Quantcast
Channel: BIBLICAL ANTHROPOLOGY
Viewing all 357 articles
Browse latest View live

The Prehistoric Anatolians Lived Well

$
0
0



The prehistoric settlement of Çatalhöyük has fascinated researchers for decades. The site reveals a very sophisticated way of life. There were temples and the priests of Çatalhöyük wore leopard skins like the ancient Nilotic priests.




Excavations at Çatalhöyük reveal primary and secondary burial, obsidian blades, a clay stamp seal, and more than 2000 zoomorphic clay figurines. The majority are representations of cattle, sheep and goats. Copper beads found in 8,500-year-old graves at Catalhöyük were made by hammering native metal found in nature. 

The trapezoid shape appears to have been an important symbol among the peoples of this region. The pillars at Göbekli Tepe have a trapezoidal shape. Many of the pits at Blagotin in Serbia have entrances with the trapezoid shape. The architecture of the later Hittites included trapezoidal doors such as this entrance to the chamber of Suppiluliuma II in Hattusa.




In many houses at Catalhöyük the main room was decorated with plastered bull skulls (bucrania) set into the east or west walls. These reflect the religious sun symbolism of these archaic people and the same symbolism is found among the later Hittites of Anatolia also. The bull with the sun resting on its horns represented the overshadowing presence of the Creator, whose emblem was the Sun.

Analysis of the foods in ceramic vessels reveals that the people of Çatalhöyük put both milk and meat in the same container. They also herded and ate pigs. Clearly, they were not observing Kosher guidelines. Jewish dietary law (Kashrut) dates to the latter Neo-Babylonian Period (c.730-500 BC).

The dietary restrictions outlined in Deuteronomy and Leviticus are the work of the Deuteronomist Historian, a Neo-Babylonian source. In the Book of Daniel we find three Jewish men insisting on eating differently as a way to express their ethnic and religious identity. This is one of many ways Jews have to distinguish themselves from their non-Jewish neighbors. Archaeological excavations of Iron Age I sites in Israel have shown that pigs were entirely absent from the herd-based economy of the Israelites though they were a food source for all the other peoples of the region. According to Ronald Hendel, such culinary distinctions soon became codified markers of cultural identity, whereby “the Philistine treat became an Israelite taboo.”

The diet of the people of Catalhöyük appears to have been varied and relatively nutritious, according to a recent report (October 3, 2018) from the Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History:

An international team led by researchers from the Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, the Freie Universität Berlin and the University of York has uncovered details about the diet of early farmers in the central Anatolian settlement of Çatalhöyük. By analyzing proteins from residues in ancient pots and jars excavated from the site, the researchers were able to find evidence of foods that were eaten there. Although previous studies have looked at pot residues from the site, this was the first to use proteins, which can be used to identify plants and animals more specifically, sometimes down to the species level. 
Knowledge of the diet of people living in the prehistoric settlement of Çatalhöyük almost 8000 years ago has been completed in astonishing scope and detail by analyzing proteins from their ceramic bowls and jars. Using this new approach, an international team of researchers has determined that vessels from this early farming site in central Anatolia, in what is now Turkey, contained cereals, legumes, dairy products and meat, in some cases narrowing food items down to specific species.

Read more here.



INDEX of Topics at Biblical Anthropology

$
0
0

Learn to read the Bible through the lens of cultural anthropology and you will never read it the same way again. If you are new to this research, it would be helpful to begin with these articles:

Abraham
The Calling of Abraham
The Marriage and Ascendancy Pattern of Abraham's People
Abraham's Complaint
Abraham's Authority and Ancient Law Codes
Abraham, Descendant of Both Ham and Shem
Roads Connected Abraham's Territory
What Language Did Abraham Speak?
Who Was the Bigger Liar, Abraham or Isaac?
Were Abraham's Ancestors Rulers or Refugees?
Abraham and Job: Horite Rulers

Activities of Archaic Peoples
Threshing
Sheep Cotes
Swimming and Diving
The Northern Range of Archaic Humans
Some Marks of Prehistoric Religion
The Stone Age
The Age of the Earth and Evidence of Human Occupation

Adam
Blaming Origin Sin on Adam
The Historical Adam
Adam Was a Red Man
Adam and Eve: The Blood and the Birther
Elder Joseph on Adam and Eve

Africa
The Africa Chesterton Never Knew
The Shrine City of Nekhen
Why Nekhen is Anthropologically Significant
The Mega-Nile
Africa is Archaeologically Rich
Sudan is Archaeologically Rich

Afro-Arabians
Peleg: Time of Division
The Joktanite Tribes
The Jebusites Unveiled
Intermarriage Between the Dedanites and the Edomites

Afro-Asiatics
Interview with Christopher Ehret
Ethics and Religious Practices of the Afro-Asiatics
Afro-Asiatic Rulers and the Celestial Archetype
Nimrod, an Afro-Asiatic Kingdom Builder
Afro-Asiatic Kingdom Building
The Afro-Asiatic Dominion
The Spread of the Afro-Asiatic Worldview
Afro-Asiatic Symbols that Speak of God

Agriculture
Horticulture in the Ancient World
Olive Oil Production in the Ancient World
Threshing Floors and Solar Symbolism
32,000 Year Flour Processing Plant

Ainu/Annu
Solving the Ainu Mystery
The Annu of On (Iunu)
The Nile-Japan Ainu Connection
Abraham's Ainu Ancestors
Ainu at Genetic Center
A Kindling of Ancient Memory
The Bible and the Question of Race

Akkadian
Akkadian Lexicon

Amorites
The Amorites: Caste of Royal Scribes
The Amorites: Aryan Canaanites?
The Ar Clans

Anatolia
The Prehistoric Anatolians Lived Well
The Last Days of Hattusa
The Luwian: Another Theory
A New Hieroglyphic Inscription from Pancarlı Höyük
The Trapezoid in Ancient Architecture and Technology
ÇATALHÖYÜK 2005 ARCHIVE: Çatalhöyük Research Project

Ancestor Veneration
Teraphim: Idols or Ancestor Figurines?
The Nephilim: Angels or Ancestors
The Bosom of Abraham
Recovering the African Background of Genesis

Animals in the Bible
Celestial Horses
The Animals on Noah's Ark
The Rooster in Biblical Symbolism
Ram Symbolism of the Ancient World
The Red Heifer
The Ostrich in Biblical Symbolism
Did Abraham's People Have "Easter" Eggs?
The Fatted Calf
Why Cows Were Sacred in the Ancient World
Elephants in the Time of Abraham
Abraham's Camels
Dogs in the Bible
Noah's Birds
The Lion and Judah
Jesus: From Lamb to Ram
Animal Totems Used to Trace Ancestry
Goats: In Memory of Ellen and Gordon Hatcher

Anthropology
Why Nekhen is Anthropologically Significant
Genesis Through the Lens of Anthropology
Anthropological Evidence for the Exodus

Apocalyptic Literature
The Seventh Seal and Silence in Heaven
The Seven Bowls of Revelation 16
Number Symbolism in Revelation
The Dragon and the Beast of Revelation
Revelation 12: The Woman, The Child, and the Dragon
The Signs of Revelation 12
Christ's Message to the Seven Churches

Aaron
The Aaronic Blessing Speaks of the Gospel
Moses' Wives and Brothers

Architecture
The Ancient Tumuli of Nobles
The Pillars of Solomon's Temple
Sun Cities of the Ancient World
Prehistoric Obelisk Found in Judah
Circumcision and Circles of Standing Stones in the Judean Hills
Horite Temples
The High Places
The Shrine City of Nekhen
77,000-Year Settlement in Sudan
Europe's Oldest Prehistoric Town Unearthed in Bulgaria
The Trapezoid in Ancient Architecture
Sheep Cotes

Ark of the Covenant
The Ark Rested in Bethlehem
Was the Pattern of the Ark Original?

Ascendancy Patterns

Astronomy
The Religion of the Archaic Rulers
The Celestial Dance Observed by the Magi
Who Were the Wise Men?
The Sun and the Moon in Genesis
Ancient African Astronomers
Reality is Cross Shaped

Axial Age
Understanding the Axial Age

Bethlehem
Which Bethlehem was Jesus' Birthplace?
The Ark Rested in Bethlehem
Bethlehem in the Time of Abraham
Who Were the Wise Men?
Horite Expectation and the Star of Bethlehem
Middle Bronze Age Tomb Found in Bethlehem

Biblical Anthropology
Dismantling Outdated Interpretations
Biblical Anthropology is the Work of Christians
What is Biblical Anthropology?
An Introduction to Cultural Anthropology
Support Biblical Anthropology Research
Biblical Anthropology, the Science, Not Speculative Theology
Talking on Facebook about Biblical Anthropology
Biblical Anthropology and the Question of Common Ancestry
Biblical Anthropology is Science
Is Biblical Anthropology an Oxymoron?
Biblical Anthropologists Discuss Darwin
The Bible and Anthropological Investigation
What Does a Biblical Anthropologist Do?
Biblical Anthropology and Antecedents
Derrida and Biblical Anthropology
Charles Kraft on Why Few Christians Are Cultural Anthropologists
Dean Arnold on Christian Anthropologists

Biblical Names
Royal Names in Genesis
The Nubian Context of YHWH
An African Reflects on Biblical Names
African Naming Practices
Is Enoch a Royal Title
Conversation about Hausa Origins
Conversation about Igbo Origins

Biblical Worldview
The Biblical Worldview
Science and Miracles
The Sacred Center in Biblical Theology

Binary Distinctions
Binary Sets and the Binary Worldview
Does the Binary Feature Signal Greater Complexity?
The Binary Aspect of the Biblical Worldview
The Importance of Binary Distinctions
Binary Sets in the Ancient World
Circumcision and Binary Distinctions
Blood and Binary Distinctions

Blood Symbolism
Comparing Cosmologies to Trace Origins
Blood and Crosses
Water and Blood
Mining Blood
The Blood of Jesus
The Pleromic Blood and Gender Distinctions
Blood and Binary Distinctions

Bread
Threshing Floors and Solar Symbols

Burial Practices
Red Ocher People
Kushite Burial Practices
The Graves of Gebel el Silsila
The Ancient Tumuli of Nobles
Burial Practices of the Rulers of Old
Stone Work of the Ancient World
The Priesthood in England - Part 3

Cain
Who Did Cain Marry?
Cain as Ruler
The Mark of Cain

Calendars
Does the Gezer Calendar Reflect Nilotic Farming Practices?

Canaanite
The Canaanite Y and the Phaistos Disk
The Urheimat of the Canaanite Y
The Peoples of Canaan
Who Were the Canaanites?

Castes
Evidence of Castes in the Book of Ruth
The Origin of Castes
Religion of the Archaic Rulers

Christ in Biblical Anthropology
The Giving God
The Eternal Son Comes Down From Heaven
The Christ as Alpha and the Omega
The Risen Christ in Genesis

Circumcision
Circumcision and Standing Stones in the Judean Hills
Why Zipporah Circumcised Her Son
The Origin of Circumcision
Circumcision and Binary Distinctions
A Bridegroom of Blood

Cities
Twin Cities of the Ancient World
Sun Cities of the Ancient World
The High Places
The Shrine City of Nekhen

Climate
When the Sahara was Wet
Genesis and Climate Change
Water Systems Connected Nile and Central Africa
Climate Cycles and Noah's Flood
The Jordan River in Abraham's Time
Kansas Science Bill Faces Defeat
Rick Pott's Variability Hypothesis has Biblical support
Antarctica Once Had Baobab Trees

Cosmology
Comparing Cosmologies to Trace Origins
The Cosmology of Abraham's People
Biblical Cosmology and Ethics
A Flat Earth and the Biblical Evidence
The Pillars of the Earth

Creationism
The Age of the Earth and the Evidence of Human Occupation
Conversation on Creationism About False Choices
Evidence of an Old Earth - Part 1
Evidence of an Old Earth - Part 2

Crucifixion
Hanged on a Tree

David
David's Bloodline
David's Royal City
The Ethnicity of Abraham and David
David's Zion Found

Death
Gathered to His people
The Bosom of Abraham
Sheol and the Second Death
The Question of Immortality
Righteous Rulers and the Resurrection

Deborah
The Judges Samuel, Deborah and Huldah
Deborah the Warrior Bee
The Precedent for Women Rulers in Ancient Egypt

Dedanites
Intermarriage Between the Dedanites and the Edomites
The Afro-Arabian Dedanites
Who Were the Dedanites?

Derrida, Jacques
Derrida and Biblical Anthropology
Levi-Strauss and Derrida on Binary Oppositions

Deuteronomist
How the Deuteronomist Changes the Genesis Narrative
Afro-Asiatic Influences on the Deuteronomist Historian
Fundamentalism and Syncretism in Hebrew History
The Reconceptualization of Kingship in Deuteronomy

DNA Studies
Haplogroups of Interest to Biblical Anthropologists
Haplogroup R1b (Y-DNA)
Tut's Father Married His Cousin
Ethiopian DNA Study Ignores Significant Data
Ashkenazi Represent Judeo-Khazar Admixture
A Kindling of Ancient Memory
Abraham: Descendant of Both Shem and Ham
Migrations Out of Africa
Denisovan Populations
Denisovan Finds Create a Stir
Genetic Risks in Cousin Marriage
Genetic Adam Never Knew Genetic Eve
DNA Research Confirms Kushite Migration
DNA Confirms Mixed Ancestry of Jews
Mitochondrial Eve
Genesis and Genetics
Sub-Saharan DNA of Modern Jews
DNA Research Confirms Kushite Migration
Overview of Human Origins
A Flawed Paradigm
Is Scientific Dating of Fossils Reliable?
Genesis on Human Origins
The Making of Man
Genesis: Is It Really About Human Origins?
Q and A on Creation vs Evolution
Genesis and Genetics
Hunter-Gatherer Study Inconclusive
Ethiopian DNA Study Ignores Significant Data
A Kindling of Ancient Memory
Abraham: Descendant of Both Shem and Ham
Migrations Out of Africa
80,000 Year African Ancestor of Chinese Men

Earth Science
Walking Rocks
Pillars of the Earth
Geologic Studies Confirm Biblical Data

Eber
Who Was Eber?
Noah's Sons and Their Descendants

Ecclesiasticus (Wisdom of Ben Sirach)
The Chiastic Center of Ecclesiasticus
The Wisdom of Jesus Ben Sirach

Edom
The Antiquity of the Edomite Rulers
Edom and Copper
Edo, Edom, Idumea
Edom and the Horites
The Edomites and the Color Red
Ancient Seats of Wisdom
Two Named Esau
Petra Reflects Horite Beliefs

Egypt
Ancient Egyptian Lexicon
Etymology of the Vav
Egypt in the Christmas Narrative
Exploring Hosea 11:1 - "Out of Egypt"
The Sudanese Origins of Pharaonic Egypt
Egypt in the Book of Genesis
Ancient Egyptians Were Seafaring
Medical Care in Ancient Egypt
The World's Oldest Book Found in Egypt

Ethnicity
The Ethnicity of David and Abraham
Who Were the Kushites?
Ashkenazi Represent Judeo-Khazar Admixture
Were the Natufians Kushites?
The Bible and the Question of Race
Who Were the Horites?
What Color Was Abraham?
Abraham and the Mahra/Masek

Eve in the Bible
The Biblical Meaning of Eve
Eve's Sin

Exodus
Anthropological Evidence for the Exodus
Number Symbolism in the Bible

Ezekiel
Ezekiel's New Temple

Fertility/ Fertility Images
Fertility Images Among Abraham's People
Sacred Mountains and Pillars
Peaks and Valleys in Biblical Symbolism

Food
Food Prohibitions and Religious Belief
Horticulture in the Ancient World
Olive Oil Production in the Ancient World
Nubian Beer
Wine Use in Antiquity
Why Cows Were Sacred in the Ancient World

Galilee
The Significance of Galilee in Matthew's Gospel

Genesis (Book)
Genesis in Anthropological Perspective
Index of Topics on Genesis
The African Cultural Context of Genesis 1-12
Christ's Resurrection in Genesis

Gezer
The Gezer Calendar
Circumcision and Standing Stones in the Judean Hills
The Peoples of Canaan

Hebrews (Book)
Paul to Hebrew Christians: Hold Fast the Faith of Your Horim
Paul to Hebrew Christians: Persevere in Hope
Hebrews 10: Christ's All Sufficient Sacrifice

High Places (Tamana/Ophel/Oppidum/Kar/Car)
The High Places
Karampetsos, Karambet, Karoutes
Kushite Shrines

Hittites
The Hittites of Anatolia
Abraham and the Hittites
The Last Days of Hattusa

Horites
Who Were the Horites?
Horite Temples
Was King Arthur a Horite Ruler?
The Nubian Context of YHWH
Totems and Tracing the Horites in History
Jesus' Horite Lineage
Samuel's Horite Family
The Men Who Spied on Canaan
Meroe on the Orontes

Hosea
Exploring Hosea 11:1 - "Out of Egypt"

Hungarian (Magyar)
Hungarian Lexicon

Human Origins
Fully Human From the Beginning
Overview of Human Origins
A Scientific Timeline of Genesis
Genesis and Genetics
Q and A on Creation and Evolution
Is Genesis Really About Human Origins?
Getting the facts About Human Origins

Idols/Idolatry
Graven Images and Idols
Fundamentalism and Syncretism in Hebrew History
Teraphim: Idols or Ancestral Figurines?

Jebusites
The Jebusites Unveiled
Jerusalem Under the Jebusites
The Jebu, Sheba, Joktan Confederation
The Priestly Order of Melchizedek

Jethro
Who Was Jethro?
A Bridegroom of Blood

Jesus
Jesus' Horite Lineage
Who is Jesus?
Mother and Son Pierced

Jerusalem
The Jerusalem that David Knew
Jerusalem Under the Jebusites
Jerusalem Pilgrimage

Jews
Ashkenazi Represent Judeo-Khazar Admixture
Sub-Saharan DNA of Modern Jews

Job
Abraham and Job: Horite Rulers
Righteous Job and His Kin
Job's Friends and Their Contribution to the Message of Job

Joshua
The Men Who Spied on Canaan

Judah
The Lion and Judah

Judaica
Are Rabbinic Interpretations of the Bible Accurate?
Did Jews Live in Dynastic Egypt?
Challenge to Shaye Cohen's Portrayal of Abraham as the First Jew
Member of Israel's Parliament Destroys Bible
Rabbi Hirsch on the Nations
The Talmud on the Virgin Mary
Talmudic Legend vs Biblical History

Judges
The Scatter-Gather Motif in Judges

Hazor
Hazor's Destruction: Another Theory

Hebrew
The Social Structure of the Biblical Hebrew (Part 1 - Introduction)
The Social Structure of the Biblical Hebrew (Part 2 - Descent)
The Social Structure of the Biblical Hebrew (Part 3 - Inheritance)
The Social Structure of the Biblical Hebrew (Part 4 - Right to Rule)
The Social Structure of the Biblical Hebrew (Part 5 - Residence)
The Social Structure of the Biblical Hebrew (Part 6 - Governance)
Denying Marriage: A cunning royal strategy

Kinship Analysis
Lamech Segment Analysis
The Cousin Bride's Naming Prerogative
The Pattern of Two Wives
The Marriage and Ascendancy Pattern of Abraham's People
Denying Marriage: A cunning royal strategy
Analysis of the Genesis 4 and 5 King Lists
The Lines of Ham and Shem Intermarried
Kain and Seth Married the Daughters of Nok
Methuselah's Wife
Noah's Sons and Their Descendants
Abraham's First-Born Son
The Genesis King Lists
Joseph's Relationship to Mary

Kushites
Identifying King Tut's Father
Royal Prayers
The Kushite Marriage Pattern Drove Kushite Expansion

Levites
Who Were the Levites?

Mary (Theotokos)
Was the Virgin Mary a Dedicated Royal Woman?
The Theotokos and Weaving
The Virgin Mary's Ancestry
Mother and Son Pierced

Melchizedek
The Lineage of Melchizedek
The Order of Melchizedek
Who Laid the Foundations of Science?

Metal workers
Red and Black Smiths
Copper and Iron
Afro-Asiatic Metal Workers

Midian
The Priests of Midian
Who Was Jethro?

Migration
The Migration of Abraham's Ancestors
DNA Research Confirms Kushite Migration
Does Genesis 10 Describe the Ainu Dispersion?

Mining/Miners
Miners Venerated Hathor
V. Kassianidou and A. Bernard Knapp, Archaeometallurgy in the Mediterranean: The Social Context of Mining, Technology and Trade
Copper and Iron

Moses
Moses the Horite Hebrew Priest
Moses's Horite Family
Moses's Wives and Brothers
The Serpent of Moses's Staff
A Bridegroom of Blood
Mosaic Authorship?
Moses and Abraham: Different Origins of Israel?

Music
Lyre Music from 1400 BC

Mythology
The Christ in Nilotic Mythology
Eliade Was Right About Celestial Archetypes
The Mythological Core of Christianity
Tehut's Victory Over Tehom
Heaven or Heavens: Does It Matter?

Nahor
Are the Names Nahor and Nehesi Related?

Nazareth
The Priests of Nazareth
Jesus of Nazareth, Son of David
Jesus' Home in Nazareth?
The Nazareth-Egypt Connection

Neolithic Industries and Technologies
Wine Making
Seeds from Heaven
Afro-Asiatic Metal Workers
Ancient Miners Venerated Hathor
Stone Work of the Ancient World
Genesis and the Stone Age

Nilo-Saharans/Proto-Saharans
Menes the Law Giver
Boats and Cows of the Proto-Saharans
Was Noah Mesopotamian or Proto-Saharan?
Sudan is Archaeologically Rich
Nilo-Saharan and Saharo-Nubian Populations

Noah
As in the days of Noah
Noah's Homeland
Noah's Flood: Where and When?
Saving Noah
Was Earth Repopulated After Noah's Flood?
Noah's Descendants
Noah's Sons and Their Descendants
Noah's Birds
Noah's Dog
Forty Days and Forty Nights
Noah: The Hollywood Version
Was Noah Mesopotamian or Proto-Saharan?
How Big Was Noah's Flood?

Nubia/Nubians
The Nubian Moiety
Nubian Warriors
The Nubian Context of YHWH
The Land of Wawat
Nubian Captives
Nubians Brewed Beer with Tetracycline

Number Symbolism
The Symbolism of Numbers in the Bible
Number Symbolism in the BibleNumber Symbolism in Revelation
Three Sons and The Son
Is Gematria Helpful in Decoding the Genesis King Lists?

Order of Creation
Hierarchy in Creation
Genesis and Genetics
Plato and Intelligent Design

Original Sin/Inherited Guilt
Inherited Guilt of Infection of Death?
What Happened in the Garden?
Is "Good and Evil" a Biblical Merism?

Philistines
Facts and Theories About the Philistines

Priests
The Priesthood is About the Blood
Why Women Were Never Priests
Physician Priests of Antiquity
Religion of the Archaic Rulers
The Priesthood in England - Part 1
The Priesthood in England - Part 2
The Priesthood in England - Part 3
The Priesthood in England - Conclusion
Horite Priests and the Hapiru
Who Were the Hapiru?
Horite Territory
The Origins of the Priesthood
Abraham and Job: Horite Rulers
Shepherd Priests
The Horite Conception of the Priesthood
God as Male Priest
The Daughters of Priests
Shamans and Priests

Questions Asked
Questions Asked by Primitive Man
Questions High Schoolers Ask About Genesis
More Questions About Sex
Is the Enoch Mentioned in the Sumerian Text the Enoch of Genesis?

Resurrection
Deified Rulers and Resurrection
The Sting of Death
Resurrection as Mirrored Reality
Matthew's Testimony Concerning the Empty Tomb
What Abraham Discovered on Mount Moriah

Revelation (Book)
Christ's Message to the Seven Churches
Number Symbolism in Revelation
The Signs of Revelation 12
The Woman, the Child and the Dragon
The Dragon and the Beast
The Seven Bowls of Revelation 16
The Seventh Seal and Silence in Heaven

Rulers
Rulers of the Ancient World
Royal Treaties
Archaic and Ancient Symbols of Authority
The Genesis King Lists
Nimrod, Afro-Asiatic Kingdom Builder
The Mighty Men of Old

Sacrifice
The Continuing Debate of Child Sacrifice
Where Did Animal Sacrifice Originate?
Did Abraham Intend to Sacrifice Isaac?

Sacred Spaces
Sheep Cotes
Threshing Floors
Mount Mary and the Origins of Life
Sacred Mountains
Mount Moriah
Mount Meru
Reading the Magdala Stone

Saka
Was Constantine a Saka Ruler?

Samuel
Samuel's Horite Family

Seals (bullae)
3000 Year Temple Seal
Yahu Seals

Seth
The Ruler Seth
Seth's Father and Abraham's Mother

Sex
Thoughts on Sex
More Thoughts on Sex

Solar Symbolism
The Sun and the Sacred
The Brentford Shard: Chi Rho or Solar Symbol?
The Gourd in Biblical Symbolism
Threshing Floors and Solar Symbolism
Sun Symbolism and Blood Guilt
A Tent for the Sun
The Dung Beetle and Heavenly Lights
The Sun and Celestial Horses

Song of Songs
Roles Reversed in the Song of Songs?

Technologies
Who Laid the Foundations of Science
The Tool Makers of Kathu
58,000 Year South African Pigment and Glue Factory
500,000 Year Engraved Shell
Flour Processing 32,000 Years Ago
The Trapezoid in Ancient Architecture and Technology
Mining Blood
Paleolithic Industries at Jabal Harun (Aaron's Mountain)
Archaic Shell Technology

Tehom
Tehom: Tihama of the Hadramout and Aden
The Victory of Tehut over Tehom

Temples
The Pillars of Solomon's Temple
The Temple of the Winged Lions
Destruction of the Temple: Rabbinic Interpretations
Horite Temples
Orientations of Nilo-Saharan Monuments

Toponymy
Meroe on the Orontes

Totems
Totems and Tracing the Horites in History
Using Totems to Trace Ancestry and Marriage Ties
Totemism in the Old Testament
The Lion and Judah

Tradition
Received Tradition: Pushing back the veil of time
Religion of the Archaic Rulers

Trees
The Judean Palm
What Happened to the Cedars of Lebanon?
Trees as Boundary Markers
The Trees of Prophets
Trees of the Bible
The Tree of Life

Tribes and Clans
The Edomites and the Color Red
Edom and the Horites
Extant Biblical Tribes and Clans
Jebusites: Extant Biblical Tribe
The Peoples of Canaan
The Clans of Ar

Two Wives
Horite Hebrew Rulers with Two Wives
The Pattern of Two Wives

Uniqueness of the Bible
Sacred Writings and the Uniqueness of the Bible
The Bible and Imagined Morality

Water
Water and Blood
Theories of Primal Substance
The Stirring of the Water

Wisdom
Seats of Wisdom
Ancient Wisdom, Science and Technology
The Wisdom of Ben Sira
The Chiastic Center of Ecclesiasticus
Who Were the Wise Men?

Women
Women Prophets and Shamans
Sister Wives and Cousin Wives

Written Communications in Antiquity
Yahu Seals
Paleolithic Ostrich Eggshells
The Urheimat of the Canaanite Y
Thamudic Scripts
Thamudic and Nabataean Inscriptions from Umm Al-Rasas by M.C.A. Macdonald
Old North Arabian Scripts
The Writing System of Menes, the First Law Giver
The World's Oldest Books
The Proto-Elamite Script
Canaanite Origins of the Alphabet
Early Written Signs
The Origins of Written Communication
The Writing of David's Realm
Enigmatic Petroglyphs of Saudi Arabia's High Plateau
The Dispilio Tablet

Zion
David's Zion Found

Zipporah
Why Zipporah Circumcised Her Son
A Bridegroom of Blood or a Groom Protected by Blood?
Why Zipporah Used a Flint Knife




Decoding the Longevity of the Genesis Rulers

$
0
0
Alice C. Linsley


In his Homilies on the Psalms, St. Jerome notes: "I am reviewing carefully the places in Scripture where I might find old age mentioned for the first time. Adam lived for 930 years, yet he is not called an old man. Methuselah's life was 969 years, and he is not called an old man. I am coming down all the way to the flood, and after the flood for almost three thousand years, and I find no one who has been called old. Abraham is the first, and certainly he was much younger than Methuselah." (HP 21)

Jerome's observation is significant. Abraham was old, probably about 75 years at his dead. This was a long lifespan for people living about 5000 years ago. Paleopathology indicates that the lifespan of ancient peoples living in an area extending from North Africa to Turkey and Mesopotamia was about 34 years. This applies to peoples in the Late Paleolithic - 30,000 to 9,000 B.C., the Mesolithic - 9,000 to 7,000 B.C. and the Early Neolithic - 7,000 to 5,000 B.C. This would apply to all the rulers listed in Genesis, although rulers tended to live longer than the average people.

One might argue that the patriarchs enjoyed extraordinary longevity by divine providence. Were this the case we would want to know why God’s providence is limited to a specific time, people and place. In other words, the singularity of the extraordinary longevity of these patriarchs is a miracle and therefore beyond scientific explanation. While I believe in miracles, I find this explanation unlikely and without biblical support.

As St. Jerome noted, the only patriarch said to have died at an old age was Abraham (Gen. 24:1, 25:8). This means that the number of years attributed to the Genesis rulers are not to be taken as literal years. They appear to represent ideas about these people and are symbolic.

This is supported by the assignment of 930 years to Adam, an anti-type of Jesus Christ. Paul wrote: “For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ all shall be made alive. But each one in his own order: Christ the first fruits, afterward those who are Christ’s at his coming. Then comes the end, when He delivers the kingdom to God the Father…” (1 Corinthians 15:22-24a)

The number 9 is the last number before beginning the 1-10 counting cycle again. The 3 represents unity of body, mind and soul, and the unity of the Godhead. The symbolism of the zero is likely linked to the solar cycle and has numerical symbolism older than Gematria which has no notation for zero.

Gematria is influenced by Greek sacred geometry and is found in Plato’s writings. Doubtless, Plato was influenced by the geometry of Pythagoras, since he had studied in Egypt, but Pythagoras’ work came much later than the period in which Abraham’s ancestors lived.

In Gematria, numeric values are found by adding the numeric values of the Greek or Hebrew letters. But the numbers in the Genesis King lists are not based on the letters of the Greek or Hebrew alphabets, since these alphabets didn’t exist in Abraham’s time. The number symbolism is likely based on an older system, but it does not help us to understand the symbolism of Kenan's 910 years, Seth's 600 years and Adam’s 930 years because it has no notation for zero and because it is based on alphabets which were unknown to the ancient Horite Hebrew.

In Gematria the sum of Methuselah's 969 days would be represented by the numerical values of the Greek letters omega and stigma, letters unknown to Abraham and his ancestors. Ultimately, Gematria is not helpful in interpreting the number symbolism of Abraham’s Horite Hebrew people.

It is fairly certain that the meaning of the extraordinary numbers in Genesis 4 and 5 is linked to astronomical observations of the ancient astronomer priests who were in the service of the Mighty Men of Old, but there is still much to be learned about this.

It may be that we have to look to the earlier Nilotic solar symbolism. In Egyptian hieroglyphic writing, the zero is a solar symbol and the emblem of the creator God, called Ra ("Ani" in Akkadian). The solar symbol O might signify the divine status of the ruler or it could indicate a solar year of 365 daily cycles.

The ancient Nilotes and the Egyptians had a large inventory of solar symbolism because of their religious understanding of the High God whose emblem was the Sun. Their main ideogram for "Sun" was a representation of the solar disk, such as this:



Is it possible that the zero is simply a solar symbol? The O is for modern thinker a place holder, but it may have represented the sum of the days in a solar cycle, that is 3+6+5 =14 years. Kenan's 910 might be 91+14 = 105 years. Seth's 600 might be 6+14+14 = 44. Adam's 930 years might be 9+3+14 = 26 years.

These are reasonable spans for ancient rulers. However, what are we do with ages that do not have any 0's? Consider Methuselah's son, Lamech the Younger. He is said to have lived 777 years. Did he live only 21 years?





The matter is further complicated by the discrepancy between the various recensions. Lamech the Younger is assigned different numbers. In the Septuagint he is said to have lived 753 years. In the Samaritan Pentateuch, he is said to have lived 653 years, and in the Masoretic Text he is said to have lived 777. No other man in the Genesis king lists has such a discrepancy in the number of years assigned.

The term "Lamech" is a variant of the Akkadian word la-melech, meaning "priest of the King." Hundreds of seals have been found inscribed with la-melech. La-melech seals typically had the image of a scarab (dung beetle) or a sun disc. Both were emblems of the Creator and his Son. The sun disc and scarab were used as a royal seal by the Kings of Judah. Hezekiah's seal is an example.


Who Were the Horite Hebrew?

$
0
0

Horus unites the peoples.

Alice C. Linsley

The mysterious 'Apiru were known also as the Hapiru or Habiru. Habiru is rendered "Hebrew" in English Bibles. These people are the oldest known caste of ruler-priests. In the ancient Egyptian language nibit piru means "lady of the house."

The earliest known references to this group of people are found in ancient Sumerian cuneiform tablets. Ancient Egyptian literature also mentions the 'Apiru. The Habiru are mentioned in the Amarna Letters, a collection of 14th century B.C. letters. The Harris papyrus also speaks of the 'Apriu of Ra at Heliopolis (biblical On), a very prestigious ancient Sun city. Joseph married Asenath, the daughter of the priest of On.

Plutarch wrote that the “priests of the Sun at Heliopolis never carry wine into their temples, for they regard it as indecent for those who are devoted to the service of any god to indulge in the drinking of wine whilst they are under the immediate inspection of their Lord and King. The priests of the other deities are not so scrupulous in this respect, for they use it, though sparingly.”

The Hebrew priests were unique in the ancient world and greatly respected. Therefore, they were sought as servants of the early high kings who constructed palaces and royal temple complexes at what the Bible terms "high places."

The Hapiru served in the ancient Sun temples and shrines. These were build at high elevations near major sources of water. A temple was the mansion (hâît) or the house (pirû) of the god, so Ha'piru refers to those who served at the god's house. The ancient Dravidians referred to their East-oriented temples as Opiru, meaning "Sun House."

The Habiru priests were to meet certain requirements while on duty. They wore only linen or clothing made from plants. Clothing made from animals was not permitted. This is one of the differences between the priest and the shaman. They shaved their heads and bodies daily. Cold water baths were taken several times a day. They practiced sexual abstinence before and while serving at the temple or shrine.

Evidence of the religious devotion and ubiquitous presence of the Horite Hebrew is reflected in the many place names that are associated with Horus:

Because the "piru" housed the deity, only the high priest was allowed to enter the most sacred area of the temple. The people prayed at the gate or in the court. They directed their prayers toward the rising Sun, the emblem of the Creator and his Son. Their ruler-priest acted as a mediator between the people and God.

The term "Habiru" does not designate a tribal group, but rather a caste of priests who were dispersed among widely in the service of the Mighty Men of Old (Genesis 10). These are the first known potentates or High Kings. Among them were the Kushite kingdom builder Nimrod, who is probably Sargon.

Among the Habiru there were different groups, depending on the deity they served. Abraham's Hebrew people were devotees of the High God whose son was called Horus. Thus they are called "Horite" Hebrew. Some of their rulers are listed in Genesis 36.

The priests of Ani/Enki (Mesopotamian) or Ra/Horus (Nilotic) were identified as Horite Hapiru. They spread their devotion to Horus, the son of God, across the ancient Afro-Asiatic Dominion. In The Ancient Egyptian Pyramid and Coffin Texts we find fascinating details about Horus. He was said to be co-equal with the Father and to die and rise on the third day.

Horus was conceived by the overshadowing of the Sun. That is shown in this image of his mother, Hathor. According to Luke 1, the Virgin Mary conceived by divine overshadowing.




The offspring of the Woman of Genesis 3:15 is called the "Seed." Some argue that Jesus never claimed to be the Messiah, the Son of God. However, he identified himself as the Seed when he told his disciples that he was going to Jerusalem to die. "The hour has come for the Son of Man to be glorified. I tell you the truth, unless a kernal/grain/seed of wheat falls into the ground and dies, it remains only a single seed. But if it dies, it produces many seeds." (John 12:23)

The Messianic expectation of Genesis 3:15 was expressed about 1000 years before the Psalms in the ancient Pyramid Texts. "Horus has shattered (tbb, crushed) the mouth of the serpent with the sole of his foot (tbw)" Utterance 388

Consider how Horus describes himself in the ancient Egyptian Coffin Texts (148):

I am Horus, the great Falcon upon the ramparts of the house of him of the hidden name. My flight has reached the horizon. I have passed by the gods of Nut. I have gone further than the gods of old. Even the most ancient bird could not equal my very first flight. I have removed my place beyond the powers of Set, the foe of my father Osiris. No other god could do what I have done. I have brought the ways of eternity to the twilight of the morning. I am unique in my flight. My wrath will be turned against the enemy of my father Osiris and I will put him beneath my feet in my name of ‘Red Cloak’. 

Here we find the words of Psalm 110:1, a clear messianic reference: The Lord says to my Lord: “Sit at My right hand until I make your enemies a footstool for your feet.”

Horus unites the peoples.This is why he is said to wear the double crown. "Then take silver and gold, and make crowns [ataroth], and set them on the head of Joshua the son of Josedech, the high priest..." Zechariah 6:11



The ruler-priest Yeshua (Joshua/Jesus) wears the double crown as a sign that he unites the peoples. The double crown was worn by the rulers of a united Nile Valley. The red crown (desher) represents Lower Nile (Egypt) and the white crown (nefer) represents Upper Nile (ancient Nubia). After the unification of the Upper and Lower Nile regions the two crowns were joined to represent a unified Egypt.

The Horite Hebrew believed that heavenly recognition of a people depended on the righteousness of their ruler-priest. Therefore purity of life was highly valued. The proof of heavenly recognition and acceptance was the resurrection of the dead ruler-priest on the third day.

The New Testament speaks about Jesus as the ruler-priest. He is the firstborn from the grave and by his resurrection He delivers to the Father a "peculiar people." He leads us in the ascent to the Father where we receive heavenly recognition because we belong to Him.

Heavenly recognition for the Horite Hebrew was never an individual prospect. Heavenly recognition came to the people through the righteousness of their ruler-priest. Horite rulers took this seriously, some more than others. The best were heavenly minded and the worst were so earthy minded that they shed much blood enlarging their territories. All failed to be the Ruler-Priest who rose from the dead. Therefore, none have the power to deliver captives from the grave and to lead them to the throne of heaven (Ps. 68:18; Ps. 7:7; Eph. 4:8). The evidence of a long-standing Tradition points to the Son of God, Jesus, who alone fits the pattern of Messianic expectation.

Veneration of the Bear

$
0
0

Alice C. Linsley

Artifacts related to bears have been found globally at the middle and high latitudes. Cave bears lived in the Pyrenees, Alps, and Carpathians. Many bear skeletal remains have been found in caves in these mountain ranges. At that time, (115,000 to 11,700 years ago) humans and bears would have competed for space in rock shelters.

The cave known as "Drachenloch" (Dragon's Lair) was excavated in between 1917 and 1923 by Dr. Emil Bächler. The remains of more than 30,000 cave bears were found. Some accumulations of bear bones were found behind walls. These caches included the long leg bones and more or less complete skulls. Bächler found what he described as stone chests full of bear bones. One of these was about three feet high and covered with a large limestone slab. Inside it were a group of cave bear skulls, all aligned in the same direction. This is one of the more famous discoveries that suggest that Neanderthal humans venerated the bear. Bear veneration is called "arctolatry."

Syrian brown bear
Analysis of prehistoric bone assemblages of bears, mammoths, reindeer, horses, and bulls does suggest that archaic humans were consciously ritualistic in their veneration of the animals with which they co-existed. This is further supported by the intentional red ochre staining of some bear bones. Upper Paleolithic deposits of bear bones recovered from Belgian caves reveal traces of red ochre, and red ochre was generally used for human burials.

This leads to the suggestion that archaic humans regarded bears to be anatomically like humans and applied red ochre to their bones at burial.

Dr. Barry Sanders reports in his anthology Bears, that around 40,000 years ago a "goddess" appeared wearing a bear mask. Between 9000 and 5000 years ago various R1b populations made clay statues of a goddess nursing a bear cub.



Until about 1945, the Ainu elders of Japan raised a bear cub as a family member until the day it was ritually sacrificed. This photo, taken around 1930, shows an Ainu elder and his wife with their bear and a Japanese visitor. The Ainu elder wears the distinctive knobbed headdress. It is same as those worn by "Miqmac" Ainu elders of Canada and by the ancient Annu chiefs of the ancient Upper Nile.



The Miqmac Ainu are in mtDNA haplogroup X. Approximately, 40% of the Druze population of Galilee is in this group. The genetic sequences of Haplogroup X diverged from Haplogroup N which originated in the region of the Lower Nile.

The Miqmac of eastern Canada say that they came through the British Isles to Finland and Greenland and on to Labrador and the eastern seaboard of Canada.

The Ainu appear to have a point of origin in Africa before 70,000 years ago. The Asia-Africa connection is found in Y-DNA Haplogroup DE. DE is distributed in several geographically distinct clusters. Immediate subclade, Haplogroup D, is normally found only in eastern Asia, and the other immediate subclade, Haplogroup E, is common in Africa, Europe, and the Middle East.

The antiquity of bear imagery and veneration invites a deeper investigation into the cultural links between the two groups known to venerate the bear: the Ainu of Japan and Eastern Canada and the Celts of Britain and Gaul.


Bears and the Bible

Humans living in the more northern ranges would have had experience of cave bears and polar bears. Populations living in Israel would have had experience of the Syrian brown bear (shown above). 

The Syrian brown bear inhabited the mountains and forests of ancient Anatolia, Turkey and Iran. It roamed the Mediterranean belt forests, and the forests of the Black Sea region. It was known as far south as the Dead Sea. The range of distribution of the Syrian brown bear is shown on this map in blue.


In the book of Job we read of the Bear constellation as God's creation. "Who made the Bear and Orion, the Pleiades and the chambers of the south..." (Job 9:9)




In the Bible she-bears are portrayed as especially dangerous when with their cubs. "Let a man meet a she-bear robbed of her cubs rather than a fool in his folly." (Proverbs 17:12)

Bears appear in the Bible as ferocious beasts who maul children. The savage attack of a bear is thought to symbolize divine judgement. This may be the message of a disturbing story from II Kings:
“From there Elisha went up to Bethel. As he was walking up the path, some small boys came out of the city and harassed him, chanting, ‘Go up, baldy! Go up, baldy!’ He turned around, looked at them, and cursed them in the name of the Lord. Then two female bears came out of the woods and mauled 42 of the children.” II Kings. 2:23,24



The point seems to be that Elisha was a great prophet and those who malign prophets are under divine judgement. This narrative would have served the dual purpose. It warned children about bears and instilled in them a respect for the prophets. But is there more to this account? I believe there is.

The bear is an ancient symbol of shamanic authority, and in II Kings the appearance of two bears with Elisah points to his spiritual authority. Similarly, the appearance of Elijah and Moses with Jesus at the Transfiguration speaks of His authority as Messiah. 


Related reading: Using Totems to Trace Ancestry and Marriage Ties; "The Cult of the Bear Cave" by Phillip G. Chase; "Fossil Bear Bones in the Belgian Upper Paleolithic: The Possibility of a Proto Bear-Ceremonialism" by Mietje Germonpré and Riku Hämäläinen, Arctic Anthropology, Vol. 44, No. 2 (2007), pp. 1-30 (30 pages); Red Ochre People


The T-Shaped Pillars of Gobekli Tepe

$
0
0

The priests of Çatalhöyük 

Alice C. Linsley

High places such as Gobekli Tepe and Çatalhöyük had royal temples that would have been built by the "Mighty Men of Old" (Genesis 6:4). This image was found at Çatalhöyük (7000 BC). It shows a red skin priest wearing the leopard skin typical of the priests of antiquity who moved out of the Nile valley. Keep in mind that the dispersion of Y-DNA Haplogroup R1 began about 70,000 years ago, long before the time of Noah (4000-2800 BC).

The T-shape pillars at Gobekli Tepe probably represent the Sun's arc from east to west. This shape is a symbol of the High God, and later enters into scripts as the mark of the High God. An example is the oldest known word for the High God among the Chinese, which is s 天 Tiān. The word also means Heaven. I suspect it is closely related to T-An, suggesting that the priests of Anu/Ani (Sumerian and Akkadian) had moved from Bactria into China much earlier than generally assumed.

Göbekli Tepe predates the oldest temple known to have been built by Abraham's Nilo-Saharan ancestors in Sudan at Nekhen by about 3000 years. It predates the Great Pyramids of Giza by about 7000 years. It is the oldest known temple, and it remains shrouded in mystery.

Göbekli Tepe is classified as a Pre-Pottery Neolithic site (PPN). It is designated PPNA (ca 10,500 to 9,500 BC) which puts it in the same class as Jericho, Netiv Hagdud, Nahul Oren, Gesher, Dhar', Jerf al Ahmar, Chogha Golan and Abu Hureyra.

This site is located in what is today Turkey. This "land between the rivers" was an ancient crossroads for peoples migrating between Africa and the ancient Near East.


Göbekli figures
Credit: National Geographic


It is likely that priest smiths moved into the Tigris-Euphrates region and Anatolia from the Nile Valley. The Anatolian metal workers called themselves the Nes or Nas. Their language was called Nesli. Note the parallel inn the Serbian language. The Serbian word nas means us and naši means ours, one of us.

Here we find the same archaic root NS. In Akkadian, "na" is a modal prefix indicating service to, affirmation, or affiliation. The name Na-Hor would then indicate a servant of Horus. I have a suspicion that Na-S refers to archaic metal workers for whom the serpent was a sacred symbol and their totem. The word Nes is associated with the rulers of the Nile. In ancient Egypt, Nesu biti referred to the ruler of a united Upper and Lower Nile.  

It is a characteristic of archaic peoples to designate themselves as the people, humans, or first people. Many archaic populations called themselves names that mean the People or the Humans. The natives of the Aleutian islands call themselves "Anishinabe" which means "First Men" or "Original Men." The term "Ainu" means human. The Navajo call themselves the Dene, which means humans.

It is thought that the Hittites introduced iron work to Anatolia, but the term "Hittite" is an anachronism when we speak of populations as far back as 7000 BC. Abraham interacted with the Hittite clans of Het who are listed in Genesis 10. HT is the Hebrew and Arabic root for copper - nahas-het. Nahash means serpent. As an adjective it means shining bright, like burnished copper. The clans of HeT were Bronze Age copper smiths who ranged from Timna to Anatolia. The serpent image was sacred for them, just as it was for Moses and the people of Israel in the wilderness.




One of the mysteries that archaeologists and anthropologists hope to unravel surrounds the T-shaped monoliths that stand at the perimeter of the sacred mounds at Göbekli Tepe, of which there are about 20. The pattern resembles Stone Hedge with rings of pillars. At the center are twin pillars. The twin pillars and most of the pillars at the periphery are carved to form bas-reliefs of various animals, anthropomorphic figures, and human-animal creatures.

T-shaped pillar 

The vulture, scorpion, horse and lion are found on the stone pillars and they appear to correspond to constellations at a time when Thuban was the pole star. These creatures are commonly found on African images, which suggests that the structure at Gobekli Tepe may have been influenced by priests whose origins were in Africa. The vulture is an important totem among the ancient Nubians.

The earliest pillars are the biggest and most sophisticated in construction and artistry. The later pillars are smaller, less intricate in design and mounted with less precision.

Nate Ramsayer has made a case for the view that the stone pillars might represent individual people. As he states, "This interpretation fits well with the emerging concept of social stratification that can be seen in Anatolia during the PPN at sites like Çayönü and Neval Çori."

If the T-shaped pillars represent humans, they were probably rulers, high ranked priests, or the heads of clans. It may be that clan leaders intended to have stone pillars with the clan's animal totem as a display of wealth or power. Or it may be that the 16-ton limestone pillars represent deified rulers who were venerated as ancestors. Each pillar served as the ruler's presence by which he also represented his clan, before the deity.




The T shape appears to be a very ancient symbol that represented a complex of ideas including heaven, the High God, mankind, and blood. These come together in the Tyet symbol of the Old Kingdom (show above). It consists of a solar orb above a human form (Hathor) and appears to be a variation of the ankh.

Mystery surrounds how the huge pillars were transported from the quarry. Were hundreds of beasts of burden used? If so, why do these animals not appear on the carvings? The animals carved on the pillars include bulls, cranes, ostriches, vultures, lions, serpents and crocodiles, all animals sacred to Abraham's Nilo-Saharan ancestors.

Another mystery surrounds the twin pillars at the center of the shrine. They are superior in quality to the perimeter stones. Tatiana V. Kornienko (Cult Buildings of Northern Mesopotamia) sees the placement of pairs of stones as an important aspect of early cosmology:

The worship of pairs of central objects in ancient sanctuaries or temples is a characteristic feature of a number of early Near Eastern cultures. Such symbolism represents the binary basis and dualism of people’s mythological perception of natural phenomena.

(Note that Kornienko fails to make a distinction between the binary and dualistic worldviews, a distinction that needs to be clarified to correctly trace origins and antecedents.)


Related reading: The Hittites of AnatoliaThe Ostrich in Biblical Symbolism; Megalithic Totemism of the Individual: A new Analysis of Gobekli Tepe's Monumental Pillars; Ethics and Religious Practices of the Afro-Asiatics; The Trapezoid on Ancient Architecture and Technology


The Ancient Antecedents of Ash Wednesday

$
0
0



Alice C. Linsley

The association of ashes with sacrifice at the archaic places of worship is well attested. The oldest places of worship were at elevated sites near permanent water sources. The Bible refers to these as the "high places." Burnt offerings were made at these sites and the ashes were used to purify (lustration). In Numbers 9:19, we read how the ashes of the sacrificed red heifer were used for "water of lustration." This explains why there is a linguistic relationship between the ancient word for high place and words for ashes or charcoal.

The word kar refers to a fortified site with a temple or shrine tended by priests. Karnak on the Nile and Carnak in Brittany are examples. In Dravidian, car means "sheltered together" and kari refers to a river. In Manding, kara means "to assemble." Among the Nilotic Luo, kar specifies a place with boundaries such as mud ramparts or stone fortifications. In Sumerian, é-kur refers to a mountain house, a pyramid, or an elevated temple. In Akkadian, a ruined high place was called karmu. There is a connection between karmu (ruin) and the Magyar/Hungarian word hamu (ashes).

Since the kar were places of burnt offering where ashes were used to purify, the term kar is often associated with charcoal and soot. The Turkish kara means "black." In Magyar/Hungarian, the word korom refers to soot, as does the Korean word kurim.

In the biblical literature we find many figures offering burnt sacrifice on mountains. The practice is older than Judaism. It seems to have pertained to a royal caste of sacrificing priests who were known as Habiru in ancient texts. In English Bibles Habiru is rendered as "Hebrew."

In our time, Ash Wednesday points participants to our mortality and to the hope of bodily resurrection. That hope comes through the atoning sacrifice of Jesus Messiah who offered himself on a high hill shaped like a skull.

The Religious Impulse Among Archaic Populations

$
0
0

6500 year shard found at elevated site in Bellinzona, Switzerland.


Alice C. Linsley

There is a common misconception that religious practices first emerged when humans became more sedentary and began to farm. The prehistoric images painted on the walls of rock shelters suggests that this is not the case. These have a religious quality and many anthropologists believe them rock shelters to be have been places of religious ritual.

There also are archaic temples at high elevations like Gobekli Tepe and Çatalhöyük. At Çatalhöyük the priests wore leopard skins as did the priests of the ancient Upper Nile. These archaic sites indicate organized religion with priests and rituals involving astronomy and the cycle of the seasons. In the Bible these mountain shrines and temples are called "the high places." 

7000-6000 years settlements in the Alps were contemporaneous with settlements in the Carpathian mountains and with Europe's oldest city in Bulgaria. At the same time, Galilee received immigrants from the Zagros mountains.

This is a photo of a mountain fortification in Bellinzona, Switzerland where 6500 year artifacts have been found. 


Around 70,000 years ago people living in Southern Africa carved a python out of the side of a cliff and conducted religious ceremonies there. At the back of the Botswana cave was a chamber believed to be a sacred site because there were no signs of animal bones, tools or cooking fires such as those found in South Africa's Blombos Cave of a similar age.

Another phenomena that indicates religious impulse is the 90,000+ years of burial in red ochre, a symbol of blood. This appears to express the hope of life after death. As it says in the Bible: "Life is in the blood."

From the perspective of anthropology, the deep time record of human activity is evident in the vast number of objects made and used by humans. The religious nature of ritual burial is another example of the depth of human existence. Consider these examples:

100,000 years ago - Burial of humans in red ochre at Qafzeh Cave in what is today Israel. Evidence of human habitation in the area of Bethlehem between 100,000-10,000 BC) is well-attested along the north side of Wadi Khareitun where there are three caves: Iraq al-Ahmar, Umm Qal’a, and Umm Qatafa. These caves were homes in a wooded landscape overlooking a river. At Umm Qatafa archaeologists have found the earliest evidence of the domestic use of fire in Palestine.



50,000 years ago - A small boy buried with a seashell pendant and covered in red ochre

45,000 years ago - A man buried at La Chapelle-aux-Saints in southern France in red ochre

35,000 years ago - Male buried in red ochre in Paviland Cave, Wales

32,000 years ago - Four bodies buried in red ochre at Sungir in Russia.

23,000 years ago - The "Fox Lady" of Doini Vestonice, Czechoslovakia, buried in red ochre

20,000 years ago - A thirty-year-old man buried in Bavaria surrounded by mammoth tusks and submerged in red ochre.

Australian burial sites dating to about 20,000 years reveal pink staining of the soil around the skeleton, indicating that red ochre had been sprinkled over the body. The remains of an adult male found at Lake Mungo in southeastern Australia were copiously sprinkled with red ochre.

19,000 years ago - Lady of El Mirón cave in northern Spain was buried in red ochre. She died around the age of 35.

7000 years ago -Two skeletons buried in red ochre found at La Braña-Arintero cave in the Cantabrian Mountains of Spain

5000 years ago - Two flexed burials were found in Mehrgarh, Pakistan with a covering of red ochre on the bodies

There is no doubt that humans have had a religious impulse from the beginning. It appears to express an awareness of our mortality and a hope for life after death.



The Ritual Removal of Teeth

$
0
0

Alice C. Linsley

In 1966, a Danish dentist found that the Acholi people living near the Sudanese border were  dislodging their infants’ canine teeth. Traditionally, Nilotic cattle herders extracted two to eight maxillary/mandibular incisors and/or canines. This was done to both boys and girls between the ages of seven and ten.

This painful procedure - called "naak" - is part of a rite of passage that occurs during the dry season. The primitive practice involves extracting the canines from the jaw with a piece of iron, and the lower incisors are removed with a fish hook.

Naak is widespread in the more rural areas of Sudan, Uganda and Kenya, but the practice varies from group to group. The Nuer of South Sudan remove the teeth shortly after birth. Likewise, in rural Uganda and Kenya the teeth are often extracted soon after birth. Among the Nilotic Luo initiation involves the removal of six front teeth using the tip of a spear. The practice persists in some Luo clans, especially in Africanized Churches in Luoland, such as the Legio Maria sect.


This Sudanese man's teeth were extracted at age 10.
The reason for the extraction was never explained to him.

People interviewed who underwent the ritual remember being frightened and recall the pain of having the teeth or tooth buds removed. They were given different reasons for why it was done. Some thought removing the teeth would prevent diarrhea. Some believe this is done to enable a person to be fed in the event of lockjaw (tetanus).

Because it was undesirable to cry during the procedure, in which they used fishing knives to remove the teeth, girls went first. Tribesmen told the boys that if the girls didn't cry, then the boys couldn't cry either, said Santino Deng, a Sudanese refugee.

"You were happy if you endured the pain," Ajak said. "People would consider you were a man."

The Sudanese government has been dissuading people from removing teeth for health reasons, but some tribal groups still engage in the practice.

The practice of naak is very ancient, so much so that practitioners today do not know why it is done.  Frazer believed that this practice derived from recognition of the durability of the tooth in the skull after death, and thus the practice served as a statement about the afterlife. 


Natufian Territory


The early Australians apparently practiced tooth removal. The Lake Nitchie male (buried c.6800 years ago) was buried with red ochre and was missed two front teeth. The antiquity of ritual tooth removal is verified by the discovery that naak was practiced by the Natufian populations (12,000 to 7,500 BC).



It appears that tooth extraction was a rite of passage similar to circumcision and that both were performed at ritual sites such as Tell Gezer in Israel (shown above), a site marked by a circle of standing stones. The word "kar" refers to a high sanctuary where sacrifices were offered. Karnak on the Nile and Carnak in Brittany are examples. A Luo informant believes that Kar-naak means "place of ritual." Among the Nilotic Luo, kar specifies a place with boundaries such as mud ramparts or stone fortifications.

In Dravidian, car means "sheltered together" and kari refers to a river. In Manding, kara means "to assemble."  In Sumerian, é-kur refers to a mountain house, a pyramid, or an elevated temple. In Akkadian, a ruined high place was called karmu. There is a connection between karmu (ruin) and the Magyar/Hungarian word hamu (ashes).

Since the kar were places of burnt offering where ashes were used to purify (lustration), the term kar is often associated with charcoal and soot. The Turkish kara means "black." In Magyar/Hungarian, the word korom refers to soot, as does the Korean word kurim.

The Mysterious Natufians

$
0
0

Natufian territory
Alice C. Linsley

The Natufian populations of the ancient world are fascinating and mysterious. They appear to be an "out-of-Africa" population. They are an early biblical population in that their area included parts of Western Egypt (Fayoum Oasis), Mount Carmel, Jericho and Bethlehem, Jordan, Syria, and Lebanon between 15,000 and 7,500 years ago.

When the Natufians lived in the Levant it received sufficient precipitation to sustain crops and orchards. During the African Aqualithic, there were abundant wadis, salt marshes, peat swamps, and lakes in the region extending from the Nile to the Jordan Valley. Core samples taken in the Hula Basin reveal a warm and wet climate during the time the Natufians flourished in this area. This explains the abundance of tortoise shells found at Natufian burial sites.

The Natufians practiced naak, the ritual removal of teeth, a culture trait of Nilotic peoples. Among the Nilotic Luo initiation involves the removal of six front teeth using the tip of a spear. This practice, called naak, persists in some Luo clans, especially in Africanized Churches in Luoland, such as the Legio Maria sect.

Natufian territory is in the heartland of biblical Eden which extended from the Upper Nile to the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers, according to Genesis 2:10-14.

A small Natufian sculpture representing sexual intercourse was found in a cave near Bethlehem. It dates to 11,000 years. Bethlehem has along association with the biblical Horite Hebrew.

Bethlehem is associated with the Horite Hebrew in I Chronicles 4:4 which names Hur (Hor) as the "father of Bethlehem." Rahab of Jericho was the wife of Salmon, the son of Hur (Horite). Salmon is called the "father of Bethlehem" in 1 Chronicles 2:54. Rahab was the grandmother of Boaz who married Ruth. Salmon is a Horite Hebrew name associated with Bethlehem in 1 Chronicles 2:51

The British archaeologist Dorothy Garrod (1932) coined the term "Natufian" while studying remains from the Shuqba cave at Wadi an-Natuf in Palestine. The term is derived from the place, but Natufian ceramics and stone work have been found in many locations ranging from Turkey to the Sinai. She considered the Natufians to be the first agriculturalists based on the presence of sickles to harvest the grains and mortars and pestles to process it.

However, since Garrod's time earlier sickles have been found at Ohalo II, an Upper Paleolithic encampment on the shore of the Sea of Galilee (23,000 BC). At Ohalo II, archaeologists also found wooden objects on brush-hut floors. They include a bark plank, pencil-shaped specimens with longitudinal shavings that may have been decorative or symbolic, and an incised wooden object that is identical in size and incision pattern to a gazelle bone implement found in a grave.

The Natufians in Jordan were baking bread 14,500 years ago. Their diet consisted of meat and plants. The bread was made from wild cereals such as barley, einkorn or oats, and tubers from an aquatic papyrus relative. These were ground into flour and baked in round fire pits made from flat basalt stones, and were located in the middle of huts.

Distinguished Research Professor at UCLA Christopher Ehret notes that the intensive use of plants among the Natufians was first found in Africa, as a precursor to the development of farming in the Fertile Crescent. (Ehret, The Civilizations of Africa: A History to 1800. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 2002)

The British archaeologist Graeme Barker explains: "the similarities in the respective archaeological records of the Natufian culture of the Levant and of contemporary foragers in coastal North Africa across the late Pleistocene and early Holocene boundary". (Barker G, Transitions to farming and pastoralism in North Africa, in Bellwood P, Renfrew C 2002, Examining the Farming/Language Dispersal Hypothesis, pp 151–161.)

Harvard Professor of Prehistoric Archaeology Ofer Bar-Yosef cites the microburin technique and “microlithic forms such as arched backed bladelets and La Mouillah points" as well as the parthenocarpic figs found in Natufian territory originated in the Sudan. (Bar-Yosef O., Pleistocene connections between Africa and South West Asia: an archaeological perspective. The African Archaeological Review; Chapter 5, pg 29-38; Kislev ME, Hartmann A, Bar-Yosef O, Early domesticated fig in the Jordan Valley. Nature 312:1372–1374.)

Related reading: Natufian Culture, The Ritual Removal of Teeth; Natufian Culture and the Origin of the Neolithic in the Levant


Were the Tarim Mummies Afro-Eurasians?

$
0
0

Alice C. Linsley

The mummies of the Tarim Basin in Western China have been the topic of much speculation. It is believed that they moved into the Tarim region from Europe, but it is also possible that their ancestors moved out of the Nile Valley. The Tarim mummies are likely related to the peoples of the Afro-European Haplogroup R1.



Some of the mummies were found at Urumchi (Urumqi) in the Tian Shan Mountains (Mountains of the High God) near the border with Kazakhstan. The dating of the mummies ranges from c.1800 BC to c.500 BC. The Tarim Basin was once dotted with lakes and rivers, but the water has largely disappeared. Today the Taklimakan region is a wind swept desert with the Tian Shan range to the north, the Kunlun mountains to the south, and the Qilian mountains to the east.





















Before the arrival of the Han Chinese, Western China was occupied by people with features that included round eyes, light brown hair, blonde hair, red beards, and blue eyes. Their features are like those of mummies found at Nekhen on the Nile.

In one burial site archaeologists found a wood model of a mummy in a carved boat. This may be similar to the solar barque of the ancient Nilotes that was believed to carry the dead to immortality. Tarim temples were decorated with solar images consistent with the solar symbolism of the R1b Nilotes for whom the Sun was the emblem of the Creator.

Early expeditions to the Tarim Basin led to the discovery of texts written in seventeen different languages. Linguists believe that languages of the Tarim mummies were Khotanese Saka and Tocharian A and B. This chart compares Saka and Tocharian B with Latin and English. All these languages derive from a common Proto-Indo-European (PIE) source.




Linguists note that Tocharian has more in common with the western Indo-European languages than with the eastern Indo-European languages.

The Kushan Yuezhi, also called Saka, called themselves Visha or the Vijaya. This is sometimes rendered as "traders" or "tribes" though the word refers to their two ruling royal houses, as in vijana, the splitting of wisdom. The honorific title "Pharaoh" originates in the term pr-aa, which means "great house." In Vedic tradition, pra-jna means "wisdom of the great house." The words have multiple related meanings (polysemic). In Vedic tradition the a-laya-vijña-na is the seed of the receptacle-world, but literally it means the receptacle of the seed, as in vagina, symbolized originally by the pictograph V.

The Kushan high king called himself "son of heaven" or the “son" of God (Tian), as did the rulers of the Nile.

The Yuezhi Kushan spoke Tocharian and are sometimes referred to as Tochara. They were organized into five clans and the clan chiefs were called Yabgu. Note the initial solar cradle Y. It designates a divinely appointed ruler (deified "son" of God), which is why it appears in the Hebrew names of many biblical rulers: Yaqtan (Joktan); Yishmael (Ishmael); Yishbak; Yitzak (Isaac); Yacob (Jacob); Yosef (Joseph); Yetro (Jethro); Yeshai (Jesse), Yonah (Jonah), and Yeshua (Joshua/Jesus).


Saka Yuezhi warrior


Among the Nilotes the solar orb rested in the horns of bulls. Among the Saka the solar orb often rested in the antlers of deer. This is bronze standard, with it solar imagery, has a stag and two bulls. It was found at Alaca Höyük and dates to about 1900 BC.




The territory of the Yuezhi Kushan was about two thousand miles north of India. The land is at a high altitude with a dry climate, though it was once wet. The people were known for their skill at archery and horsemanship. The skin tone of the Kushan was reddish like that of the rulers of Nekhen on the Nile, the oldest know site of Horite Hebrew worship.

 The relationship of the Kushan and the Nilotic Kushites has been explored here.

Biblical Populations and Akkadian

$
0
0
How spoken Akkadian may have sounded.

Alice C. Linsley

The Indian scholar, Malati J. Shendge, has concluded that the language of the Harappans of the Indus Valley was Akkadian. Shendge believes that the language of the Harappan civilization is reflected in the Asuras. She says, "The earlier works and other details mentioned in the context of the Asuras prove that the Harappan language was related to their Iraqi counterparts." (From here.)

Among the cognates in Sanskrit and Akkadian are the names of gods and priests; words for parts of the body, the horse, and household and temple furnishings.

Ajay Pratap Singh has written, "Comparisons of Akkadian and Sanskrit words yielded at least 400 words in both languages with comparable phonetic and semantic similarities. Thus Sanskrit has, in fact, descended from Akkadian."

Support for this view comes from Harappan artifacts that are similar to those of the ancient Nile. A connection between the two riverine civilizations is made in Genesis 10 where we are told that Nimrod, a Kushite kingdom builder, ruled where Akkadian was the language of the empire.

The Bible scholar, E.A. Speiser, found that names taken to be Indo-European were often labeled "Hurrian" and were later identified as Akkadian.

Hurrian or Horite names in ancient documents does not mean that there was a Hurrian or Horite language. The Horites were widely dispersed and spoke the languages of the people among whom they lived. Today scholars use terms like Ugaritic-Hurrian, Hurro-Urartian and Hurro-Akkadian, or Canaano-Akkadian.



Ugaritic-Hurrian shares many letters with Hebrew and is also read from left to right. This Ugarit alphabet chart shows the Ugarit letters in order. There are eight additional letters in the Ugarit alphabet that are not in the Hebrew alphabet, two of which are vowels. The tablet is missing the 13th, 14th, and 25th letters, which appear to have been broken off the right end of the tablet.

According to this study, "Ugaritic-Hurrian matches the initial stage of intermingling, Hurro-Akkadian reflects gradually more intense blending, and Canaano-Akkadian corresponds to the phase of a profound fusion of the two source codes."

This view of the emergence sequence aligns with the view of Sholmo Izre'el (Tel Aviv University) He writes, "To my mind, the best term used so far for indicating the nature of Canaano-Akkadian is mixed language. While not attempting a definition of the term, Bakker and Mous do see similarities between the languages described in their collection Mixed Languages (1994). They do, however, propose the term language intertwining ‘for the process forming mixed language showing a combination of the grammatical system (phonology, morphology, syntax) of one language with the lexicon of another language’ (Bakker and Mous 1994: 4-5).”

Hurro-Urartian developed in the Taurus Mountains and is similar to old Armenian.




The map shows where the Hurro-Urartian dialects were spoken.

Arabic speakers note a similarity between some words in modern Assyrian and ancient Akkadian. A list is provided here.

Related reading: Akkadian Lexicon


Mongolian Lexicon

$
0
0



Alice C. Linsley

This short list of Mongolian words will be helpful to Biblical Anthropologists seeking linguistic connections between the Central Asian populations and biblical populations. It is best used alongside the Hungarian Lexicon, the Ancient Egyptian Lexicon, and the Akkadian Lexicon.


achor - towel
ado - horse herd
aduu - horse
agui - cave
airag - mare's milk
alchaã - shelter, hut, booth
altan - golden
amche - physician
arag - wine

baatar - hero
boroo - rain
buqa - stud bull

chono - wolf
chuluun - stone

gal - fire
gerel - light
ger - home, tent (ghar - home in Urdu/Hindi)
gobi - desert
gol - river
golomt - hearth

halkhazug - gown
hün - adult male, man
hünij - human being

ild - Mongolian scimitar, sabre
ikh - great

khöndii - valley, large gorge
khoomii - diphonic throat song in which the singer produces 2 separate lines simultaneously
kurultai - a political or military council (khur - to assemble, to discuss)

magtaal - ode
mergen - wise
mogoi - snake
mod - tree
möngön - silver
mori - horse
mörön - large river

naranu gerel - sunlight
nar/naran - the Sun
nokhoi - dog

od - star
ödör - day
ols - rope
ordo - the central tent of a leader, a seat of honor
ovoo - sacred stone heap (Variants: oboo and obo)

quduã - water well

salhi - wind
sar - the Moon
shuvuu - bird
sogchas - Mongolian dress
sogjil - ear ring
sogzha - hat
šönö - night

takhilch - preserver of Tradition, caretaker
temegen - camel
temur - iron
terigün - head
tenger - sky
Tengri - High God
tsas - snow
tuãul - calf

üker - cattle, cow, bull, ox,
umusu - socks
ünijen - milk cow
us/usny - water
uul - mountain

The ACNA and the Priesthood of the Church

$
0
0

Women "bishops" of the Episcopal Church

Alice C. Linsley

This has been a difficult article to write due to the strength of my conviction that women’s ordination to the sacred order of priests is a dangerous innovation that will continue to cause division in the Anglican Church in North America. It is unfortunate that this practice carried over from the Episcopal Church.

I have been speaking and writing on this subject for over 15 years, mainly from the perspective of Biblical Anthropology, but also from personal experience as a former priest in the Episcopal Church. I have no illusion that what I say will change the minds of those who hold their positions with equally firm conviction.

The ACNA College of Bishops recently heard from three women on the subject of women in ministry. Two of the women are ordained and one is a lay person. If the bishops are earnestly interested in listening to all views, what I offer here may be helpful. I speak as a woman in lay ministry.

I am not hopeful that a catholic resolution on the question of women priests can be achieved in the ACNA. Anglicans appears to relish theological ambiguity and our bishops do not insist on uniformity of doctrine and practice when it comes to nonessentials. That the all-male priesthood touches the heart of the Messianic Faith that we call “Christianity” does not sway the supporters of women’s ordination. Nor do they appear to be disturbed by the tension this innovation creates in ecumenical relations with bodies that uphold catholic orders.

Anglicans claim Scripture as our central authority, yet supporters of women’s ordination obfuscate the fact that not a single woman priest is found in the Bible. Many are proud of the “reformed” nature of the Anglican Way, yet they are unwilling to reform to the received Tradition of the all-male priesthood. They do not recognize the truth of Father Louis Tarsitano’s words: “The priesthood of Christ, and that representative priesthood rooted in Christ's priesthood is changeless. To change it is to change the New Testament itself.”

On the question of women priests, Archbishop Edmund Akanya of the Anglican Church of Nigeria has stated: “Our position as a church is that it runs counter to scripture and more so our culture. Even the women themselves are seriously opposed to women’s ordination. This position has been held before I became a bishop. In fact, it is looked at as something that led to the issue of human sexuality today.”

Archbishop Akanya is justified in this view since the first woman ordained to the priesthood in the Episcopal Church (following the decision of General Convention) was Ellen Marie Barrett, a lesbian who served with gay activist Louie Crew as co-president of Integrity. She was ordained in 1977 by the social activist Bishop Paul Moore of New York.

The critical moment for affirmation of the catholic position on the priesthood has long passed. At the inception of the Anglican Church in North America, the lead Bishops unanimously agreed to work together for the good of the Kingdom. As part of this effort, different positions on the ordination of women would be acceptable in a spirit of mutual love and respect, and a desire to move forward for the good of the ACNA. This commitment was embedded in the Constitution and Canons overwhelmingly adopted by the Inaugural Assembly in 2009.

It is unfair, therefore, to accuse the Bishops of "kicking the can down the road" on women’s ordination. They are doing exactly what they agreed to do. As Bishop Jim Hobby said in response to questions about the three women’s presentations to the House, “From my limited experience and perspective, I see bishops engaging in respectful conversation about theological differences while working together to strengthen the Church and to reach the world with the Gospel.”

In the Victoria Statement, the ACNA bishops expressed regret that they had not been more supportive of women in ministry. The Bishops met in Victoria, Canada in September 2017 to discuss holy orders and the role of women. At that meeting they said, “We have not effectively discipled and equipped all Christians, male and especially female, lay and ordained, to fulfill their callings and ministries in the work of God’s kingdom. We repent of this and commit to work earnestly toward a far greater release of the whole Church to her God-given mission.”

As part of that commitment, a Bishops’ Working Group on Holy Orders was formed. This group is co-chaired by Bishop Clark Lowenfield and Bishop Jim Hobby. (Bishop Hobby’s wife, Shari, is an ACNA priest.)

The bishops should not be overly hard on themselves. They inherited this conflicted condition and they are saddled with it. Though most ACNA bishops do not favor women’s ordination, female priests is now the cultural norm in the ACNA. Given what I have learned from anthropology about cultural change, I doubt the ACNA can reform to the biblical norm.

The preservation of a fragile ACNA coalition is more important than the boundary stones set up by our holy ancestors (Proverbs 22:28). Those markers enable us to discern and avoid errant paths.

The Anglican Church in North America has been permanently corrupted by the adoption of a practice from TEC. The polity of the ACNA is such that no leader has the authority to correct this. In effect, the ACNA has a crisis of authority.

As an anthropologist, I've studied how outside innovations can gradually and completely change the social fabric of a community if they are adopted. Rarely does the community return to the original pattern. If there is a return to the community's native pattern, it is because a very strong leader makes that happen. A biblical example is King Josiah who removed the celestial horses from the temple entrance probably because these had become symbolic of shamanist practices such as bestiality in a royal fertility ritual and human and horse sacrifice among some populations.

The Church is a conserving entity by whichGod preserves right belief and right actions in the service of humanity. Unfortunately, the conservation of wildlife and the environment have become higher priorities than the conservation of Scripture and Tradition. Social justice ranks above preserving the Gospel ministry of the all-male priesthood. Feminism, and its underlying Marxist worldview, dictates our thinking about the roles of men and women in the Church.

In his treatise “Priestesses in the Church,” C. S. Lewis observed, “The innovators are really implying that sex is something superficial, irrelevant to the spiritual life. To say that men and women are equally eligible for a certain profession is to say that for the purposes of that profession their sex is irrelevant. We are, within that context, treating both as neuters. As the State grows more like a hive or an ant-hill it needs an increasing number of workers who can be treated as neuters. This may be inevitable for our secular life. But in our Christian life we must return to reality.”


Related reading: Anglicans Divided; Why Women Were Never Priests; Men at Altar, Women at Empty Tomb


The Scapegoat

$
0
0

Alice C. Linsley

Leviticus 16:11-16 contains instructions for Aaron's first entrance into the Tent of Meeting and the veiled Shrine of the High God YHWH. Aaron is to prepare by washing himself and vesting in the garments of the high priest. He is to offer a bull to make expiation for himself and for his household. He is to slaughter the bull and with his finger he is to sprinkle some of the bull's blood over the "cover" on the east side and in front of the cover he is to sprinkle the blood seven times with his finger. By this means Aaron is to "purge" the Shrine of the uncleanness and transgression of the Israelites.

After he has made expiation for himself and his household, Aaron is to purge the altar that is before the LORD. He is to take some of the blood of the bull and the he-goat and apply it to the horns of the altar and the rest of the blood is to be sprinkled on the altar seven times with his finger. (Lev. 16:17-19. All references used in this post follow the verse numbers of the Hebrew Bible.)

Leviticus 16 also speaks of another goat. This is the goat that is to be sent away and it is usually referred to as the "scapegoat." However, the goat is designated "Azaz-el" which means the "strong one of God." This goat is led by a ruler of the people, designated itti, to the wilderness where it is released. This goat also makes expiation (verse 10). The ruler who sets the Azaz-el free in the wilderness is to wash his clothes and bathe his body before he re-enters the camp (verse 26).

It is interesting that the remains of the sacrificed bull and goat are also to be taken outside the camp where they are to be consumed in fire (holocaust). He who burns them is to wash his clothes and bathe himself before he may re-enter the camp (verse 28).

Christians have noted parallels to the Gospel narratives about Jesus Messiah. He was driven into the wilderness by the Holy Spirit where he contended with temptations.

Jesus is a "sent-away" son. In the Bible the sent-away sons are the heroes and it is to them that God delivers a kingdom.

His death was on a hill "outside the camp" of Jerusalem.

He was crucified by the Romans, but he was led to them by the High Priest, a ruler of the people.

His blood is regarded as the final and sufficient covering for the sins of the world.

Christians believe Jesus to be the "strong man" and this sheds a different light on the parable of the strong man in Mark 3.


A shaved priest (korah) sacrificing a ram


What happened to the ram?

Leviticus 16:5 mentions a ram that is to be offered also, but the ram is not mentioned again in the entire chapter. This is curious because the ram was a sacred offering among the Horite Hebrew, Aaron's ruler-priest caste. The "binding of Isaac" (Akadeh) in Genesis 22 ends with Isaac's life being spared through divine intervention and the substitution of a ram.

For Abraham the Horite Hebrew, the lamb was associated with the east and the rising of the sun. The ram was associated with the west, the setting sun, and the future. This belief emerged from the solar imagery of the Proto-Gospel. Horus, the son of Ra was depicted as being one with the Father. He rode with the Father on the solar boat. The boat of the morning hours was called Mandjet and the boat of the evening hours was called Mesektet. While Horus was on Mandjet he was in the form of a lamb. While in the Mesektet, he was in his ram-headed form.

It was the custom of the Hebrews in Egypt to observe certain festivals. One was the festival of the death and resurrection of Horus who was called "son" of God. This lasted five days and involved sowing wheat seed in the fields. Perhaps this is why Jesus spoke of his impending death using the image of a seed being sown in the ground in order to give life (John 12:24).

Another festival involved a three-day journey into the wilderness. This likely involved sacrifice of a ram, an animal that was sacred to the Egyptians. (See Exodus 3:18; 5:3, and 8:26-28.) This is why Moses said to Pharaoh that the Hebrew clans had to make a three-day journey into the wilderness. "...for the sacrifices that we offer to the LORD our God are an abomination to the Egyptians. If we offer in the sight of the Egyptians sacrifices that are an abomination to them, will they not stone us?”

There is an interesting linguistic connection between the ram and the soul in ancient Egyptian thought. Both are the same word - ba. No wonder the Egyptians did not kill rams!


Related reading: Rabbinic Take on the Word Azazel; What Abraham Discovered on Mount Moriah; The Ra-Horus-Hathor Narrative; Sent-Away Sons




The Horite High Places

$
0
0



Alice C. Linsley


The mysterious 'Apiru were also known as the Hapiru or Habiru. Habiru is rendered "Hebrew" in English Bibles. The term piru refers to a house of temple. A temple was the mansion (hâît) or the house (pirû) of the god. The ancient Dravidians referred to their East-oriented temples as Opiru, meaning "Sun House."

In the Pyramid Texts, the deceased king is urged to rise to life and to visit the Horite "great houses" or temples. (Utterance 665)

In the ancient Egyptian language nibit piru means "lady of the house" or the lady of the temple. This would refer to the mistress of a royal household and to the royal daughter who was in charge of a temple. During his reign (c. 2334–2284 BC) Sargon appointed his daughter Heduanna as the En of the temple at Ur. The Akkadian term En means lord, master, royal official, priest or priestess. En-Heduanna served the High God Anu and his son En-Ki (Lord of the Earth) at the House (pr) of Anu.

In Akkadian the word for priest was abru, and the priesthood or a caste of priests was called abrutu. In the ancient world, there were many castes of priests. They were identified by the deity they served, and it was believed that deity appointed the ruler in whose realm the priests served. The religion of the territory was the religion of the ruler and the priest caste that served the ruler.

The Horite Hebrew priests were unique among the priest castes of the ancient world and greatly respected for their purity and sobriety. Plutarch wrote that the “priests of the Sun at Heliopolis never carry wine into their temples, for they regard it as indecent for those who are devoted to the service of any god to indulge in the drinking of wine whilst they are under the immediate inspection of their Lord and King. The priests of the other deities are not so scrupulous in this respect, for they use it, though sparingly.” Due to their prestige, the Horite Hebrew were sought as servants of the high kings who constructed palaces and royal temple complexes at the "high places." Their association with elevated sites may be why the Horite Hebrew are sometimes described as cave dwellers.

Heliopolis (Sun City) was known by the natives as Iunu, meaning place of pillars. (Likewise, the royal complex of Dendera was known as Iunet. The I represents a pillar.) Iunu was one of the most prestigious Horite high places. The Harris papyrus speaks of the 'Apriu of Ra at Heliopolis (biblical On), as do the Coffin Texts and the Pyramid Texts. Joseph married Asenath, the daughter of the priest of On. Other ancient texts that speak of Horite high places (mounds) include Sumerian and Akkadian cuneiform tablets and the Amarna Letters, a collection of 14th century B.C. letters.

The Horite Hebrew served kings throughout the ancient world. Among the Nilotes, they served Re, which simply means "father of..." in ancient Egyptian. Re is the father of Horus whose mother Hathor conceived him by divine overshadowing (cf. Luke 1). The name Horus is derived from the root HR, which means the "One on high." Related Egyptian words include her, meaning over or above; horiwo - head, and hir - praise. Horus and Hathor are often shown on ancient Egyptian monuments as the father and mother of the dead kings, but whom the deceased hope to rise from the grave.

Among the Mesopotamians, the Horite Hebrew served Anu, the father of Enki. Wherever the Horite Hebrew became established there was a belief that the High God has a son. This is a central belief of the Messianic Faith called "Christianity."

Evidence of the Horite Hebrew can be found at many of the oldest high-elevation temples. This green malachite stone, a gift from the Egyptian king with whom the Hittites signed a treaty in BC 1258, was at the center of a Horite shrine in the Hittite capital of Hattusa (in Çorum Province in Turkey). Among the ancient Nilotes green malachite represented new life and the hope of resurrection. The land of the blessed dead was described as the "field of malachite."




Green stones were associated with Horus, whose animal totem was the falcon. The Book of the Dead speaks of how the deceased will become a falcon "whose wings are of green stone" (chapter 77). The protective Eye of Horus amulet was made of green stone. The Ancient Pyramid Texts speak of Horus as the "Lord of the green stone" (Utterance 301).


Horite Pillars, Pyramids, and Mounds

For the Horites the mound or high place represented the primeval creation. The first land to rise from the primordial flood was called TaTJaNuN by the ancient Egyptians. In the Ugaritic creation story the two mounds are likewise indicated by the sign T. The mounds Trgzz and Trmg emerged from a universal ocean and held up the firmament. They also marked the entrance to the Netherworld, so the phrase pillars refer to the Creator's work whereby the heavens and the earth are connected.

The Pyramid Texts [hereafter PT] describe the four cardinal points as "four pillars" (Utterance 217). The pillars connect heaven and earth, as Dr. Zahi Hawass notes:
"The true pyramid, while retaining its meaning as primeval mound and stairway to the stars, also represents the rays of the sun as they stream down to earth. It echoes the benben, a pointed stone that was the solar symbol par excellence." (Hawass, Mountains of the Pharaohs, p. 34)

The first mound of God is found in the mythology of the Horite settlements at On and Memphis. Their mounds, pyramids, and sacred stone pillars called benben represent the first land that rose from the chaotic waters. In the On myth, Atum-Re arose from the primeval mound and created the first two humans as deities. In the Memphis narrative, Ptah rose from the primeval mound and gave order to the world through his word/speech. The ancient Egyptians called the sacred mound mer, which is also the Egyptian word for love.

The idea of the earth resting on pillars is found in I Samuel 2:8 - "For the pillars of the earth are the Lord’s and he had set the world upon them." This idea is also found in Psalm 75:3: "It is I who have firmly set its pillars." These are the pillars described in Job 9:6 - "Who shakes the earth out of its place, and its pillars tremble."


Nubian captives


The Horite Mounds and the Sethite Mounds

It appears from the Pyramid Texts that the Horites and the Sethites maintained separate settlements. Utterance 308 addresses them as separate entities: "Hail to you, Horus in the Horite Mounds! Hail to you, Horus in the Sethite Mounds!"

PT Utterance 470 contrasts the Horite mounds with the mounds of Seth, designating the Horite Mounds "the High Mounds."

The two groups appear to be separate yet related, suggesting a moiety, such as that of the Red and Black Nubians. The term moiety refers to two social or ritual groups into which a people is divided. The distinction between the two groups is evident in PT Utterance 424: "O King, a boon which the King grants, that you occupy the Mounds of Horus, that you travel about the Mounds of Seth..." Here we find a suggestion that the Horites indeed take their name from their devotion to Horus.

PT Utterance 424 continues, "that you [King] sit on your iron throne and judge their affairs at the head of the Great Ennead which is in On." Though separate, the Horites and the Sethites are judged by a common king.

That both groups serve the same king is evident from PT Utterance 213: "O King, you have not departed dead, you have departed alive...The Mounds of Horus serve you, the Mounds of Seth serve you."

The extent of the King's reign is considerable. In his resurrection body he is to "traverse the Mound of Horus of the Southerners" and "traverse the Mound of Horus of the Northerners." (PT Utterances 536 and 553) The risen king restores his settlements and cities, and opens doors to the Westerners, Easterners, Northerners and Southerners (Pt Utterance 587). He is to "betake himself to the Mansion of Horus which is in the firmament" (PT Utterance 539).

The risen king unites the peoples, restores the former state of blessedness, and unites heaven and earth. When seen from this perspective, the Horite religion appears to be the foundation of the Messianic hope that is fulfilled in Jesus of Nazareth.


Related reading: Horite Temples; The Pillars of the Earth; The High Places: The Symbolism of the Eye of Horus in the Pyramid Texts; Righteous Rulers and the Resurrection; Horus of the Two Crowns; The Ra-Horus-Hathor Narrative; Blood and the Impulse to Immortality


Ethnic and Cultural Diversity in the Bible

$
0
0

Alice C. Linsley

The discipline of Biblical Anthropology can be daunting. It involves gathering data about many biblical populations. Yes, there are many more populations than the Hebrews, the Israelites, and the Jews. Even these populations are not the same.

Understanding the Bible requires more than an understanding of biblical theology. It also requires understanding the cultural contexts of these biblical populations:

Amalekites
Ammonites
Amorites
Black and red Nubians
Arabians
Arameans
Assyrians
Babylonians
Bithynians
Cappadocians
Carthaginians
Chaldeans
Cretans
Cypriots
Dedanites
Edomites (Idumeans)
Egyptians
Elamites
Ethiopians
Galatians
Greeks
Hagrites
Hebrews
Hittites
Horites
Hyksos
Iberians
Ishmaelites
Israelites
Jebusites
Jews
Kenites
Kushites
Luddites
Macedonians
Madai
Medes
Midianites
Moabites
Nabataeans
Parthians
Perizzites
Persians
Phoenicians
Philistines
Phrygians
Romans
Samaritans
Scythians
Syrians

The list is long, but not comprehensive. There are some populations about which we find so little data in the Bible that they will probably remain obscure. Among them are the Kassites, Gerasenes, Gittites, Gizonites, Shunammites, and Tizites.

The Bible also speaks of general classifications, that is, populations that live in the same region, or share a common ancestry and culture. This is the case with the Canaanites. Among them the Bible lists Arkites, Arvadites, Girgashites, Hivites, Jebusites, Kenizzites, and Zemites. The terms "Kushite" and "Greek" refer to many ethnic groups, as does the term "Barbarian."

Some populations are known by different names at different periods of history. The Edomites are also called Seirites, and later called Idumeans. The Madai are also called Medes. The same is true for the Hebrew who are sometimes designated "Horites" (Gen. 36) and are called "Abru" in ancient Akkadian texts.

To further complicate the picture we have sects within these groups. The writer of Acts identifies a group among the Greek speakers as "Hellenists" (Acts 6, 8, and 9). Among the Jews we find Essenes, Karaites, Pharisees, Sadducees, and Zealots.

Some group names do not refer to an ethnicity, but rather to a social status. That is true for the term "Nephilim" which refers to archaic rulers, or the "mighty men of old" (Gen. 10). Unfortunately, many Bibles render nephilim as “giants” when it should read “great ones.” Nephilim comes from the same root as the Aramaic npyl (nephil) which means great in rank or stature. This is equivalent to the Arabic nfy, meaning hunter. It is said concerning Nimrod that he was a “mighty hunter” or a “mighty man” before the Lord. Genesis 6 describes the Nephilim as gibboriym, meaning “powerful ones.”

Other names refer to clans. The Anakim are a people descended from Anak. The Anakim were organized into a three-clan confederation. The three clans were named for the highest ranked sons of Anak - Sheshai, Ahiman and Talmai (Josh.15:14). Anak and his people the Anakim dwelt in the region of Hebron. Anak's father was Arba. Hebron was called Kiriath-Arba. The Anakim are associated with the Nephilim (Num. 13:33), with the Raphaim (Deut. 2:10), and with the clan of Caleb (Josh.15:13). Therefore, Caleb’s offensive against the Anakim was a war against some of his kinsmen.

The "people of Israel" are comprised of multiple clans descended from Jacob. Like the descendants of Anak, the descendants of Jacob fought among themselves. The clan of Benjamin was nearly wiped out by their fellow Israelites.

We note a familial relationship between clans that share certain radicals. Note the “le” prefix in these clan names: Le’hab, Le’sha, Le’tushim and Le’ummim (Gen. 25:3). The Semitic languages typically have particles that begin with L (le, lu or la). Le is a Hebrew prefix, but it appears in older languages such as Akkadian. La’baru - pertains to granting long life and is related to the Akkadian word la’biru, meaning old. There is also linguistic evidence of three-clan confederations, such as Jubal, Jabal and Tubal; Uz, Huz and Buz, and Og, Gog and Magog.

Some clan names indicate a caste. The Tahash clan were related to Abraham the Hebrew. One of Abraham's nephews was Tahash (Gen. 22:24). Tahash refers to a tanner of animal skins. Exodus 25:5 links "five ram skins dyed red" with "tahash skins." The Tahash caste of Hebrew ritually prepared the skins of sacrificed animals for use in solemn oaths, such as the passing of leather sandals (Ruth 4:7).

Another caste were the Horite Hebrew. These were priests who served the High God and his son. The Horite Hebrew priests were unique among the priest castes of the ancient world and greatly respected for their purity and sobriety. Some prominent members of this caste include Abraham, Moses, Joshua, Samuel, and David.

The complexity and diversity of biblical populations is the focus of Biblical Anthropology. This is why Biblical Anthropology is a great aid in understanding of the Bible.

Anonymous Grumpy Head

$
0
0



Facebook has blocked sharing anything from this blog because an anonymous grumpy head reported it as spam. I manage the blog for Christian Women in Science (CWIS) and I have never spammed this URL or any article that appears at this site.

I am glad that Facebook is going to review the claim for the second time. The original message I received was that content at the blog is abusive and violates community standards. Now I'm told that the complaint involves spamming.

The CWIS blog was set up six years ago as a resource for Christian School teachers and home school parents seeking solid resources to teach STEM and the history of science and technology.  It is entirely informational and represents a range of scientific positions. That is evident from a quick review of the INDEX.

CWIS is an organization I helped to found and this blog was set up with the permission of the CWIS Board. CWIS is an affiliate of the American Scientific Affiliation.

Please share this post with teachers and home school parents. Try posting a link to this at your Facebook page also.


Alice C. Linsley




Pentecost as Foretaste of the Great Gathering

$
0
0



Pentecost marks the culmination of the Easter-Ascension event. It is the foretaste of the great gathering of all faithful people, both the living and those in repose. Matthew 8:11 alludes to the great gathering: "Many shall come from the east and the west and sit down with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob in the kingdom of heaven."

The phrase "Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob" is a formulaic expression for the righteous ancestors in repose. They enjoy God's peace as they await the Day of the Lord. All the faithful shall be gathered to the bosom of God the Father. In the Risen Messiah a scattered people are gathered and made one by the gift of the indwelling Holy Spirit. Peoples of many tongues receive the same message of salvation and rejoice together.

God both gathers and scatters. The "scatter-gather" motif is found throughout Scripture. The peoples of the Afro-Asiatic Dominion spoke one language (Gen. 11:1) until they were scattered. According to the Tower of Babel story, this scattering was the result of linguistic diversification attributed to God.

In Judges we read that the king of the Scattered People resided in Bezek. Bezek means “scatter.” The king of Bezek delighted in cutting off the toes and thumbs of the rulers he conquered. The toes and thumbs were scattered and the rulers were made to gather crumbs like dogs under Bezek’s table. Perhaps this absolute domination was in the mind of the Syrophoenician woman when she came to Jesus begging that He restore her daughter (Mark 7, Matthew 15). 

Consider this historic Anglican Prayer: "We do not presume to come to this thy Table, O merciful Lord, trusting in our own righteousness, but in thy manifold and great mercies. We are not worthy so much as to gather up the crumbs under thy Table. But thou art the same Lord, whose property is always to have mercy: Grant us therefore, gracious Lord, so to eat the flesh of thy dear Son Jesus Christ, and to drink his blood, that our sinful bodies may be made clean by his body, and our souls washed through his most precious blood, and that we may evermore dwell in him, and he in us. Amen."

When Judah and Simeon captured the King of Bezek, they did to him what he had done to the other rulers. Later God warns the clans of Jacob and Joseph through Joshua (Yeshua) that they will be treated the same if the people slip into idolatry: "The LORD will scatter you among the peoples” (Deuteronomy 4:27).

In Ezekiel, we find a prophesy that God was bringing a “sword” upon Israel and would “scatter” their bones (Ezekiel 37). Ezekiel is shown a valley strewn with dry bones and he is asked, “Son of man, can these bones live?” Ezekiel is told to "Prophesy to these bones and say to them, ‘Dry bones, hear the word of the Lord! This is what the Sovereign Lord says to these bones: I will make breath enter you, and you will come to life. I will attach tendons to you and make flesh come upon you and cover you with skin; I will put breath in you, and you will come to life. Then you will know that I am the Lord.’”

The Spirit (Ruach) came from the four directions and the gathered bones lived. Ezekiel prophesied “Come from the four winds, O breath, and breathe on these slain, that they may live” and breath came into the gathered bones and they lived (Ezekiel 37:9,10).


The Town Gate

$
0
0



The town gate was a place of significant activity among biblical populations. The gate served as a passageway into the fortified settlement and also as a gathering place. Usually the town's entrance had an outer and inner gate. There was an area between the gates where men gathered to hear the news and deliberate among themselves. This is where the elders heard cases and rendered judgments, and prophets declared the Word of the Lord.

This custom is described in the last chapter of the book of Ruth. At the gate of Bethlehem, Boaz meets with the kinsman redeemer and tells him, “Naomi, who has come back from the plateau of Moab, is putting up for sale the piece of land that belonged to our kinsman Elimelech. So I thought I would inform you. Before those here present, including the elders of my people, purchase the field; act as redeemer. But if you do not want to do it, tell me so, that I may know, for no one has a right of redemption prior to yours, and mine is next.” 

The kinsman redeemer agrees to redeem the property until he learns that he also must act as the "levir" and produce an heir for Ruth's dead husband (levirate marriage). He replies to Boaz, “I cannot exercise my right of redemption for that would endanger my own estate. You do it in my place, for I cannot" (Ruth 4:6).

Here we glimpse the complexity of Horite Hebrew inheritance rights. By levirate marriage a widow was able to retain her deceased husband's holdings.

Because the ruler-priest had two first born sons by his two wives, provision was made for both sons to receive an inheritance. Additionally, grants were made to "sent-away" sons.

Daughters could petition to receive inheritance.

In an extremely archaic practice, inheritance rights were attached to whoever had possession of the clan ancestor figurines (teraphim).

Each of these situations is considered in this article on The Social Structure of the Biblical Hebrew.




Viewing all 357 articles
Browse latest View live