with more fluid motion such as date nut palms. These trees are called "tamars" and they represent the feminine principle. Judges 4:4-6 says, “Deborah, the wife of Lappidoth, was a prophet who was judging Israel at that time. She would sit under the Palm of Deborah, between Ramah and Bethel in the hill country of Ephraim, and the Israelites would go to her for judgment."

Genesis 12 places the Moreh’s Oak at the sacred center between Ai and Bethel, on an east-west axis. Deborah's Palm was between Bethel and Ramah, on a north-south axis. Note the reversal of cardinal points and gender associations. This is typical of the binary system of the prehistoric Nilo-Saharans.

Ethics and Religious Practices of the Afro-Asiatics

$
0
0

Alice C. Linsley


"Afro-Asiatic" is a general yet useful term in speaking about some of the oldest human populations whose related languages are classified under this term. It identifies a diversity of peoples, castes, societies and territories that have linguistic affinity. Beyond this, there appear to be shared values, common moral laws, and a similar epistemology.

The peoples under consideration lived between 4500 and 1500 BC, although Vedic sources state that the "Saka" ruled several thousands of years longer. The Matsya Purana claims that the world belonged to Kushite Saka for 7000 years. If this is true, we must extend the range of their influence to about 8000 BC.

While the Saka are identified as "Kushites" that term is perhaps less useful than the term Afro-Asiatics. "Kushite" encompasses many Nilo-Saharan peoples and castes, including Biblical figures such as the kings listed in Genesis 4, 5, 10 and 11. A more accurate historical designation is "Nilo-Saharan."

Archaeology, linguistics, molecular genetics, and anthropology have begun to construct a cohesive picture of the Afro-Asiatics. It is generally agreed that their point of origin is the Upper Nile Valley and that they were masterful navigators of the great water systems of the Late Holocene. Using these water systems, sent-away royal sons dispersed and established new territories from the Horn of Africa to India. The earliest "kingdoms" of southern Arabia were ruled by Saka. These are recognized as the ancient seats of wisdom by Biblical writers.

The rulers and sent-away sons built cities on high places with natural water sources and maintained water shrines along great rivers. The shrines were under the direction of a caste of ruler-priests who have been variously called Opiru, Hapiru, and Habiru (Hebrew) in ancient texts. In Genesis these are the Horite ruler-priests whose lineage is presented in Genesis 36 and they are described as having a red skin tone. Likely they are the descendants of Red Nubians.

Red and black Nubians
Detail from a Champollion drawing

Solar symbolism of Horites
In the Mahabharata, Saka-dvipa is identified as the land of the Sakas whose religious practices and cosmology were centered on the solar arc. O-piru in fact refers to attendants or priests at sun temples. The O here is a solar symbol rather than a letter. Not surprisingly, the oldest Afro-Asiatic monuments reveal alignments that express reverence for the sun.

The diffusion of common religious practices and ethical views is most logically explained by the dispersion of Kushite peoples out of Africa. This dispersion, described in Genesis 10, has been scientifically verified.


Bloodshed: The first moral law

Among the ancient Afro-Asiatics there was anxiety about the shedding of blood. They regarded the shedding of blood to be a moral issue of the first magnitude. Blood was conceived as the substance of life, with the power to bring blessings or curses upon those who were responsible for the shedding of blood. Such blood anxiety required the ministrations of mediators such as priests and shamans.

Before the hunting party departed, the priest or shaman offered sacrifice to the spirits of the hunted animals. When someone killed another human by accident, the killer was to provide an animal to be sacrificed in his place and was to pay satisfaction to the victim’s family. If he killed on purpose, he would forfeit his life. All of these decisions were governed by laws that were passed from generation to generation and upheld by the rulers and their advisors.

There was anxiety about the blood shed by women in their monthly cycle and in childbirth. For this reason it was common for women to remain in structures outside the village during menstruation and childbirth. Female family members brought them food and other necessary provisions. After ritual purification, the women returned to their regular routines in the village. Women of the noble classes remained in their chambers where female servants provided all their needs.

Among ancient peoples religious laws governed every aspect of the community’s life. The laws found in Leviticus and in the ancient Vedic Brahmanas are examples. Here we read instructions for how lepers are to be put outside the community and restored to the community after they are healed. Many of the laws govern family relations, forbidding incest and adultery. Others establish rules for the proper treatment of slaves, foreigners, widows and orphans.

The clay tablet of the code of Ur-Nammu from the reign of King Shulgi is dated to 2095-2047 BC It originally held 57 laws which covered family and inheritance law, rights of slaves and laborers, and agricultural and commercial tariffs. This code prescribes compensation for wrongs, as in this example: "If a man knocks out the eye of another man, he shall weigh out one-half a mina of silver." (Biblical Archaeology Review, Vol. 28, Sep/Oct 2002, p. 30.)


Ethics in the Afro-Asiatic Dominion

The Code of Hammurabi dates to about 1750 B.C. Hammurabi was an Amorite (Semite) who became King of Babylon about the time that Abraham left his father’s house in Harran and settled in the land of Canaan. The ancient capital of Babylon was about 55 miles south of modern Baghdad and it was large city of the Fertile Crescent. Although the city states of the Fertile Crescent shared common ideas and practices, these cities were not unified under a single ruler. Instead they were governed by independent rulers who were often related by marriage. Marriage was a way to form political alliances, and contribute to the preservation of the people’s cultural heritage.

Rulers of the Afro-Asiatic Dominion governed territories extending from the Atlantic coast of modern Nigeria to the Indus River valley of India. They spoke languages in the Afro-Asiatic language family and controlled commerce on the waterways. The Afro-Asiatic world was a river civilization that disappeared when earth’s climate changed. Today central Africa, Palestine, Mesopotamia and India are dry, but 10,000 to 12,000 years ago these areas were wet and fed by rivers many miles wide. The basins of these now extinct or much diminished rivers have been identified by satellite photos. Many of the laws of the Afro-Asiatic Dominion pertain to commerce and water rights.

Rulers controlled the major water systems of the ancient world at a time when Africa and Asia were much wetter. These rulers were owed tribute for maintaining order on the rivers. Royal priests maintained shrines on the rivers where the tribute was collected, a portion being offered to the shrine deity. As the climate changed the landscape of the ancient world, some of the laws changed also. For example, strangers who came to wells or watering holes in now arid lands were no to be harmed or taxed. Wells and public watering holes became, by law, places of immunity. This was all the more necessary since they were frequented by women and children, whose job it was to draw water.


A binary versus a dualistic worldview

The ancient Afro-Asiatics had a binary worldview based on their acute observation of the patterns in nature. The binary worldview hinges on binary sets that are observed by all people at all times and in all places (universal structure/pattern). Binary sets are objective, not subjective.

The French anthropologist Claude Lévi-Strauss believed that the primitive mind and the modern mind are shaped by the same structures. Lévi-Strauss is the central figure in Structuralism. He described structuralism as “the search for unsuspected harmonies” across cultures. He showed that qualities experienced binary opposites, like raw and cooked, reveal a network of abstract relations which form a coherent system of thought or a worldview.

Another example of a binary set is male/female. All humans are born either male or female. The number of incidents of genitally-confused births is very rare and those born with such conditions know their gender. Often their condition can be corrected through surgery and hormone therapy.

Binary sets require that we make distinctions between two seemingly opposite entities. This does not mean that every set of opposites is a binary set, however. Only sets which are universal and objective are binary sets. Tall-short and talent-untalented are subjective and therefore do not represent binary sets.

Among the ancient Afro-Asiatics the key binary sets were: male-female; sun/day-moon/night, heaven-earth, God-Man; and the directional poles east-west and north-south. The ruler was associated with the sun and his skin was sun darkened. His queen was associated with the moon and appeared in public with her skin covered in white power.

In a binary worldview one of the entities in the set is regarded as superior in some way to the other. The entities of the binary have a relationship of dominance and subservience. The sun is greater than the moon because the sun gives light whereas the moon merely reflects the sun’s light. Males are larger and stronger than females. Heaven is more glorious than earth, and God is far greater than Man. This view is different from the dualism that characterizes most Asian religions. Dualism is the belief that reality is comprised of two different yet equal principles: material and non-material, light and dark, good and evil, female and male, etc. The ying-yang symbol does not represent the oldest worldview.

Sometimes the language of a binary set is used to speak of a greater whole. Male and female can refer to all humanity. In Genesis 1:1 we read that God created "the heavens and the earth." This is called a “merism” and it means that God created the whole universe. In Psalm 139, the psalmist declares that God knows "my sitting down and my rising up.” This is to say that God knows all the psalmist's actions. The phrase “good and evil” – as in “the tree of the knowledge of good and evil” - is a merism whereby a metaphysical binary set refers to all that can be known. Eve is tempted to eat of this tree so that she might become like God, knowing all things.

In a binary system meaning also is derived from reversals such as switching directional poles or gender associations. Reversal is when the subordinate entity is granted a place of dominance. In ancient mysticism, the reversal of north and south, that is, moving south to the north position, meant that the feminine principle is set in motion. This spoke of fertility, conception, birth and new life.

In Genesis 12:6 we read that Abraham sought guidance from the “moreh” or prophet when he pitched his tent at the Moreh’s Oak. Male prophets sat under firm upright trees such as oaks. These represent the masculine principle. Female prophets sat under soft trees with more fluid motion such as date nut palms. These trees are called "tamars" and they represent the feminine principle. Judges 4:4-6 says, “Deborah, the wife of Lappidoth, was a prophet who was judging Israel at that time. She would sit under the Palm of Deborah, between Ramah and Bethel in the hill country of Ephraim, and the Israelites would go to her for judgment."

Genesis 12 places the Moreh’s Oak at the sacred center between Bethel and Ai, on an east-west axis. Deborah's Palm was between Ramah and Bethel, on a north-south axis. Note the reversal of cardinal points and gender associations. This is typical of the binary system of the ancient Afro-Asiatics.

The Tree of Life was said to be in the middle of the garden. If the sacred center is the place where the east-west axis and the north-south axis intersect, we have the image of the Cross.


Afro-Asiatics and the role of morehs or prophets

The evidence of archaeology and anthropology suggests that the water shrine was the place were wisdom and council was sought by Afro-Asiatics and Indo-Europeans. The seers or prophets included female. Themistoclea and Deborah are an examples. They served similar functions in their communities, but their practices and worldviews were different. Themistoclea represents the shamanistic approach and Deborah represents an approach in which consultation of spirits and trace states was forbidden.

The Biblical prophet was forbidden from consulting spirits. Indeed Saul's rejection as king over Israel was due in part to his consulting a medium. The Biblical prophets knew what shamans worldwide know - that the spirits sometimes lie. Therefore they were to consult only the Spirit of God (Ruach) who moved over the waters at the beginning and know all things, and cannot lie.

The Wisdom Tradition of the Bible represents a very ancient approach to epistemology. This is evident is such books as Job, Proverbs, Sirach and Baruch. Wisdom as a feminine principle is sometimes called the “Sophia” tradition. Sophia is the Greek word for wisdom and it is based on objective observation of the order of creation.

Likewise, Themistoclea represents an epistemology that wedded experience, reason and the observation of order in Nature. As the prophetess of Apollo at Delphi she would have been a source of much ancient wisdom, including knowledge of the natural world, astronomy, medicine, music, mathematics, animal husbandry and philosophy. She would have offered advice pertaining to the time for sowing and harvests, whether to go to war, and who and when to marry.

Shrine prophets were often deified, either posthumously or during their lifetimes. The Hebrew (habiru) righteous ones were regarded as deified (elohiym). The plural form for deity appears in Genesis 1: In the beginning elohiym created the heavens and the earth. The word also appears in Genesis 6:2, which speaks of the "sons of the elohiym" who took wives from the daughters of men. The plural form relates to the ancient Horites from whom we receive the material in Genesis. They are the origin of Israel's priesthood and why Jews call their ancestors horim.

The Horite ruler-priests were regarded as deified "sons" of God. They served as the wise ones and advised the great kingdom builders of old. As such, they are considered gods, as in Exodus 22:28: "Thou shalt not revile the gods (elohiym), nor curse the ruler of thy people."


Related reading: Ethics and Binary Oppositions; Moral Obligation; Women Prophets and Shamans; Righteous Rulers and the Resurrection; Levi-Strauss and Derrida on Binary Oppositions; The Genesis King Lists; The Kushite Marriage Pattern Drove Kushite Expansion


The Binary Aspect of the Biblical Worldview

$
0
0
By Alice C. Linsley
Special to virtueonline
www.virtueonline.org
July 12, 2013

"All my life I have loved edges; and the boundary-line that brings one thing sharply against another."--G.K. Chesterton (Autobiography)

"Limitation as limitation is good. Any limitation makes something, as an outline takes some shape. This is the true and thrilling meaning of the tale of Adam and Eve. God put something forbidden in their garden because without limit things are without form and void. The dark stem of the strange tree threw up all the green and gold. But they clamoured for 'infinity'... They destroyed the outline of Eden. They ate the one thing that kept everything else sacred. Immediately they had everything and therefore nothing."--G.K. Chesterton (From the Notebooks of G.K.C, The Tablet, 4 April 1953)

The Biblical worldview has a binary feature that is expressed in the language of the Biblical writers. This worldview distinguishes the Biblical belief system from Asian dualism. In a dualistic worldview the entities of the binary set are regarded as complementary and equal. This is symbolized by the ying-yang.

In dualism, reality is comprised of opposite but equal principles (male-female, night-day, spirit-matter, heaven-hell, God-man). One entity in the set is no greater than the other. The idea of divine condescension is meaningless in this context, as is the idea of God entering history.


Read it all here.


Does the Binary Feature Signal Greater Complexity?

$
0
0

Alice C. Linsley


Biblical Anthropology delves into the oldest layers of the biblical material looking for information that is anthropologically significant in reconstructing cultural antecedents. This approach has proved extremely useful in gaining a clearer picture of Abraham's Nilo-Saharan ancestors. A fascinating aspect of their worldview is its binary feature, which I discuss here.

This binary feature has been studied by other anthropologists, the most famous of whom is Claude Lévi-Strauss who observed binary thinking among preliterate Amazon tribes. In his book, Le cru et le cuit, Strauss explores cultural perceptions of natural/raw-prepared/cooked, and other oppositions within primitive cultures.

Lévi-Strauss dedicated himself to searching for the "underlying patterns of thought in all forms of human activity." He argued on the basis of his anthropological findings that the primitive mind has the same structures or patterns as the civilized mind. These observations culminated in his famous book Tristes Tropiques, which positioned him as the central figure in the structuralist school.

Levi-Strauss and others have noted that the binary sets are the basis of complex thought about the world. Similarly, computer science demonstrates that great complexity emerges from binary language.

Abraham's Nilo-Saharan ancestors named in the the Genesis king Lists observed binary sets in the order of creation, such as east-west, male-female, day-night, dry-wet, raw-cooked, life-death, and heaven-earth. Further, they observed these binary sets as a fixed or unchanging reality. We might speculate that this fixed binary feature led to the metaphysical conception of the Creator as immutable, but we would be getting ahead of ourselves.

The question is whether there is evidence in the history of biological life on Earth for binary features being antecedent to the emergence of greater complexity?

The fossil record certainly suggests that this is the case. In the Precambrian organisms we find neither bilateralism nor any bivalves. Once these features emerge we begin to see greater diversity and complexity (the so-called Cambrian "explosion" which lasted 90 million years).

Among archaic humans we find both bilateralism and a bicameral brain. Add to this the ability to observe binary sets and ponder relationships. The smallest brained Australopithecus would have noted the distinctions of night-day and raw-cooked. He also would have recognized a mystery in that there are in-between moments. There is that mysterious moment just before dawn and that moment when the food is no longer raw, yet not quite cooked. He would have observed that the Sun always rises over a mountain in the east and casts the mountain's shadow, yet there are no shadows when it is directly overhead. Thus to the binary aspect is added an in-between category and the recognition of something mysterious.

Lucy's brain was small, but with both anatomical and external binary features, she had the basis for more complex thought such as mentioned above.

Additionally, there is another level of complexity that emerges from recognition of binary sets. It is synecdoche in which totality is expressed by contrasting parts. This is expressed in figures of speech such as: "I searched high and low" or "He worked day and night." These merisms reflect greater complexity of thought, yet synedoche is found in the oldest layers of the Genesis material, as has been observed by Cyrus Herzl Gordon. He notes that the phrase “good and evil”( טוֹב וָרָע ) is a merism and this is verified by the context. The serpent urges Eve to eat of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil so that she might become like God who knows everything (Gen. 3:1-5).

Brain size, therefore, is likely over-estimated in assessments of the complexity of thought among archaic humans. Why not direct attention to the discovery of evidence of recognition of binary features and the emergence of complex thought among archaic humans? This is right up Biblical Anthropology's alley!


Related reading: The Binary Aspect of the Biblical WorldviewLevi-Strauss and Derrida on Binary Oppositions; Was Lucy Human?; Meat Consumption Three Million Years Ago


Is "Good and Evil" a Biblical Merism?

$
0
0

Good and evil spelled in the same image

The phrase "good and evil" suggests dualism. I prefer the New Jerusalem Bible which has this: "knowing good from evil" (Gen. 3:5). This more accurately represents the binary worldview of the Bible.


Alice C. Linsley

A merism is a figure of speech which references an experience using a phrase that enumerates several of its parts. To say that “they searched high and low” is to mean that they searched everywhere. When we speak of night and day, we are speaking of two experiences with a range of in-between experiences that we call “dawn” and “dust”. Often the sets are used to express the whole range of experience. For example, the expression “night and day” represents a 24-hour cycle.

In Genesis 1:1 we read that God created "the heavens and the earth." If "heavens and earth" is a merism, this refers to the whole cosmos. Likewise, in Psalm 139 the psalmist declares that God knows "my sitting down and my uprising up,” which is to say that God knows all the psalmist's actions.

Merisms are a convention of poetry and prose. A merism is an example of synecdoche in which totality is expressed by contrasting parts" (e.g. high and low, young and old). In this figure of speech a pair of opposites refers to something greater than the constituents, as in the phrase, "they searched high and low," meaning that they searched everywhere.

Cyrus Herzl Gordon suggested that the biblical phrase “good and evil”( טוֹב וָרָע ) is a merism. Good and evil – as in the tree of the knowledge of good and evil - expresses a pair of opposites that refers to something greater than themselves. The tree symbolizes all that can be known. That a merism is intended is made evident from the context of the narrative. The snake tells the woman that by eating of the forbidden fruit her eyes will be opened and she will become like gods, knowing good and evil (Gen. 3:5) Adam and Eve were barred from eating this fruit because such a property rightly pertains to God alone.

Merisms are common in the Bible, but not every binary set is intended to refer to something greater. Sometimes the stress is on the distinctions between the two entities. For example, "male and female" constitute the whole of humanity, but also the distinction between them. In the biblical worldview there is no gender continuum, there is male and female with distinct roles and functions necessary to human existence and survival. It is important to pay attention to context lest every binary set be taken as a merism.


Related reading: Binary Sets in the Ancient WorldLevi-Strauss and Derrida on Binary Oppositions; The Biblical Worldview is Binary; Heaven or Heavens: Does it matter?



Food Prohibitions and Religious Belief

$
0
0

Alice C. Linsley

Humans originated in Africa and the oldest known cohesive worldview to be identified through the study of ancient documents and artifacts is that of the Afro-Asiatics. Among them were temple and shrine attendants called Ha-piru or Ha-biru (Hebrew).

Among the Habiru were a caste of ruler-priests who were devotees of Horus, the son of Ra. These are called Horites. The oldest known site served by Horites was Nekhen (Hierakonpolis) in Sudan (4000-3000 B.C.). Votive offerings at the Nekhen temple were ten times larger than the normal mace heads and bowls found elsewhere, suggesting that this was a very prestigious site.

Nilo-Saharan women
riding cattle
This is also the point of origin of circumcision, animal sacrifice and the priesthood. The ancient Nilo-Saharan peoples enjoyed a wet Sahara and a wider Nile River. From here they spread far and wide, taking with them their languages and religious practices. These included certain food prohibitions and the veneration of the cow.

Anthropologists have gained insight into their beliefs by considering anthropologically significant data in the earliest biblical material. The early chapters of Genesis reveal that eating forbidden things was regarded as a serious violation of the order of creation. This is the likely background for the story of the forbidden fruit. The boiling of a baby goat in its mother's milk is prohibited three places in the Bible. This was regarded as especially heinous since if blurred the distinction between a life-giving substance and a life-taking action.

The message is that God established boundaries that humans fail to honor. Ancient food boundaries are still observed in Hinduism and in Eastern Orthodoxy which has long periods of fasting from meat and dairy.

Apparently, humans were never created to eat animals, but only plants, nuts, fruits and grains. In Genesis 1:29 we read that God told the first humans: "Behold I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in which there is the fruit of a tree yielding seed' for you it shall be for meat."

In Genesis 2:16-17 we read that the fruit of one specific tree was forbidden: the fruit of the tree of knowledge of good and evil. God said that to eat of this tree meant death, but the serpent contradicted God. Another tree was identified as the Tree of Life. This ancient motif is found along the Nile and in India.



Blood guilt associated with eating cows

Eating meat was granted by God to Noah after the flood. Genesis 9:2-6 explains that fish and beasts were permitted, but that there would be a blood guilt involved in taking these for food.


Hathor-Meri
"The fear of you and the dread of you shall be upon every beast of the earth and upon every bird of the heavens, upon everything that creeps on the ground and all the fish of the sea. Into your hand they are delivered. Every moving thing that lives shall be food for you. And as I gave you the green plants, I give you everything. But you shall not eat flesh with its life, that is, its blood. And for your lifeblood I will require a reckoning: from every beast I will require it and from man. From his fellow man I will require a reckoning for the life of man. Whoever sheds the blood of man, by man shall his blood be shed, for God made man in his own image."

In the ancient world blood was regarded as the elemental substance of life and cows were venerated as sacred. This originated among the Nilo-Saharans for whom cows were both wealth and a sacred symbol of Hathor-Meri, the virgin mother of Horus. She is shown in images with the Sun cradled in the curve of her horns. Hathor-Meri's totem was the longhorn cow and the Sun was the emblem of the Creator. The Angel Gabriel told the Virgin Mary that she would be overshadowed and would conceive the Holy One, the Son of God. Coincidental parallel? Not really. Messianic expectation originated with Abraham's Nilo-Saharan ancestors.

The Horites carried their beliefs to southern Pakistan and India. Their influence is found in the Harappa culture. Har-appa is Dravidian for "Horus is Father." This is why about cows are venerated by Hindus.


Related reading: Horite Expectation and the Star of BethlehemThe Origin of Animal Sacrifice; Early Metaphysics: Primal substance and cause; Jesus Fulfills the Horus Myth; Why Cows Were Sacred in the Ancient World

Biblical Anthropology and the Question of Common Ancestry

$
0
0

Alice C. Linsley


Since Biblical Anthropology concerns itself with cultural antecedents and human origins it is natural that a Biblical anthropologist would explore the question of common ancestry as it is posed by Evolution.

If humans and apes (or humans and pigs) share a common genetic ancestry there must certainly be evidence for that in the fossil record. Frankly, I do not see it. Instead, the evidence points to humans appearing suddenly and de novo about 4 million years ago. The Australopithecus afarensis and the more recent Australopithecus africanus show every evidence of being fully human despite the small cranium. I have argued here that, given the totality of other evidence that favors human identity, brain size is a less important indicator than the binary feature of the brain and of primitive thought.

For example, the cerebral hemispheres exhibit strong bilateral symmetry in structure and function. That said, the left hemisphere has some dominant features. The lateral sulcus generally is longer in the left hemisphere than in the right, and Broca's area and Wernicke's area are present only in the left hemisphere in greater than 95% of the population. Thus the human brain exhibits both functional and structural asymmetry in the binary feature.

Levi-Strauss and others have noted that the binary sets are the basis of complex thought about the world and a commonality among primitive peoples. Similarly, computer science demonstrates that great complexity emerges from binary language.

Abraham's Nilo-Saharan ancestors named in the the Genesis king Lists observed binary sets in the order of creation, such as east-west, male-female, day-night, dry-wet, raw-cooked, life-death, and heaven-earth. The regarded one of the entities of the set to be superior in some observable way than the other. The sun is greater than the moon. The male is large and stronger than the female. In other words, the binary feature of which I am speaking entails a greater-lesser aspect which is quite different from dualism.

The Yin Yang is often cited as an example of binary thinking, but as it is understood today it represents dualism. This was likely not the case originally. The yin-yang concept appears to be rooted in a much older binary framework related to the religion of Tian, the oldest name for the Creator in China. Tian means the Most High of the Anu. The Anu or Ainu did indeed hold a binary worldview which was based on their observations of the Sun. The Sun was held to be greater than the Moon, the light greater than the shadow. So in this view too, at least in its origin, there is dominance on one side.

Further, the Ainu whose great shrine city of Heliopolis was the point to which many ancient monuments aligned, appear to have regarded this binary feature as a fixed and unchanging characteristic of Nature. I'm wondering if indeed this is a general pattern in Nature?


Related reading: The Nilotic Origin of the Ainu; African Ancestry of Chinese; The Nile-Japan Ainu ConnectionBinary Sets in the Ancient World; A Kindling of Ancient Memory; The Binary Aspect of the Biblical Worldview; Questioning the Common Ancestry Hypothesis

Talking on Facebook about Biblical Anthropology

$
0
0

What follows is part of a Facebook conversation at Open Anthropology Cooperative (OAC). The people are reacting to my post on Genetic Risks in Cousin Marriage. The irony is that this same post was well received at another forum to which I belong which is mostly biologists and geneticists.

The conversation is fairly typical of the type of conversations I have with younger anthropologists or anthropology students at OAC. These have become jaded by materialist and atheist ideas. It is more civil than most because this young woman does not employ direct personal attack as did these young women.



  • Kate Wood Also, there are several theoretical problems in your post. First, what you're describing is patrilineal cross-cousin marriage, which is not the least bit unique. It's one of the foundations of kinship studies, basically. Second, it's not particularly defensible either that "Arab" is equivalent to "Muslim" or that Arabs are in general less exogamous than Jews. As a trivial example, the entire Berber population of Africa belies this assertion. I'm not commenting on the biblical aspects of this, though I don't actually recall there being that detailed a discussion of the methods by which brides were chosen. I really am interested in where this field has stemmed from, though.

  • Maria Mailat Do you read what translation, what édition of what Bible? I agrée with Kate Wood. It is very dangerous to hide your own idéology in the very superficial study without any anthropological fondation.

  • Alice Linsley Yes, Kate. Kinship analysis is a central aspect of Biblical Anthropology and critical to recovery of significant information about Abraham's Nilo-Saharan ancestors.

  • Alice Linsley Maria, Biblical anthropologists must use many translations and study many languages. I have studied biblical Hebrew, biblical Greek, Arabic, and Nilo-Saharan languages. This last group has been completely neglected in Near Eastern Studies which is one reason why Biblical Anthropology is important.

  • Alice Linsley Kate, please read the article again. You will see that I do not claim that patrilineal cousin marriage is unique. I claim that the Horite marriage and ascendancy pattern is unique. This pattern drove the Kushite expansion out of Africa.http://biblicalanthropology.blogspot.com/...

    biblicalanthropology.blogspot.com.au
    Applying Anthropology to the Bible ▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲

  • Kate Wood I don't have any need to read it again- I simply don't see how what you're claiming is the marriage pattern (which is actually indeterminable without actually talking to people; see Bourdieu's experience trying to rectify cross-cousin marriage with actual Kabyle practices), or how it drove anybody anywhere. I really just don't see what your theoretical basis or practical basis for analysis is.

  • Alice Linsley There is much here that would be of value to you, Kate. Perhaps you should pursue it further and keep an open mind.

  • Kate Wood Alice, can you spell out exactly what is of value? I'm interested in anthropology, not in biblical exegesis, which is what I see in your blog. There's nothing wrong with that, but it's not actually particularly valuable to me.

  • Alice Linsley Kate, we at least share an interest in anthropology and agree that it has value.

  • Kate Wood Do we? That's why I'm asking - I don't actually see an anthropological basis for your entry, and I'm wondering what it is. So far you haven't answered that, so I'm not sure what value you feel anthropology holds for your project.

  • Alice Linsley You simply want to argue.

  • Kate Wood No, I simply don't see how what you're doing is anthropology.

  • Alice Linsley How much of my research have you actually read?

  • Kate Wood I've looked at your blog. I can't actually find any published research, if you have links they'd be much appreciated.

  • Alice Linsley I have over 1600 published pieces. I'll be 64 in October and I have been pioneering the field of Biblical Anthropology for over 30 years. I actually have learned something in that time! : )

  • Kate Wood How old you are is immaterial, actually. It's a rather pointless appeal to authority, really. However, having just read your profile and learned that you are a self-described Christian apologist, I can see where you're coming from now. I think there's nothing more to find out. Thanks.

  • Alice Linsley You are the one who appealed to authority when you asked about publications. I was explaining why there may be some value in Biblical Anthropology. I am very public about my Christian commitment. I have no agenda, as you appear to assume. Your objection to my research touches on my use of the oldest material in the Bible to reconstruct antecedents. I also reference the sacred texts of Hinduism, Buddhism, Islam and the Babylonian and Jerusalem Talmuds. The oldest material in the Bible reflects a time before these books were scribed. Therefore, it is extremely useful in anthropological investigations of ancient Afro-Asiatic and Nilo-Saharan peoples.

  • Kate Wood My main objection to your research is that it repositions oral tradition and myth as history and proceeds from that basis, that it appears to use anthropology as a whitewash rather than a foundation, that you have yet to state a theoretical basis, source, or other authority other than yourself, and that the only "publications" I can find from you are blog posts of one type or another. A brief skim of your work suggests that these problems are endemic, and that the only anthropological evidence you use is twisted toward Christian apologetics. If that's what you want to do, that's fine, but to pretend you're not doing that is intellectually dishonest. I'm going to unfollow this now, since it's become clear that you're not going to support your arguments or provide other sources, which means it's not going to become useful or productive for either of us.

  • Nubian Captives

    $
    0
    0

    Alice C. Linsley

    In this detail taken from Treasures of Egypt and Nubia, we see a reproduction of a Ippolito Rosellini painting done during the 1825 Franco-Italian expedition to Egypt. Red and black Nubian captives are roped together and the rope is pulled by the Pharaoh whose back is shown at the bottom right.




    It is evident from another image that both red and black are bound.


    Incense burners found at Addi Akaweh in the Tigray region of Ethiopia bear an inscription that says the region was ruled by three kings jointly ca. 2800 years ago. They ruled with their queens over a population of black and red citizens. One commentators states that the Shebans were red (like the Ainu) and the Hebrews were black. This has not be verified. It seems more likely that Nubian parents often had children of different color. This happens even today and sometimes with twins.

    Genesis indicates that Esau was red. Was Jacob black?


    Notes on Sheba:

    The Queen of Sheba probably did not rule over the same territory as her very powerful ancestors named in Genesis. By the time of Solomon came to power Sheba's territory was diminished. David likely took control of some of those lands in the south. Remember, Sheba claimed to have a legitimate right to the throne in Jerusalem (and he probably did have a legitimate claim). He lost his life when he took refuge in the city of Abel Beth Maacah. He was beheaded there (2 Samuel 20:1-22).

    Beersheba means the Well of Sheba. It was a principal settlement and very old center for metal work. Jews will deny this since Abraham lived there, as did Isaac. They interpret Beersheba to mean the well of seven.

    Bilquis is mentioned in Yoruba lore. There are some problems with the alignments of the stories, however. A huge barrier wall has been discovered in Nigeria which the locals say is associated with Queen Bilquis. This seems to come from later Arabic sources though. I believe, however, the local people are correct in their association of the wall with the Shebans because they were kin to the Jebusites and the Ijebu still live in that place. Gen. 10 indicates that both the Shebans and teh Jebusties were Kushites. Jerusalem was originally a Jebusite or Ijebu shrine city. The Sheban (also spelled Sebans; Sabaeans) are clan of Joktan, son of Eber (Ebry) om Genesis 10:27-28). In Gen. 10:6-7 we find their ancestors are called Seba and Sheba and they are identified as Kushites. According to Vedic tradition, the Kushites ruled the ancient world for 7000 years.

    Jesus said, "The Queen of the South will rise up at the judgment with the men of this generation and condemn them, for she came from the ends of the earth to hear the wisdom of Solomon, and behold, something greater than Solomon is here." (Matt. 12: 42; Luke 11: 31)

    The Nubian Context of YHWH

    $
    0
    0

    Alice C. Linsley


    Over the centuries there has been much speculation as to the original cultural context of the tetragrammaton, the Divine Name revealed to the Israelites through Moses. The Name is given at Mount Horeb, a mountain sacred to the Midianites. The narrative starts with Moses shepherding the flocks of his father-in-law Jethro, the priest of Midian, and ends with the theophany of the burning bush (Ex. 3:14) in which God declares from the bush, "I am that I am" (Ehye aser ehye). The entire narrative is limited to the location of this mountain sacred to the Horites living in that region, one of them being Moses' father-in-law Jethro. His ruler-priest status is designated by the spelling of his name with the initial solar symbol: Yetro. Jethro is a descendant of Abraham by his cousin wife Keturah.

    In Exodus 3:14-15 we find the narrative as a polished national creed: "And Elohim said to Moses, Ehye aser eyhe. And he said 'You shall say to the sons of Israel Ehye has sent you.' And again Elohim said to Moses 'You shall say this to the sons of Israel, YHWH Elohi of your fathers, Elohi of Abraham, Elohi of Isaac and Elohi of Jacob, has sent me to you. This is my name forever and this is my title from generation to generation."Here the Divine Name is associated with another Divine Name: Elohi/Elohim, as in Genesis 24:7.

    It is evident from study of the tetragrammaton in other ancient references that the giving of the Divine Name at the burning bush does not represent a new development. It represents reaffirmation of received tradition from the Horim or Horites. Abraham bargains with YHWH over the fate of Sodom (Gen.18:1). Hagar the Egyptian recognizes her angelic helper as the angel of YHWH (Gen. 16:7). Abraham utters the Divine Name twice, in Genesis 24:3 and 24:7. In the latter instance he recognizes "YHWH Elohim" as the one who called him out of Mesopotamia. In Genesis Abraham's servant invokes the help of YHWH no less than ten times in his quest for Isaac's cousin bride.


    Extra-biblical inscriptions and archaeological finds

    Two hieroglyphic references dating to the New Kingdom period refer to “the land of the Shasu of YHWH.” These are the oldest references to YHWH outside the Bible. The "Shasu of Yhw" is found on inscriptions from the Nubian temples of Soleb and Amara West, and corresponds precisely to the tetragrammaton.

    Reproduction of the hieroglyphic inscription of YHWH dated to 1400 BC.
    Discovered in the temple at Soleb (Nubia) built by the Pharaoh Amenhotep III.

    Credit:  Benny Bonte

    Shasu may be a variant of Saka, another word for Horite royal priests among the Kushites. They originated in the Nile Valley, and as they dispersed out of Africa, they spread the Proto-Gospel across the vast Afro-Asiatic Dominion. The Matsya Purana claims that the Saka ruled the ancient world for 7000 years.

    The Shasu are definitively connected to the Horites of Seir in Edom (modern Jordan). Lists of place names in Nubian temples of Soleb and Amara West record six toponyms located in “the land of Shasu.” A monument of Ramesses II claims that he “has plundered the Shasu-land, captured the mountain of Seir” in Edom; a 19th Dynasty letter mentions “the Shasu-tribes of Edom” and Ramesses III declares that he has “destroyed the Seirites among the tribes of the Shasu.” Clearly, the Egyptians regarded the Shasu as a prominent part of the Edomite population which is described in Genesis 36.



     
    The Soleb (Sulb) temple, located on the left bank of the Nile just south of the Third Cataract, was built around 1400 BC by Pharaoh Amenhotep III (18th Dynasty). Amara West was the seat of the Egyptian administration of upper Nubia or Kush from the reign of Seti I (1306-1290 BC) onwards. The section of the Amara West topographical list which contains the reference to “the land of the Shasu of Yahweh" was copied from the earlier list at Soleb.

    Donald B. Redford writes of the Soleb reference to YHWH:

    For half a century it has been generally admitted that we have here the tetragrammaton, the name of the Israelite god "Yahweh;" and if this be the case, as it undoubtedly is, the passage constitutes the most precious indication of the whereabouts during the late 15th century BC of an enclave revering this god.

    Soleb was a Horite "enclave" as were many other temples of the Upper Nile. Egyptologists recognize that the temples at Nekhen and Soleb served as the pattern for later temples. Both temples were dedicated to Ra and Horus, and their royal priests were devotees of Horus. Thus, they are called "Horites" in the Bible. These priests dispersed across the ancient world. Genesis 36 speaks of the clans of Seir the Horite who were living in Edom.

    Moses' father was a Horite priest and the priest Jethro was likely his brother-in-law. We should not be surprised that YHWH is associated with Moses. Moses and his family were Horites. This has been confirmed through analysis of the marriage and ascendancy structure of Moses' father, which is distinctively Horite.

    The Divine Name is also found at the Almaqah temple in the Ethiopian Highlands. This dates between the 8th and 6th centuries BC and was constructed on the ruins of an earlier Nubian structure. The sacrificial altar found at Almaqah bears a 7th century BC inscription with the name of Yeha (YH). As this was a mountain shrine with an elevation well above the Nile floodplain there is no w as in the tetragrammaton.The w was a symbol for the Nile River.

    The Horites were a caste of ruler-priests who were known in the ancient world to be concerned with ritual purity, sobriety and religious devotion. They were shepherds who sacrificed animals from their own flocks. They were not polytheistic. They believed in a single Creator whose son was Horus (HR), and they spoke of the Father and Son as equals.

    As for the designation "I am" this was how Horus describes himself in the Coffin texts (passage 148): "I am Horus, the great Falcon upon the ramparts of the house of him of the hidden name. My flight has reached the horizon. I have passed by the gods of Nut. I have gone further than the gods of old. Even the most ancient bird could not equal my very first flight. I have removed my place beyond the powers of Set, the foe of my father Osiris. No other god could do what I have done. I have brought the ways of eternity to the twilight of the morning. I am unique in my flight. My wrath will be turned against the enemy of my father Osiris and I will put him beneath my feet in my name of 'Red Cloak'." (Myth and Symbol in Ancient Egypt by R.T. Rundle Clark, p. 216)

    Here we find the words of Psalm 110:1, from David. The LORD says to my Lord: "Sit at My right hand until I make Your enemies a footstool for Your feet."

    The Horites believed that the sun inseminated the earth. As it rose and swelled in strength it generated life and health on earth. The Creator appointed His servants by the overshadowing of the sun. Those many of the names of the Horite rulers begin with the solar symbol Y. They also expected a woman of their ruler-priest lines to be overshadowed and to conceive the "Seed" of God (Gen. 3:15). She was called Hathor-Meri and she is shown on ancient Nilotic monuments crowned with the long horns of a cow in which the sun rests.

    Hathor-Meri was the Patroness of the mines at Timna, the site of the world's oldest copper mines. A temple dedicated to Hathor was discovered at the southwestern edge of Mt. Timna by Professor Beno Rothenberg of Hebrew University.

    The smelting works, slag, and flints at Timna were found to be identical to those discovered near Beersheba where Abraham spent his last days. The metal workers of Timna and the metal workers of Beersheba were kin and the patroness of their mining and smelting operations was the virgin mother of Horus who was worshiped by the Horites. In other words, these were Horite metal workers. Rothenberg concluded that the peoples living in the area were "partners not only in the work but in the worship of Hathor." (Rothenberg, Timna, p. 183)

    The Horites believed that Horus was born at the winter solstice because from that day forward the Sun grows in strength. The ancient Egyptian ritual involved placing a male baby before the image of Hathor-Meri (later called Isis) and the priests placed gifts before the "divine son."

    Solar symbolism is found also in relationship to the death and resurrection of Horus. The Horite priests led the people in a 2 day fast to mourn Horus’ death at the hands of his brother. At dawn on the third day, they put away their mourning clothes and dressed for the feasting that took place after seed was sown in the fields with prayers led by the priests. The seed symbolized new life. Some believe that Jesus claimed to be the fulfillment of Horite expectation when, in speaking of the manner of his death, he said, “unless a seed falls into the ground and dies” it cannot give life. (John 12:24)


    YHWH is not a Name

    Y H W H is not a name for the Creator as much as it is a description. The Y indicates the Creator as universal ruler who appoints His earthly representatives. This Y is a sun cradle and designates many Biblical ruler: Yishmael, Yitzak, Yacob, Yosef, Yetro, Yeshua, Yaqtan and Yishbak. So the Y speaks of sovereignty and divine power.

    The two H's represent Horus of the Twin Horizons. In fact, the words "horizon" and "hour" are derived from the name Horus. He rides Ra's solar boat and makes his daily circuit from east to west, swelling each morning on the eastern horizon. The Horites were also known as Hapiru or Habiru (Hebrew). These words are related to the Arabic yakburu, meaning “he is getting big” and to the intensive active prefix: yukabbiru, meaning "he is enlarging." This is a reference to the morning ritual of Horite priests who greeted the rising sun in their temples, offered prayers, and watched as the sun expanded across the horizon.

    The Victory Tablet of Amenhotep III describes Horus as “The Good God, Golden [Horus], Shining in the chariot, like the rising of the sun; great in strength, strong in might…” (Tablet of Victory of Amenhotep III, J.H. Breasted, Ancient Records of Egypt, Part Two, p. 854).




    The W represents the Nile River, especially between the First and the Second Cataracts.  This region was called WaWaT. A sacred temporal and spatial center for the Nilotic Horites occurred daily when the sun rested directly over the Nile. The Egyptian word for the sun at its peak is wbn. Bn refers to pillars and the w refers to the Nile. Psalm 29:10 describes “Yahweh who sat as king upon the flood; He is king forever.” Malachi 4:2 uses similar language: “But for you who revere my name, the sun of righteousness will rise [swell] with healing in its wings.” The swelling of the sun speaks of God's power to generate life and health.

    Taking all the evidence together, it becomes clear that the original context of YHWH is Nilotic and that each glyph presents another feature of the God of the Horites.


    INDEX of Topics

    $
    0
    0

    INDEX  (Current as of 30 October 2013)


    Abraham

    The Calling of Abraham
    Abraham's Complaint
    Abraham, Descendant of Both Ham and Shem
    What Language Did Abraham Speak?
    Who Was the Bigger Liar, Abraham or Isaac?
    Were Abraham's Ancestors Rulers or Refugees?
    Abraham and Job: Horite Rulers

    Afro-Arabians

    Peleg: Time of Division
    Who Were the Dedanites?
    The Joktanite Tribes
    The Jebusites Unveiled

    Afro-Asiatics
    Ethics and Religious Practices of the Afro-Asiatics
    Afro-Asiatic Rulers and the Celestial Archetype
    Nimrod, an Afro-Asiatic Kingdom Builder
    Afro-Asiatic Kingdom Building
    The Afro-Asiatic Dominion
    The Spread of the Afro-Asiatic Worldview
    Afro-Asiatic Symbols that Speak of God


    Ainu, "First People"
    Does Genesis 10 Describe the Ainu Dispersion?
    The Nile-Japan Ainu Connection
    Abraham's Ainu Ancestors
    Ainu at Genetic Center
    A Kindling of Ancient Memory
    The Bible and the Question of Race


    Amorites
    The Amorites: Caste of Royal Scribes
    The Amorites: Aryan Canaanites?
    The Ar Clans


    Ancestor Veneration
    Teraphim: Idols or Ancestor Figurines?
    The Nephilim: Angels or Ancestors
    The Bosom of Abraham
    Recovering the African Background of Genesis


    Animals in the Bible
    The Ostrich in Biblical Symbolism
    Did Abraham's People Have "Easter" Eggs?
    Elephants in the Time of Abraham
    Abraham's Camels
    Dogs in the Bible
    Noah's Birds
    Jesus: From Lamb to Ram
    Animal Totems Used to Trace Ancestry


    Apocalyptic Literature
    The Seventh Seal and Silence in Heaven
    The Seven Bowls of Revelation 16
    Number Symbolism in Revelation
    The Dragon and the Beast of Revelation
    Revelation 12: The Woman, The Child, and the Dragon
    The Signs of Revelation 12
    Christ's Message to the Seven Churches


    Ascendancy Patterns


    Astronomy
    The Celestial Dance Observed by the Magi
    The Sun and Moon in Genesis
    Ancient African Astronomers
    Reality is Cross Shaped


    Bethlehem
    Which Bethlehem was Jesus' Birthplace?
    Bethlehem in the Time of Abraham
    Horite Expectation and the Star of Bethlehem
    Middle Bronze Age Tomb Found in Bethlehem


    Biblical Anthropology
    Talking on Facebook about Biblical Anthropology
    Biblical Anthropology and the Question of Common Ancestry
    Biblical Anthropology is Science
    Is Biblical Anthropology an Oxymoron?
    Biblical Anthropologists Discuss Darwin
    The Bible and Anthropological Investigation
    What Does a Biblical Anthropologist Do?
    Biblical Anthropology and Antecedents
    Derrida and Biblical Anthropology
    Charles Kraft on Why Few Christians Are Cultural Anthropologists
    Dean Arnold on Christian Anthropologists


    Biblical Names
    The Nubian Context of YHWH
    An African Reflects on Biblical Names
    African Naming Practices
    Is Enoch a Royal Title
    Conversation about Hausa Origins
    Conversation about Igbo Origins


    Biblical Worldview
    The Biblical Worldview
    The Sacred Center in Biblical Theology


    Binary Distinctions
    Does the Binary Feature Signal Greater Complexity?
    The Binary Aspect of the Biblical Worldview
    The Importance of Binary Distinctions
    Binary Sets in the Ancient World
    Circumcision and Binary Distinctions
    Blood and Binary Distinctions


    Blood Symbolism
    Comparing Cosmologies to Trace Origins
    Blood and Crosses
    Water and Blood
    Mining Blood
    The Blood of Jesus
    The Pleromic Blood and Gender Distinctions
    Blood and Binary Distinctions


    Cain
    Who Did Cain Marry?
    Cain as Ruler


    Castes
    Evidence of Castes in the Book of Ruth
    The Origin of Castes


    Christ in Biblical Anthropology
    The Eternal Son Comes Down From Heaven
    The Christ as Alpha and the Omega
    The Risen Christ in Genesis


    Climate
    When the Sahara was Wet
    Genesis and Climate Change
    Water Systems Connected Nile and Central Africa
    Climate Cycles and Noah's Flood
    The Jordan River in Abraham's Time


    Cosmology
    Comparing Cosmologies to Trace Origins
    The Cosmology of Abraham's People
    Biblical Cosmology and Ethics


    Death
    Gathered to His people
    The Bosom of Abraham
    Sheol and the Second Death


    Derrida, Jacques
    Derrida and Biblical Anthropology
    Levi-Strauss and Derrida on Binary Oppositions


    Deborah
    The Judges Samuel, Deborah and Huldah
    Deborah the Warrior Bee
    The Precedent for Women Rulers in Ancient Egypt


    Eber
    Who Was Eber?
    Noah's Sons and Their Descendants


    Ecclesiasticus (Wisdom of Ben Sirach)
    The Chiastic Center of Ecclesiasticus
    The Wisdom of Jesus Ben Sirach


    Egypt
    Ancient Egyptian Lexicon
    Etymology of the Vav
    Egypt in the Christmas Narrative
    Exploring Hosea 11:1 - "Out of Egypt"
    The Sudanese Origins of Pharaonic Egypt
    Egypt in the Book of Genesis
    Ancient Egyptians Were Seafaring
    Medical Care in Ancient Egypt
    The World's Oldest Book Found in Egypt


    Ethnicity
    The Ethnicity of David and Abraham
    Who Were the Kushites?
    Ashkenazi Represent Judeo-Khazar Admixture
    Were the Natufians Kushites?
    The Bible and the Question of Race
    Who Were the Horites?
    What Color Was Abraham?
    Abraham and the Mahra/Masek


    Eve in the Bible
    The Biblical Meaning of Eve
    Eve's Sin


    Ezekiel
    Ezekiel's New Temple


    Food
    Food Prohibitions and Religious Belief
    Why Cows Were Sacred in the Ancient World


    Genesis (Book)
    Index of Topics on Genesis


    Hebrews (Book)
    Paul to Hebrew Christians: Hold Fast the Faith of Your Horim
    Paul to Hebrew Christians: Persevere in Hope
    Hebrews 10: Christ's All Sufficient Sacrifice


    Horites
    Who Were the Horites?
    Horite Temples
    The Nubian Context of YHWH
    Tracing the Horites in History
    Jesus' Horite Lineage
    Samuel's Horite Family
    The Men Who Spied on Canaan


    Hosea
    Exploring Hosea 11:1 - "Out of Egypt"


    Human Origins
    Overview of Human Origins
    A Scientific Timeline of Genesis
    Genesis and Genetics
    Q and A on Creation and Evolution
    Is Genesis Really About Human Origins?
    Getting the facts About Human Origins


    Jebusites
    The Jebusites Unveiled
    Jerusalem Under the Jebusites
    The Jebu, Sheba, Joktan Confederation
    The Priestly Order of Melchizedek


    Jesus
    Jesus' Horite Lineage


    Jerusalem
    The Jerusalem that David Knew
    Jerusalem Under the Jebusites


    Jews
    Ashkenazi Represent Judeo-Khazar Admixture
    Sub-Saharan DNA of Modern Jews


    Job
    Abraham and Job: Horite Rulers
    Righteous Job and His Kin
    Job's Friends and Their Contribution to the Message of Job


    Joshua
    The Men Who Spied on Canaan


    Judaica
    Did Jews Live in Dynastic Egypt?
    Challenge to Shaye Cohen's Portrayal of Abraham as the First Jew
    Member of Israel's Parliament Destroys Bible
    Rabbi Hirsch on the Nations
    The Talmud on the Virgin Mary
    Talmudic Legend vs Biblical History


    Judges
    The Scatter-Gather Motif in Judges


    Hazor
    Hazor's Destruction: Another Theory


    Kinship Analysis
    Lamech Segment Analysis
    The Cousin Bride's Naming Prerogative
    The Pattern of Two Wives
    Analysis of the Genesis 4 and 5 King Lists
    The Lines of Ham and Shem Intermarried
    Kain and Seth Married the Daughters of Nok
    Methuselah's Wife
    Noah's Sons and Their Descendants
    Abraham's First-Born Son
    The Genesis King Lists
    Joseph's Relationship to Mary


    Kushites
    Identifying King Tut's Father
    Royal Prayers
    The Kushite Marriage Pattern Drove Kushite Expansion


    Melcizedek
    The Lineage of Melchizedek
    The Order of Melchizedek


    Migration
    The Migration of Abraham's Ancestors
    DNA Research Confirms Kushite Migration
    Does Genesis 10 Describe the Ainu Dispersion?


    Moses
    Moses' Horite Family
    Moses' Wives and Brothers
    Mosaic Authorship?
    Moses and Abraham: Different Origins of Israel?


    Mythology
    The Christ in Nilotic Mythology
    Eliade Was Right About Celestial Archetypes
    The Mythological Core of Christianity
    Tehut's Victory Over Tehom
    Heaven or Heavens: Does It Matter?


    Nahor
    Are the Names Nahor and Nehesi Related?

    Nazareth
    The Priests of Nazareth


    Neolithic Industries and Technologies
    Wine Making
    Seeds from Heaven
    Neolithic Advancements Along the Nile
    Afro-Asiatic Metal Workers


    Nubians
    The Nubian Context of YHWH
    Nubian Captives
    Nubians Brewed Beer with Tetracycline


    Number Symbolism
    Number Symbolism in the Bible
    Number Symbolism in Revelation
    Three Sons and The Son
    Is Gematria Helpful in Decoding the Genesis King Lists?


    Order of Creation
    Hierarchy in Creation
    Genesis and Genetics
    Plato and Intelligent Design


    Original Sin/Inherited Guilt
    Inherited Guilt of Infection of Death?
    What Happened in the Garden?
    Is "Good and Evil" a Biblical Merism?


    Paleolithic Industries and Technologies
    Mining Blood
    Paleolithic Industries at Jabal Harun (Aaron's Mountain)


    Priests
    Horite Priests and the Hapiru
    Who Were the Hapiru?
    Horite Territory
    The Origins of the Priesthood
    Abraham and Job: Horite Rulers
    Shepherd Priests
    The Horite Conception of the Priesthood
    God as Male Priest
    The Daughters of Priests
    Shamans and Priests


    Questions Asked
    Questions Asked by Primitive Man
    Questions High Schoolers Ask About Genesis
    More Questions About Sex


    Sacred Mountains
    Mount Mary and the Origins of Life
    Sacred Mountains
    Mount Moriah
    Mount Meru


    Samuel
    Samuel's Horite Family


    Seth
    The Ruler Seth
    Seth's Father and Abraham's Mother


    Sex
    Thoughts on Sex
    More Thoughts on Sex


    Tehom
    Tehom: Tihama of the Hadramout and Aden
    The Victory of Tehut over Tehom


    Totems
    Using Totems to Trace Ancestry and Marriage Ties
    Totemism in the Old Testament


    Tribes and Clans
    The Edomites and the Color Red
    Edom and the Horites
    Extant Biblical Tribes and Clans
    Jebusites: Extant Biblical Tribe
    The Peoples of Canaan
    The Clans of Ar


    Uniqueness of the Bible
    Sacred Writings and the Uniqueness of the Bible


    Water
    Water and Blood


    Wisdom
    Seats of Wisdom
    The Wisdom of Ben Sira
    The Chiastic Center of Ecclesiasticus


    Women
    Women Prophets and Shamans
    Sister Wives and Cousin Wives


    Elephants in the time of Abraham

    $
    0
    0

    Alice C. Linsley


    Fossil evidence indicates that the Asian elephant once roamed Syria, Mesopotamia, Persia, India, Sumatra, Java, Borneo and southern China. Elephant tooth and bone fragments found in Turkey, Syria and Lebanon indicate that elephants lived in that region in the latter part of the Bronze Age. These appear to have been wild herds.

    Elephant fossils found in Mesopotamia dating to the second millennium BC are thought to be the descendants of a smaller Pleistocene variety found throughout the Mediterranean about 2 million years ago. According to R.W. Rogers (A History of Babylonia and Assyria, Vol. 1, p. 284) “In very early times the elephant wandered at will over the Middle Euphrates country, but it disappeared before the 13th century.” However, textual evidence suggests that there were still some elephants being used as service animals after the 13th century B.C. Their remarkable trunks provided a powerful gripping organ for lifting and carrying timber and other heavy materials. Sargon would have used elephants to construct his cities and Abraham would have seen them in the region of Haran. Haran is where his father Terah died and his older brother Nahor ascended to the throne.

    The current distribution of elephants is greatly reduced compared to the time of Abraham. Today there remain only two species of elephants: the small-eared Indian elephant (Elephas maximus) and the long eared, long-legged African elephant ((Loxodonta africana). The Indian elephant has a bowed upper skull. There is a difference also in the number of toes.

    An older elephant species was smaller and more hairy. It had very curved, slender tusks and a more rounded head, suggesting a closer relationship to the African elephant. Such a creature appears on the tomb wall of Rekhmire (TT100). Rekhmire was Governor of Thebes during the reigns of Tuthmose III and Amenhotep II. At this time Egypt's empire extended into Syria. A wall painting in Rekhmire's tomb shows Syrians bringing tribute of carts, weapons, horses, a bear, and an elephant.


    Elephant painting in tomb of Rekhmire

    The Rekhmire tomb elephant likely depicts an extinct dwarf elephant with a shaggy coat. It is believed that some were still alive 4000-3500 years ago (Masseti 2001, 2008, Theodorou et al. 2007). This dwarf species is called Elephas tiliensis. It is shown on Rekhmire's tomb and a life-sized model of E. tiliensis is on display at the Palaeontology Museum of Athens. 

    The Rekhmire tomb elephant makes it clear that the Egyptians were familiar with the Syrian elephants known to Abraham in Haran.


    Elephants in Noah's time

    Noah lived approximately 2490-2415 B.C. in the region of Lake Chad, when the Sahara experienced a wet period (Karl W. Butzer 1966). This corresponds to the Old Kingdom, a time of great cultural and technological achievement. This places Noah in relatively recent history, not at the dawn of human existence.

    The oldest known zoological collection was found in Sudan during excavations at Hierakonpolis (Nekhen) in 2009. The royal menagerie dates to ca. 3500 BC and included elephants. Proto-Saharan and Nilotic rulers were known to keep ménageries. The animals were kept in pairs so that they would reproduce.

    In Noah's time Lake Chad sustained boating and fishing industries. The average fishermen used dugouts, but a ruler, such as Noah, would have owned boats constructed of reeds lashed together and sealed with pitch. Noah probably had a fleet of boats, and it is likely that elephants were used to carry the reed bundles.

    Horite Temples

    $
    0
    0

    Alice C. Linsley


    Archaeological evidence indicates that Horite temples, such as those found at Petra, and near the Amman airport, and at Shechem, were square with a "holy of holies" at the heart of the larger square. This holy space at the Amman airport temple was 6.50 meters wide (almost exactly 7 yards) and surrounded by a narrow corridor that was broken into six rooms of equal size. At the very center of the most sacred space was a round stone platform that either served as the pedestal of a stone pillar or as the base of an altar.

    Horite temples and shrines were located at water sources such as wells or along major rivers like the Nile. Cisterns have been found in many of the ancient temples. Solomon's temple had a cistern that held over 66,000 gallons of water (250 cubic meters).

    Typically, the interior floor of the Horite temple was paved and the walls were made of hewn stones. In the Horite temples along the Nile there were many pillars rather than stone walls. The temple at Onn (Heliopolis) is an example. Iunu means "place of pillars."

    However, evidence of stone pillars have been found at the temples in Amman and Shechem also. These served both as support for a roof and, in the case of the central area, a symbol of the strength of the Creator who inseminates the earth and by whom all life is generated. Likely the Apostle Paul had this tradition in mind when he wrote to Timothy that the Church of the living God is a pillar (I Tim. 3:15). Pillars in the temple also represented the righteous ones of God. Exodus 24:4 speaks of the twelve pillars in God's house as the twelve tribes upon which God has inscribed the holy Name.

    In ancient Egypt such pillars were called bnbn, related to the word wbn, a reference to the rising (swelling) of the morning sun. Bnbn have been found from Nigeria to India. Below is a photo of a bnbn found in Lejja, Nigeria.




    Sacred pillars represent the connection between heaven and earth (cf. ladder in Jacob's dream; the Church as pillar). In Horite temples these sometimes stood in the center of an outer courtyard. The foundation stone was about 2 feet 3 inches in diameter (70 centimeters) and the base of the pillar that rested on the stone pier was about 1 foot 4 inches (40 centimeters) in diameter. These smaller pillars were anointed, as Hindus anoint the lingam, an erect stone symbolizing the power of the Deity to generate life. Genesis 28:18 suggests this practice among Abraham's people: "Early the next morning Jacob took the stone he had placed under his head and set it up as a pillar and poured oil on top of it."

    In 1931, a structure with the characteristics of Horite temples was discovered by Gabriel Welter on the shoulder of Mount Gerizim at the site of ancient Shechem. That square temple also had a central holy space with a stone podium that possibly served as an altar. This temple was destroyed at the end of the Middle Bronze Age. The central space of the Gerizim temple was about twice as large as the central space in the temple excavated near the airport in Amman in 1955.


    Solomon's Temple

    Solomon's temple in Jerusalem was built on the pattern of the older Horite temples under the direction of Hiram of Tyre (I Kings 9:11, II Chronicles 2:3). King Hiram and David had a common Horite ancestry, as analysis of the royal names indicates. Hiram I of Tyre also had sent skilled artisans to help David build a palace in Jerusalem.

    Variants of the name Hiram include Horam and Harum, and all are related to the names Hur, Hor and Harun (Aaron). According to Midrash, Hur was Moses’ brother-in-law. Hur’s grandson was one of the builders of the Tabernacle. I Chronicles 4:4 lists Hur as the "father" of Bethlehem, also called "the city of David."

    Solomon's temple was arranged on an east-west axis as was typical of most Horite temples. The Horites regarded the sun as the symbol of the Creator and Hathor-Meri as the mother of the "seed" of God, Horus. The temple of Hathor-Meri at Timna was oriented to the rising sun at the winter solstice. This temple was discovered at the southwestern edge of Mt.Timna by Professor Beno Rothenberg of Hebrew University.

    The entrance to Solomon's temple was flanked by twin pillars dedicated to his Horite ancestors Jochin and Boaz. David and Solomon were of the Horite priestly lines that can be traced from Genesis 4 and 5 to Joseph who married Mary, the daughter of the shepherd-priest Joachim. Mary was "Miriam Daughter of Joachim Son of Pntjr (Panther) Priest of Nathan of Bethlehem." Long before the Pharaohs the Horites designated the king ntjr. P-ntjr means "God is King.


    Related reading: Iron Seeds from Heaven; Orientations of Nilo-Saharan Monuments; Why Jesus Visited Tyre; The Kenite-Horite Connection; Sacred Mountains and Pillars


    Which Bethlehem is Jesus' Birthplace?

    $
    0
    0

    Alice C. Linsley


    Bethlehem (Bēt Lahm) means "house of meat" and indicates a settlement known for sheep and cattle. There are two places called Bethlehem, one in Galilee and the other near Jerusalem. The name indicates a place where shepherd-priests took animals from their flocks to sacrifice. The meat was distributed to the needy.

    In Christian belief, Jesus is the Lamb of God who gave his flesh for the life of the world. He is the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world. His nativity was announced first to the shepherds of Bethlehem, the very descendants of the people in Eden to whom the promise of Messiah's appearing was first given (Gen. 3:15).

    David came from Bethlehem. He tended the sheep of his father, just as Moses tended the sheep of his priest father-in-law, Jethro. Jesus comes from a long line of shepherd-priests. His maternal grandfather was Yoakim (Joachim), a priest who kept flocks.

    Bethlehem was a Horite settlement according to I Chronicles 4:4 which names Hur (Hor) as the "father of Bethlehem." I Chronicles 2:54 gives Salmon as "the father of Bethlehem," but there is no contradiction here since Salmon was also a Horite. The names Salmon, Salma and Solomon were common names among the Horites, also know as Habiru (Hebrew). A leader named Salmon married Rahab of Jericho. He is listed as the son of Hur, another common Horite name.

    The Horites were a caste of ruler-priests whose origins can be traced back to the Nile Valley.  The oldest know Horite shrine city was Nekhen in Sudan (4500 BC). The temple there was dedicated to Horus, the son of Ra. He was said to be born of Hathor-Meri by the overshadowing of the sun, the emblem of the Creator Ra. She is shown in ancient images with a crown of horns - Y - a solar symbol. 

    From the Nile Valley, the Horites moved into Arabia, Canaan, and Mesopotamia, taking their religious beliefs and practices with them. Abraham, Jacob, Moses, Samuel, David and the Virgin Mary were of the Horite lines. David was from Bethlehem and Joseph went to Bethlehem to register for the census (Luke 1:26) because he and Mary were descendants of Horite ancestors who lived in Bethlehem. One of those ancestors was the righteous Boaz who married Ruth.

    The Bethlehem of Boaz was an agricultural area where grain was grown in extensive fields. This describes Galilee, not the hill country around Jerusalem.

    Bethlehem is where Ruth gave birth to Obed, King David's grandfather. Ruth is praised by the women of Bethlehem (the chorus) as being worth seven sons, and she is likened to Tamar who “built up” Judah by giving him twin sons Perez and Zerah. Judah gained these righteous sons after losing unrighteous sons.

    Throughout the book of Ruth there is a subtle play on the theme of replacement. Naomi is the female counterpart of Job. Both lost everything and came to despair, but the Lord restored their fortunes and made them great in Israel.


    Textual clues as to Jesse’s high standing in Israel

    David was anointed first in Bethlehem and later he was anointed in Hebron (II Samuel 2:1-4). Likely these two settlements marked the northern and the southern boundaries of Jesse’s territory. Jesse (Isai/Yesai) would have had a wife in Bethlehem and another in Hebron, following the practice of his Horite shepherd-priests ancestors who maintained two wives in separate households on a north-south axis. If David's Bethlehem was in Galilee, Jesse's territory would have extended about 118 miles (190 kilometers) from Bethlehem in Galilee to Hebron in the south, and all would have been regarded as a holding of Judah.

    Jesse’s name in Hebrew is Yesai and designates a great ruler. The initial Y is a solar cradle which indicates someone who has been overshadowed by the Creator. This overshadowing means the person is appointed for some special purpose. Remember that the Angel Gabriel announced to Mary that she would conceive by the overshadowing of the Spirit and bring forth the Holy One who would rule and save his people.

    Many other Biblical rulers are indicated by the Y symbol: Yitzak (Issac); Yishmael (Ishmael), Yaqtan (Joktan); Yisbak; Yacob (Jacob); Yosef (Joseph); Yetro (Jethro) and Yeshua (Joshua/Jesus). The men listed in Ruth 4 are royal persons and descendants of Abraham and his Horite ruler-priest ancestors. David was born into a family of very high standing and this prepared him for the years when he would serve King Saul and rule over Israel.

    It is evident that David was born into a family of very high standing and this prepared him for the years ahead when he would serve King Saul and rule over Israel.


    Connections to Egypt and Tyre

    Rachel was buried at Bethlehem. She gave birth to Joseph who married the daughter of the priest of Heliopolis in Egypt. Heliopolis (called Onn in Genesis 41:45) was a Horite shrine city of great prominence in the ancient world. The great pyramids of Giza, Saqqara and Abusir were aligned to the obelisk at this Ainu shrine city.



    If we draw a line from Heliopolis in Egypt to the shrine at Baalbek ("God of Beka") in Lebanon, we have a fairly straight diagonal line that extends from Abusir in Sudan to Baalbek.  Tyre was the main shrine city between Heliopolis and Baalbek. The earliest structure at Baalbek dates to at least 2900-2300 BC, corresponding to the Old Kingdom in Egypt. The builders were great stone masons and builders of temples and monuments.

    The kings of Tyre were Horites and kin to David.  Bethlehem of Galilee was part of ancient Tyre. In Mark’s Gospel, Jesus' true identity is recognized in the ancient island city of Tyre, not in Jerusalem.

    Tyre was the home of Hiram I, the father of the Tyrian king who helped to build Solomon’s temple. Hiram I was kin to David and sent skilled artisans to help David build a palace in Jerusalem, “the city of the Great King” (Matt. 5:35). Hiram is also known as "Huram" and "Horam", variations of the names Hur, Hor and Harun (Aaron). According to Midrash, Hur was Moses’ brother-in-law. Hur’s grandson was one of the builders of the Tabernacle.

    In other words, the common ancestors of Hiram I and David were Horites who anticipated the fulfillment of Genesis 3:15. They believed that the promised Seed of the Woman (the Son of God) would be born of their blood lines and they expected Him to visit them. Mark 7:24 gives an account of when the Son of God visited Tyre, and here we are told that Jesus “could not pass unrecognized.”


    Caste-based Industries of Bethlehem

    Beside keeping sheep and priestly duties, another occupation in ancient Bethlehem was leather work. Leather workers were called Tahash. One of Nahor's sons was Tahash (Gen. 22:24). Tahash refers to a tanner of animal skins. Exodus 25:5 links "five ram skins dyed red" with "tahash skins" and "acacia wood." The Tahash appear to be those who ritually prepared the skins of sacrificed animals for use in solemn oath, such as the passing of leather sandals.

    Now in earlier times in Israel, for the redemption and transfer of property to become final, one party took off his sandal and gave it to the other. This was the method of legalizing transactions in Israel. (Ruth 4:7)

    The exchange of the leather sandal was a blood oath since it involved taking the life of an animal The practice was to confirm the exchange property after a death. Aben Ezra says that the giving of the leather shoe was "to confirm all things" whether by sale or barter.

    The exchange of a leather shoe represents a solemn oath like that signaled by the exchange of a linen cloth, called "sudar." According to the Medieval rabbi Rashi, a linen cloth was used to make purchases and the cloth was called "sudar." 

    Rashi is speaking of a related custom. The term "sudar" pertains to "Sudra" which is a reference to the peoples of Sudan. Linen originated in the Nile Valley and was carried from there to India. Among Abraham's Nilo-Saharan ancestors wounds were treated with raw meat and bandaged with linen. Dead domesticated animals, such as dogs and donkeys, were wrapped in white linen and buried outside the towns.

    In Genesis 3:21, God acts as the first tahash when He sacrifices animals to make coverings for the man and the woman. In doing so, God covers them by a blood oath, wraps the newly dead, and sends them out of the Garden.

    Sudar is also a reference to the Dravidians. Dravidian leather workers are called "Madigas" and they are recognized as one of the world's oldest castes. The Madiga have nucleotide diversity levels as high as those of HapMap African populations. The Tahash and Madigas represent a very ancient practice of leather work associated with animal sacrifice and solemn oaths.

    The Tahash were also known as "sarki" in Africa and parts of Asia. The sarki sacrificed animals and tanned the hides. Today Sarki live in the Orissa province of India and in Orisha, Nigeria. They also live in the Tarai region of Nepal. Sometimes they are called “Harwa” which is the ancient Egyptian word for priest.


    Archaeology of Bethlehem

    Speaking about the discovery of a clay seal dating to the First Temple period, Eli Shukron of the Israel Antiquities Authority said, "This is the first time the name Bethlehem appears outside the Bible, in an inscription from the First Temple period (1006-586 B.C.), which proves that Bethlehem was indeed a city in the Kingdom of Judah, and possibly also in earlier periods."

    2700 year seal bears the name of Bethlehem

    The coin-sized artifact was found during archaeological excavations in the oldest part of Jerusalem. The seal (called a "bulla") bears the name of the city of Bethlehem in ancient Hebrew script. A bulla is a piece of clay used as an official seal on a document or object. The seal was impressed with the mark of the sender, and an intact bulla was proof that a document had been delivered unopened.

    The seal indicates that a shipment was sent from Bethlehem to Jerusalem in the seventh year of a king's reign. Possibly the king was Hezekiah or Josiah.

    The bulla makes it clear that a town called Bethlehem was inhabited by Hebrews in the time of Solomon's temple, but it doesn't specify which Bethlehem. There are two; one in Judah near Jerusalem, and the other in Galilee near Nazareth. Today there is growing consensus that Jesus' birthplace was the Bethlehem near Nazareth because the Bethlehem near Jerusalem was not inhabited during the first century when Jesus would have been born.

    When the Magi appeared before Herod they were told that the Messiah was to be born in Bethlehem. Herod’s wise men found this in the book of Micah: "But thou, Bethlehem Ephratah, though thou be little among the thousands of Judah, yet out of thee shall he come forth unto me that is to be ruler in Israel; whose goings forth have been from of old, from everlasting." This indicates two things about Jesus's birthplace: it belongs to the tribe of Judah and it was also associated with Caleb's wife Ephrath. There is no contradiction here, as Bethlehem belonged to Caleb, whose son was Salma. Salma is called the father of Bethlehem in Chronicles 2:54.

    Bethlehem is mentioned in Matthew 2:16-18 as the place where Herod ordered all the baby boys to be slaughtered, and Jesus would have been among "the Innocents" had Joseph not been warned by an angel to take the child and his mother and flee to Egypt. From Bethlehem in Galilee and nearby Nazareth the road to Egypt was a direct one.  From Bethlehem on the West bank there was no direct route into Egypt.

    As Jews traced their blood lines through their mothers, it was necessary for Joseph to register both he and Mary in Bethlehem. So they left Nazareth and went to Bethlehem, a distance of about 5.5 miles (9 kilometers). The distance from Nazareth to Bethlehem near Jerusalem is 93 miles (150 kilometers). Would Joseph have taken Mary, in the last stage of pregnancy, on a journey of 93 miles on a donkey?

    Mary’s full name was "Miriam Daughter of Joachim Son of Pntjr (Panther) Priest of Nathan of Bethlehem." Long before the time of the Pharaohs the Horites designated the king ntjr. The name p-ntjr means "God is King."

    Nathan is the name of the prophet who called King David to repentance and saved his kingdom. Likely this Nathan was one of David's kinsmen from Bethlehem in Galilee.


    Bethlehem of the West Bank

    The Church of the Nativity in the Bethlehem near Jerusalem was commissioned in 327 AD by Constantine and his mother Helena and was built over the site that was believed to be the cave where Jesus was born. There are caves under the church and one was used by St. Jerome for about 30 years. This is where he translated the Bible into Latin (Vulgate). Some of the caves were used for burial.

    Such a cave tomb was discovered in "Bethlehem South" in 2009.  It contained burial items such as pottery, plates and beads, along with the remains of two individuals. The tomb dates to the Middle Bronze period (2200-1550 BC) when there was no permanent settlement in that place. Many tombs from this period have been found throughout Israel. In fact, this period is primarily known from the study of its cemeteries, with relatively few settlements discovered in the region of Judah.

    A 3100 year arrowhead found near Bethlehem South bears the inscription bn 'nt, meaning "son of Anat." In ancient Egyptian mythology, Anat and Ashtart were daughters of the Creator Ra. They became the wives of Set/Seth, the deified ruler on earth.



    The Priests of Nazareth

    $
    0
    0

    Alice C. Linsley


    Jesus grew up in Nazareth in Galilee. He was brought here as a child from Egypt. Nazareth is on an ancient trade route that goes north from Egypt through Galilee. In Roman times it was called the "Via Maris" but the route was traveled for many centuries before the Roman presence in Palestine. Another ancient road went from Nazareth to Jerusalem and it was along this road that the priests of Nazareth traveled to the temple to perform their sacred duties when it was their appointed time of service.




    In Nazareth, Jesus preached his first recorded sermon (Luke 4:16). He read Isaiah 61:1-3, a Messianic prophesy, and then declared, "Today this Scripture is fulfilled in your hearing." His hearers understood that he claimed to be the fulfillment of the prophesy and this aroused their anger. Because of their unbelief "He did not many mighty works there" (Matthew 13:58).

    When Nathaniel was told that the Messiah was from Nazareth, he wondered, "Can any good thing come out of Nazareth?" (John 1:46)  From Nathaniel's perspective, there was nothing remarkable about this town in the heart of an agricultural area in Galilee.


    Jesus' closest followers were from Galilee, and it was to Galilee that He returned and met with His disciples after His resurrection. At the Last Supper, He informed his disciples: "After I have been raised, I will go before you to Galilee.” (Matt. 26:32)

    In 1962 excavators discovered a small 3-4th century marble fragment with a list of the twenty-four priestly divisions in the ruins of a Caesarea synagogue. This list names the places where four of the divisions resided, including Nazareth. Until the discovery of this fragment, there was no extra-biblical record of Nazareth's existence before the sixth century A.D and no identification of a priestly division at that town.

    There were twenty-four priestly divisions after the construction of the Second Temple. Nineteen of these divisions are listed in Nehemiah 12:10-22. In the Nehemiah list we find these names of particular interest: Joachim, Joseph, and Mattenai (also spelled Mattai/Mattan/Matthew). These are the names of priests who married the daughters of priests and from these lines came John the Baptist, Joseph, Mary and Jesus, the Incarnate Son of God. This was the line of Joseph of Hari-mathea, a voting member of the Sanhedrin. He and Nicodemus, another member of the Sanhedrin, buried Jesus’ body in a cave tomb similar to those used by their Horite ancestors in Bethlehem and Hebron. Joseph and Nicodemus experienced first-hand Jesus' death. They buried him and sealed the tomb. They believed that He rose from the grave, and at great personal risk, they testified to His resurrection.

    Writing in the third century, Hippolytus records that Mary’s mother was a daughter of a priest named Matthan. Mary's father was the Horite shepherd-priest Yaochim (Joachim). Therefore, Mary was of the Horite ruler-priest lines that can be traed back to Abraham's Nilo-Saharan ancestors. Even those who hated Mary acknowledged her ruler status, as it is written in the Talmud: “She who was the descendant of princes and governors played the harlot with carpenters.” (Sanhedrin 106a)

    According to 1 Chronicles 24:15, Nazareth was the home of the eighteenth priestly division, hapiTSETS (Happizzez). The name is related to the ancient Egyptian word for the life-sustaining Nile which was called Hapi. Again we have evidence that Jesus of Nazareth was of the Horite ruler-priest lines that can be traced back to the Nile Valley.


    Related reading:  Which Bethlehem is Jesus' Birthplace?Who Were the Horites?; Jesus' Horite Ancestry; The Genesis Record of Horite Rule; Mary's Ruler-Priest Lineage


    Who is Jesus?

    $
    0
    0

    “One word of truth shall outweigh the whole world.”--Alexander Solzhenitsyn 

    "I have brought you glory on earth by completing the work you gave me to do."--Jesus Christ


    Alice C. Linsley


    Jesus Christ has been made so "meek and mild" that His eternal nature and divine power are hardly apparent. Is it any wonder that many find him little more than an interesting historical figure?

    Study of Jesus' Horite ancestry and the Horite marriage and ascendancy pattern verifies certain historical facts about Jesus of Nazareth. First, he was born of the priest lines that can be traced back to Abraham's Nilo-Saharan ancestors.  Second, his priest caste were known to be shepherds, and third, he was of royal blood going back to Eden. Jesus' royal blood is traced through the Horite kings of Tyre. God told Ezekiel to "raise a lament over the king of Tyre and say to him: Thus says the Lord God: You were the seal of perfection, full of wisdom and flawless beauty. You were in Eden, in the Garden of God; every precious stone was your adornment... and gold beautifully wrought for you, mined for you, prepared the day you were created." (Ezekiel 28:11-18)

    When we describe Jesus as the "Good Shepherd" or "our Great High Priest" or "the King of Kings" we are not speaking figuratively. He was indeed all of these.


    The Seed of the Woman

    Jesus is the "Seed" of Genesis 3:15. This first promise of the Bible foretells how the Seed of the Woman will trample the serpent under foot. This is a reference to the defeat of death and the restoration of Paradise. The serpent often symbolized the worm of death. The Apocalypse of St. John (Revelation) identifies the dragon as "that ancient serpent called the devil, or Satan, who leads the whole world astray" (Rev. 12:9, 20:2). In John's vision the serpent is associated with the serpent of Eden.

    In the resurrection, Jesus Christ trampled down death by death and bestowed life on those in the tombs, as recited in the ancient Liturgy. Jesus is the Seed of the Woman, the long-expected Immortal Mortal, the Sent-Away Son who defeats the serpent, subdues all God's enemies, and establishes an eternal kingdom. Jesus' mission involves all these tasks and more.

    This Messianic hope started small and grew over many centuries among Jesus' Horite ancestors. It is based upon the promise that a Woman of the Horite lines would bring forth the "Seed" who would crush the serpent's head and restore Paradise (Gen. 3:15). Jesus identified himself as that Seed in John 12:24. He tells his disciples that he is going to Jerusalem to die and when they object, he explains: "Truly, truly, I say to you, unless a grain of wheat falls into the earth and dies, it remains alone; but if it dies, it bears much fruit." The purpose of a seed is to die and be buried in the ground. Unless this happens, it cannot bring forth life.  Here the ordinary expresses something most extraordinary!

    The Seed of Genesis 3:15 was to die and rise again in order to defeat the worm/serpent, and to give life to the world. As C.S. Lewis noted, even the pagans of Europe and the Hindus of India had dreams of the god who dies and rises again. This idea appears in their sacred writings. In Mere Christianity, Lewis writes that God "sent the human race what I call good dreams: I mean ... about a god who dies and comes to life again and, by his death, has somehow given new life to men." As Stephen Freeman has written, "Jesus did not come to make bad men good, but to make dead men live."




    The Ancient of Days

    The Ancient of Days in Aramaic is Atik Yomin and it appears in the book of Daniel.

    "I beheld till the thrones were cast down, and the Ancient of Days did sit, whose garment was white as snow, and the hair of his head like the pure wool: his throne was like the fiery flame, and his wheels as burning fire." (Daniel 7:9)

    Variations include the Ancient of Ancients and the Ancient Man. Consider these references:

    "Whenever Judgment looms and the forehead of the Impatient One is revealed, the Forehead of the Ancient of Ancients is revealed; Judgment subsides and is not executed." (Idra Rabba, Zohar 3:136b)

    "The Ancient Man danced on the serpent, who still spewed poison from his eyes and hissed loudly in his anger, and he trampled down with his feet whatever head the serpent raised, subduing him calmly as if he were being worshipped with flowers. Kaliya, his umbrella of hoods shattered by the gay dance of death, his limbs broken, vomiting blood copiously from his mouths, remembered the Guru of all who move and are still, the Ancient Man, Narayana, and he surrendered to him in his heart." (Srimad Bhagavatam 10:6, from Andrew Wilson, Ed. World Scriptures, p. 449)  This is a reference to "Hari Krishna" or Ruler-priest Christ

    The Bhagavata Purana is a sacred text of Hinduism. It draws on ancient oral sources but was not inscribed until around 500 A.D, about 1000 years after the book of Daniel.

    The oldest of all these references is found in Daniel 7 and continues with this description of the Christ coming to the Ancient of Days.

    13 “I saw in the night visions,
    and behold, with the clouds of heaven
    there came one like a son of man,
    and he came to the Ancient of Days
    and was presented before him.

    14 And to him was given dominion
    and glory and a kingdom,
    that all peoples, nations, and languages
    should serve him;
    his dominion is an everlasting dominion,
    which shall not pass away,
    and his kingdom one
    that shall not be destroyed.

    Daniel 7:14 parallels Psalm 145:13: "Your kingdom is an everlasting kingdom, and your dominion endures through all generations."


    He who Subdues God's Enemies

    Jesus Christ is the mighty warrior of God and he will be victorious over all the enemies of God. Psalm 110, recognized as a reference to the Messiah, says: The Lord says to my Lord: “Sit at My right hand until I make Your enemies a footstool for Your feet.”

    Messianic passages such as this have parallels in ancient Horite texts. Remember that Abraham and his ancestors were Horites who expected a woman of their ruler-priest lines to bring forth the Seed. The Horites were devotees of Horus, Son of Ra. Consider how Horus, the archetype of Christ, describes himself in the Coffin texts (passage 148): 

    I am Horus, the great Falcon upon the ramparts of the house of him of the hidden name. My flight has reached the horizon. I have passed by the gods of Nut. I have gone further than the gods of old. Even the most ancient bird could not equal my very first flight. I have removed my place beyond the powers of Set, the foe of my father Osiris. No other god could do what I have done. I have brought the ways of eternity to the twilight of the morning. I am unique in my flight. My wrath will be turned against the enemy of my father Osiris and I will put him beneath my feet in my name of ‘Red Cloak’. (Myth and Symbol in Ancient Egypt by R.T. Rundle Clark, p. 216)

    Job 39:27-30 presents another image of the one who devours enemies and feeds her young with bloody bits of flesh from the carcasses of the fallen. Does the vulture (nesher) mount up at thy command, and make her nest on high? She dwells and abides on the rock, upon the crag of the rock, and the strong place. From there she seeks the prey, and her eyes behold afar off. Her young ones also suck-up blood: and where the slain are, there is she.

    In Exodus 19:4, we read: Ye have seen what I did to the Egyptians, and, how I bare you on vulture's (nesherim) wings, and brought you unto myself.

    The Hebrews (Habiru) grasped the force of this metaphor since the vulture was an emblem of power and protection in ancient Egypt. Images of the vulture mother of Nekhbet of Elkab are shown with outspread wings on Egyptian monuments and temples. Jesus looking at the Holy City said, "Jerusalem, Jerusalem, you who kill the prophets and stone those sent to you, how often I have longed to gather your children together, as a hen gathers her chicks under her wings, and you were not willing." (Matt.  23:37)

    The vulture represented Hathor-Meri's devoted care of Horus, the son of Ra. Horus is the pattern by which some of Abraham's Jewish descendants recognized Jesus as the promised Son of God. Jesus subdues the enemies of God in order that God's children might live and prosper. This is expressed in Psalm 2:12: "Kiss the Son, lest he be angry and you be destroyed in your way, for his wrath can flare up in a moment. Blessed are all who take refuge in him."


    The Lamb/Ram of God

    Horus of the two horizons (east-west) and Horus of the two crowns (north-south) are examples of how meaning is derived by holding 2 points in view. We see this in the Passover sacrifice at twilight, what is called in Hebrew ben ha-'arbayim, meaning "between the two settings." Rabbinic sources take this to mean "from noon on." According to Radak, the first "setting" occurs when the sun passes its zenith at noon and the shadows begin to lengthen, and the second "setting" is the actual sunset (p. 55, vol. 2, The Jewish Publication Society Torah Commentary, "Exodus").

    In the Horite tradition, Horus rises with the sun as the lamb on the eastern horizon. After his sacrifice at the sacred center (high noon), he grows to full strength as the ram on the western horizon. Now we understand the story of the binding of Isaac. As they ascended Mount Moriah, Isaac asked his father "where is the lamb" for the sacrifice? Abraham replied that God would provide the lamb, but God did not provide a lamb. God provided a ram. The ram caught in the thicket proved that Abraham's act of faith had been acknowledged by God. It appears that Abraham believed Isaac to be the Seed of the Woman (Gen. 3:15). Isaac did meet several of the expected conditions, but God would supply his own Lamb who passed from weakness (kenosis) to fullness of power (resurrection). Jesus is symbolized here. He is the Lamb of God who comes to full strength as the Ram of God.

    Horus was called the Lamb in his weaker (kenotic) existence and he was called the Ram in his glorified strength. Both are associated with the death and resurrection symbolism of the vernal equinox. This sheds light on the story of Abraham's offering of his son. James 2:21 says, "Was not Abraham our father justified by works, when he had offered Isaac his son upon the altar? Seest thou how faith wrought with his works, and by works was faith made perfect?"

    When John pointed to Jesus and called Him the "Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world", he identified Him as the fulfillment of the first promise. John writes: "Who is it that overcomes the world? Only he who believes that Jesus is the Son of God." (I John 5:5) Who passes from fleshly weakness through death to divine strength? Only those who are in the Lamb who has become the Ram.

    To be in the strength of the Ram, that is the resurrected strength, one must believe that Jesus is the Son of God. Christianity is not an inclusive religion. There is no free pass to the eternal kingdom.


    The Fixer of Boundaries

    The wisdom of the Horites extended to medicine, astronomy, writing, commerce, navigation, natural sciences, and architecture. They were the inventors of the earliest known writing systems. They were the early scribes and wise men or prophets. Abraham's Nilo-Saharan ancestors were dedicated to observation of the planets and constellations. They observed that the planets and the constellations have an orderly clock-like movement. They conceived of this order as fixed and established by the generative force which makes existence possible (logos, nous, ruach, etc.)

    Horite wisdom was unrivaled in the ancient world and much of the wisdom ascribed to the ancient Greeks was borrowed from the Horites. Iamblichus wrote that Thales of Miletus insisted that Pythagoras go to Memphis to study because the priests there were esteemed for their knowledge and wisdom. Plato studied for 13 years in Egypt under the priest Sechnuphis and his conception of the eternal Forms was based on Horite metaphysics.

    In the works of Plato and Aristotle horos or horismos refers to landmarks, boundaries and categorical limits. The Greek word for boundaries in creation is oros or horos, a reference to the celestial archetype of Horus who who marked the cosmic boundaries and established the "kinds" (essences). He guarded the four directional points and controlled the waves/currents and the winds. This is illustrated in the account of Jesus calming the winds and the waves in Mark 4:35-41, Luke 8:22-25 and Matthew 8:23-27. The veteran fisherman are terrified and cry out to Jesus, saying, "Teacher, don't you care if we drown?" The Gospel of Mark then states that: He got up, rebuked the wind and said to the waves, "Quiet! Be still!" Then the wind died down and it was completely calm. He said to his disciples, "Why are you so afraid? Do you still have no faith?" They were terrified and asked each other, "Who is this? Even the wind and the waves obey him!"


    The Storm on the Sea of Galilee by Rembrandt, 1632

    The Harmattan trade wind that blows across the Sahara was named for Horus. The word is comprised of the biradicals HR for Horus and MT, meaning order. Horus was invoked to send favorable winds for sailing. The four winds appeared as birds at the four quarters of the heavens. On the walls of Amenemhat's burial chamber at Hawara Horus is depicted at the cardinal points and associated with the resurrection of the ruler. The canopic jars that hold the ruler's organs are topped with the four images of Horus.

    For Abraham's Horite ancestors, the Sun spoke to them of their deity, HR (Horus in Greek). He was regarded with his father Ra as the marker of boundaries. Horos (oros in Greek) refers to the boundaries of an area, or a landmark, or a term. From horos come the English words hour, horizon and horoscope. The association of Horus with the horizon is seen in the word Har-ma-khet, meaning Horus of the Horizon.

    Horus' mother was Hathor-Meri. She conceived miraculously by the overshadowing of the Sun and she is shown on Egyptian monuments holding her child in a manger. Horus is the archetype by which Abraham's descendants would recognize Jesus as the promised Seed of the Woman (Gen. 3:15). His authentication was His rising from the dead on the third day, in accordance with Horite expectation.

    In a 5 day ceremony, the Nilotic peoples fasted as a sign of grief for the death of Horus at the hand of his brother. On the third day the priests led processions to the fields where grain was sowed as a sign of Horus' rising to life. Jesus described his death as a seed of grain falling into he ground and dying (John 12:20-26). He foretold his rising on the third day. St. Augustine noted that the Egyptians took great care in the burial of their dead and never practiced cremation. Abraham's ancestors believed in the resurrection of the body and awaited a deified king who would rise from the grave and deliver his people from death to life eternal.


    Roles Reversed in the Song of Songs?

    $
    0
    0

    Alice C. Linsley


    The Song of Songs is assumed to be the story of a pale King Solomon and his Dark Lover. However the evidence of anthropology suggests that the descriptions, and thus the roles, should be reversed. Solomon was the "dark" one and his sister was "made white" (Song of Songs 8:5). It was the practice for queens to appear in public with a whitened complexion.

    Song of Songs 1:5: I am dark, but comely, O ye daughters of Jerusalem, as the tents of Kedar, as the curtains of Solomon.

    The term “dark” does not appear in verse 5, but scholars assume a parallelism between verses 5 and 6, so "I am dark" appears in verse 5. 

    Song of Songs 1:6: Look not upon me, because I am dark, because the sun hath looked upon me: my mother's sons were angry with me; they made me the keeper of the vineyards; but mine own vineyard have I not kept.


    The phrase "my mother's sons were angry with me" is a reference to the way the older brothers treated their younger brother. We see this in the story of Jacob being sold into slavery, and in the way that David was made to stay in the fields while his older brothers came to feast with their father and the prophet Samuel. David's skin tone was ruddy and he was said to be comely or handsome. This is the gist of verses 5 and 6.

    Solomon was a ruler of the Horite ruler-priest lines. His ancestors originated in the Nile Valley and had a reddish brown skin tone. The rulers appeared with a dark tan as evidence that they had been overshadowed by the sun, the emblem of the Creator. Divine appointment came by this means and was indicated by the initial Y, or solar cradle, in their names: Yishmael, Yitzak, Yacob, Yisbak, Yaqtan, etc. So it appears that scholars have reversed the roles in the Song of Songs.

    Some have argued that the sister has a dark tan, reflecting her poverty or low social rank as one who has to labored in the sun. This interpretation fails in logic. As Solomon's sister, she would not have been a common laborer. She would be a royal daughter whose feet and hands show the benefits of ointments and beauty baths, as indicated in 7:1: "How beautiful are thy feet in sandals, O prince's daughter!" It may be that this is a reference Solomon's wife who was a daughter of Pharaoh (1 Kings 3:1).

    It is sometimes argued that the royal designation should not be taken literally because in Syrian love songs (wasfs) the bride and groom are called "king" and "queen." However this is a later custom which exists today in Eastern Orthodox ceremonies in the which the bride and groom are crowned. Given the fixed nature of the marriage and ascendancy pattern among the Horites it is far more likely that the sister bride is Solomon's half-sister. This is consistent with the practice of his Horite forefathers (Horim). Sarah was Abraham's half-sister, and Jochebed was Amram's half-sister.

    The Horite rulers had a distinctive marriage and ascendancy pattern involving two wives. The first wife was a half-sister and taken at a relatively young age. The sexual frolics of the Song of Songs suggest a youthful coupling. The second wife was a patrilineal cousin taken shortly before the ruler ascended to the throne at around the age of 50. This more mature sex is not suggested.


    Dark kings and pale queens

    As Solomon royal sister, his bride would appear in public with a whitened complexion. Her paleness is the binary opposite of Solomon's darkness. The Horite ruler spent a great deal of time in the sun practicing martial arts, hunting, and boating.  He was expected to be darkened by the sun while his queen, whose rank was associated with the moon, was expected to be pale. The association of nobility with stars and planets was common in the ancient Afro-Asiatic world.


    Egyptian princess and her lover
    Note her paleness and his reddish-brown skin tone.

    In 8:5 the ruler's sister bride is described as having been "made white" while her beloved has skin as dark "as the tents of Kedar." Kedar was a son of Ishmael by his Egyptian wife (Gen. 25:13). The Hebrew that appears here means darker than his queen because he exposed himself to the sun.


    It is generally assumed that the color of the Kedar tents was black, but some were made of the wool of red Nubian goats. The Egyptians and the Horites of Edom (Gen. 36) to whom David was related, had a reddish skin tone. The Greeks called the people of Petra, a Horite shrine city, Idumea which means "red people."

    Inn the binary worldview of the Horite and Habiru (Hebrew) the sun and moon comprised a binary set. In the binary view one entity of the binary set is superior in some visible (empirical) way to the other entity. Genesis 1:16 expresses the binary view in these words: "God made the two great lights; the greater to rule the day and the lesser to rule the night."

    The sun represented masculine virtues because solar rays inseminate the earth over which the sun has dominion. The moon represented feminine virtues because it is the sun's companion and because it influences the woman's monthly cycle. This is why the male rulers of ancient Egypt appeared with darkened skin, but their queens appeared with whitened skin.

    The Song of Songs weaves together various love stories, and it is a challenge to pull the threads apart. Even doing so destroys the beauty of the whole. That said, the book should be read with greater attention to the anthropological details that prompt the reader to imagine Solomon as the dark lover and his half-sister as the pale lover. That way of reading brings forward some different meanings and is well worth exploring.


    Related reading: The Sun and Moon in Genesis; A Tent for the Sun; The Binary Worldview of the Horites; What Color Was Abraham?; Moses' Horite FamilyLevi-Strauss and Derrida on Binary Oppositions; Yael Cameron-Klangwisan's Treatise on the Song of Songs


    Viewing all 362 articles
    Browse latest View live